matt: paul brain, head of fixed income at newton investment.asure having you with us for the hour. let's get the first word news with annabelle droulers in hong kong. the federal reserve made clear it doesn't want u.s. money market rates despite again. it has announced it will inject cash into the system for a third day. jpmorgan's chief executive shrugged off the turmoil. he said it isn't a significant problem and will only be troubling if the economy weakens. the final day of hearings and u.k. premier court -- supreme court for the parliament's suspension. promised the has government would put out a statement on what it would do if it loses the case. the court hasn't given a date for the ruling. it has the potential to derail boris johnson's brexit strategy or cut short his premiership. the bank of england looks set to keep rates on hold. staying out of the way of global easing. the decision came at noon london but no news conference from governor mark carney this time around. meanwhile, lawmakers are looking for clarity on the timetable for

life into a 2015 tweet from trump, himself, calling paul who was then his republican presidential rival, a spoiled brat without a properly functioning brainul, i know the 2016 race was painful for you since you were such a big loser then and now. with a dismal 4.5% in iowa. no surprise since your motto seems to be terrorists first, america second." paul swiped back, tweeting, "hey, liz cheney, i feel like you just might be mad still about when candidate trump shredded your dad's failed foreign policy and endless wars." just a few minutes later cheney again, "weeird, i don't see you on stage here, rand paul. oh, right, my bad, you had already lost." she added " #weirdrand." needling, "while they might exist, i haven't heard after o war liz cheney didn't want us to get involved in." cheney never backed down tweeting late thursday, "take a breath, rand paul. i vote with real donald trump 97% of the time. you have a "d." maybe sit this one out and spend some time thinking about all your anti-trump votes." through is all, the president stayed silent on twitter. not offering a single tweet in response to the fighting within his own party. randi

he was the political brains behind a pro-russia, pro-putin political party in ukraine called the party of regions. paul manafort famously took the leader of that party who was previously known as a kind of inarticulate, menacing, thuggish guy, an organized crime figure. his real claim to fame was in chicken smuggling, i kid you not. but paul manafort gave victor yanokovic an extreme makeover, he basically donated his own haircut to victor yanukovych and own stylish shiny suits. he remade this guy in his own image and built this pro-putin political party under yanokovic into the ruling party in the fractious and very corrupt country. now, eventually manafort would get kicked off the trump campaign after "the new york times" first reported on documents that were discovered in ukraine which showed manafort being paid more than $12 million off the books by yanukovych's political party. even then , from there on out, t was clear he was going to sort of leave a trail behind him, right, even long after manafort was gone from the trump campaign and trump was already serving as president but before manafort was

was the political brains behind the pro-russia and putin ballot cal party called the party of regions. manafort took the leader of that party who was known to be the th t thugish guy. paul manafort cave yanukovych an extreme makeover. he remade this guy in his own image and he built this pro-putin under yanukovych. eventually manafort would get kicked off the trump campaign after the new york times reported documents discovered shows that manafort being paid more than $12 billion off the boo books. but, even then like from there on out, it was clear he was going to leave a trail behind him. even long after manafort was long in the campaign, before manafort was indicted, his ties to ukraine were still making national news for this country. it was weird that manafort got picked to be running a presidential campaign in the united states in 2016. the ukraine ties, after he was fired, they did seem like real liabilities for somebody who is brought in and led alone one resulted and putting a candidate in the white house. there was this article. the new york times, july 2017 by mike mcintire. he was in debt to business entities linked to two kremlins, linked to two oligarchs.

the undercover king of pop, tedder is the musical brains behind the jonas brothers comeback this summer as well as working with artists such as sir paulis talent for song writing, the result, pop chart perfection >> ryan, we're so happy right now. we're happy to be sitting with you. we're happy to be in your aura we went through that piece and we talked about all of these stars who you write for too, beyonce, adele, sir paul mccartney, how does that thing work do you write a song and go this has got beyonce's name on it, or do they knock on your door. >> it's both sometimes with beyonce, she'll bring you in, play you stuff, get you inspired or take a song she has that's not finished and finish it. for mccartney, you're with him i can't believe i just said that not finished and finish it. for mccartney, you're with for sir paul you're with him, starting something from the ground up thomas rhett, you're in the room, ground up. jonas brothers, you're with one or a couple of them or with "sucker," i had already done it, and walked in, you know what, i think you would sound better on this than me >> how do you decide whether to keep one or

> we had our brain rumble up the number of corrections and retractions by "the new york times," recent retractions that occurred, $0.06 president trump took office including stories on paulsian collusion, and of course trumps tax plan where they left out, they made in accounting error in a big piece about trumps tax plan. so where does that put us today? >> this is one of the reasons why the me this isn't all about a brett kavanaugh, because quite frankly as a business this is really bad for business for "the new york times." i think it's business suicide if you go for "the new york times" to continue to do this and go on this trajectory. i know a lot of people think it's all political, but you are really going to ruin your own company, you're going to lose your job for the sake of a supreme court member who is a tenured position and is not going to be impeached, not going to be. >> it also explains that? >> i don't know to me this is "the new york times" really making an editorial decision to pursue some of these stories and it really is a compounding effect and it questions the credibility and this isn't the paper that we saw ten years ago where they were the paper of