then there's paul colby, he's largely kept a low profile compared to his peers, but his 25 year career with the c. i a included work in russia, and when he does speak out, it's often about whether he seizes the inner workings of russia. however, his predictions are always the most accurate take. for example, this one published on february 23rd 2022. there is no threat from nato against russia. ukraine certainly poses no threat if a full scale or words or breakout and ukraine. i think, well, there would be an initial patriotic search to support troops in action once the true cost of that, in terms of casualties. and what it means for russia for the next decades, could mean the beginning of the end for putin. so what can we expect from this group of homeland intelligence experts? well, the planets for them to meet at least 4 times a year to discuss a wide range of ongoing national security concerns that include terrorism and emerging technology. as for what power these experts will have over determining us policy that still remains to be seen. and homeland security has recently been busy

appointing former director of national intelligence and former cia director john brennan and paul colby. joe, seems like fox in the hen house to me. >> joe: it is reward for a job well done. you got to love washington. swamp that rewards those in powerful position who knowingly lie as these intelligence officers did. how else would they know hunter biden's laptop was a product of russian disinformation just days after the "new york post" story broke. it is like a coroner determining a cause of death without examining the body and team biden is so arrogant they know they can make appointments without scrutiny for most of the media focused almost solely on donald trump. congrat congratulations, these folks will be working for the biden administration. frankly, they have been for sometime. >> carley: american people are complaining, 63% of americans have little to no confidence in the political system. some say it is working somewhat well, 4% say it is working extremely or very well. numbers not surprising, people are saying something needs to change. >> joe: unsurprising, carley. trust in

visual ends about colby 19 keep telling the stories and remembering what happened during cove and 19 so that we still are able to for action and continued action against future candidates. paul, i saw your reacting as well. looks like you might have wanted to add to uh, to attached go saying there's please go ahead. yeah, i think public health that's always suffered from the problem that when he does its job, right. nobody notices it when it does its job. no rice then people notice and i think that's the issue. there are numerous episodes over our recent history, all the money being saved on public health initiatives that was then. busy by the costs of coping with the outcome, the up until the public health of the prevention a gabriel mentioned too. but you, let's stop. you know, the, uh, the, the cut box in the us. a 2 bed 2 lucy's program in the few decades back was followed by a very much more problems with cubic lessons that call sambal than the original savings for cheap. so yeah, it is a problem. a politicians generally have short memories. uh they uh yeah they uh, we will use the same with the faxing. it's always easier to box the people to against influenza the have