guidelines as th us is changing their focus to an intelligence and risk based approach however to paul dano also said the little band that was going to be sticking around for a while that's on the agenda i say we should do something about those extra body scanners as we've spoken about several times on this show the body scanners are invasive they're ineffective and it's time for the v.h.s. realizes that but from the way they're talking they're going to be going back to the drawing board to come up with better techniques for what we currently have at u.s. airports and you know might be a ways from now but at least our government has realized what we've been saying all along that all of these added security measures especially the body scanners are not the best methods for protecting americans i would all of the upcoming anniversaries nine eleven the ten year anniversary of richard reid a.k.a. the shoe bomber it's nice to know the d.h. as is finally taking a critical eye to some of the developments in airport security so even a hint from the government that the t.s.a. might be moving away fr

actor paul dano cast to play a young karl rove in the upcoming film "college republicans."edly beat out "transformers" actor shia lebouf for the role. >> younger picture of rove there. does academic achievement bring oval office success? republican presidential hopeful rick perry doesn't think so. a lot was said after his college transcripts were leaked from texas a&m but does being book smart, getting good grades translate into a successful commander in chief? joining us is a senior editor of the daily college. good morning to you. >> good morning to you. >> rick perry, went to texas a&m. i don't care where he went to school but c's and d's, one in gym, a d in economics. should the american voters be concerned? >> well, certainly, he didn't have a very distinguished academic time at texas a&m. but the question is does academic performance really translate into the oval office? does it matter if you did well in school to being a good president? and certainly, modern history, that doesn't seem to be exactly the case. >> and then you look at -- i guess you look at president r