i mean, we -- we initially gotten a introduction from paul graham who is the founder of white -- >> did you it through -- >> exactly. yeah. and i think the -- i mean, this space is obviously interesting to people like that a product we can show to people. what's interesting, you are not pitching, you know, you're not pitching a vague idea. likes here the product, here's how it works, how what the people using it says, more concrete to get in front of someone. >> can we talk about citizenship and immigration and whatnot for a second. you are a guest in this country? >> i am. >> you employ how many people? >> 120 people now. >> 120 people. you are creating wealth for americans. but you are here at the pleasure of the united states government. >> mm-hmm. >> and sometimes, you have candidates, i'm assuming, that you have -- want to hire that you probably can't. >> yeah. >> that bothers me as an american. we want more success stories like you. >> no, it's true. this is -- immigration is pretty personal for me. i chose to come here, first for college and then moved out here and it hasn't alwa

that was dr paul graham founder and president d p r m. time now for a very quick break but stick around because when we return it chris martenson of prosperity dot com will be on the show the energy expert is telling us about some unexpected consequences of high energy costs and in today's big deal i'll be joined by our tea arabic correspondent remote. sitting down with me to discuss the latest economic happenings in and around the middle east and remember you can see all segments featured in today's show on you tube it youtube dot com slash boom bust our teeth and on flu but before we go here are a look at some your closing numbers of the bell stick around. would you like me. you want your comedy news and some t. want your comedy news to be a bare fisted no holds barred fight to the dad. but the truth vampire fighting into the next of the corporate elite billionaire freaks well they're going to run and. that's what you get with my new show projected tonight. and star wars. and the finish line at the marathon. looks. like. part. of the. w

we've seen this from officials like paul bremmer and lindsey graham, commentators like bill crystal, but at the top of the list was this man and his they're daughter. >> al qaeda is -- >> dick cheney and his daughter liz announcing they're founding a new organization to advance american foreign policy, let that sink in for a minute. they wrote a wall street journal op ed condemning president obama's approach to iraq. it includes lines like this, rarely has the u.s. president been so wrong about so much, at the skens of so many. you see the spectacle of dick cheney weighing in on iraq. at one level, it feels the society would have done something formal to sanction this person for what he did, and place him outside the bounds of polite society. in the absence of that, this man is speaking from a mountainside in a funny hat rather than the oval office. this is a man whose family name has been so tarnished, he couldn't get his own daughter through a primary campaign in his own party in his own home state he had to go back to the drawing board to find her another job, which he's achieved

paul wolfowitz. on guitar you kidding me, how does this guy keep getting booked on television, lindsey graham. >> this stubborn-headed president who thinks he knows better than everybody else, who withdrew troops. stubborn-headed, delusional, detached president, but that's the last bad thing i'm going to say. [laughter] >> jon: my wicked tongue. [laughter] [speaking with southern accent]: i'm so bad... at foreign policy. now pour me another julep. >> jon: like any terrible band, they're nothing without their lead singer, old johnny rotten. johnny rotten judgment. his advocacy of the iraq war was legend, his sophisticated knowledge of the region unparalleled, in that it did not parallel with anybody who had knowledge of the region. >> there is not a history of clashes that are violent between sunnis and shias, so i think they can probably get along. >> jon: that is a true statement if you don't count the long history of violent clashes between sunni and shia. he's right, throughout history there are lots of examples of sunnis and shias peacefully sharing power like we were going to have them do in iraq

program today. , with of the union" today another appearance by eric cantor. , majorindsay graham general paulaton, and adam kinzinger of illinois. nation,", "face the with rance priebus and tom donnell on. showsnday network tv talk are on c-span radio and are brought to you as a public service by the networks and c-span. the lineup? noon.the press" begins at followed by "abc's this week," at 2:00. "fox news sunday" at 3:00. 4:00, "face the nation." all on c-span radio here in the washington, d.c. area, nationwide on xm 120,lite radio channel download our free app or go online. you for that, nancy. shiite forces push back in the rack, and from "the hill," we ise this, the president trapped between two international crises at a time when the military is facing cutbacks in the public is weary of foreign engagement. the story is available online. , john kerry, state pressing russia to halt the flow of tanks and heavy arms into ukraine and to help broker a cease-fire after the shutdown of military transport planes." with all of that, specifically with the rack, diplomacy, military options, what sh

the bush appointee for a time resumed iraq, paul bremmer is calling for american boots on the ground in iraq. senator lindsey graham is calling for air strikes and american backed reorganization of iraq's government. the second ranking house democrat, congressman steny hoyer says the president should be considering missile strikes in iraq. former deputy secretary of defense paul wolfowitz calling for president obama to take military action. yes, this is the same paul wolfowitz who in 2003 when asked what the iraq war would cost told congress not to worry, that iraq would be be able to finance its own reconstruction because of its vast oil wealth. a war that ultimately cost $2.2 trillion. a sum that is singularly america's debt and our obligation. it should distress any american that so many of our politicians and journalists are so free and fast with their calls for military action again in iraq. while offering no answers as to why they would expect a different outcome this time. why would we again take up iraq, al qaeda as our national burden solely without a clear line drawn between our sacrifice and cost and our

rand paul does not like the word isolationist, but he does have a more libertarian kind of view of the world. he is responding to him on the one side. lindsay have the graham, john mccain winning that is more hawkish about aggressive foreign-policy. president obama is trying to address those critics as well. he is trying to find a middle ground between those two extremes. int: let me put these events perspective. the wars began in the bush administration. what is your take away? guest: here we are, 13 years later. it is striking that we are still debating and grappling with the issues that had their roots in the bush era. so may things on the front page like the nsa and gathering images of people around the world, that has its roots in the bush era. is hugelybate today important. we need to understand where it came from. book one quote from the that is relevant to any president, in the summer of 2008, the thing that pressed -- .urprised him about the that is what obama is experiencing. the idea the presidency is magnified. it is only one part of our government. it is constrained by other factors. each president comes in thinking that they will be the maste

grahams of the republican party. we hadn't heard a lot from the more libertarian wing. rand paul finally spoke out. let's hear what he had to say. >> what's going on now, i don't blame on president obama. has he really got the solution? maybe there is no solution. >> maybe there is no solution. i mean, goldie, is it possible that -- to my eyes, a military solution is out of the question, not going to be helpful anyway. what the president's hoping for, i think what we're all hoping for, is a political solution that can bring the sunnis, the shias, and the kurds together somehow. is that even a realistic possibility? >> you know, we should be looking at a political answer here. and what has to happen, what we need to have happen is for a political decision to take root an you have a more unified government, or as some of my colleagues are speaking about today, you know, maybe it's time iraq is broken up by its sectors rather than trying to unify very dispaired audiences who have been disunified over centuries. so i think that the political answer really is the right one here. whether or not military

paul's side. >> look at public opinion. most of the elite republicans, the john mccain's, the lindsey grahams are in the more hawkish group with dick cheney. we should be more involved with iraq. we should do something. the president isn't doing enough. the notion that paul said last week which was the president should not be blamed for this, maybe -- >> so striking and so unusual. >> usually every problem in america is blamed -- everything is blamed on obama by republicans. the paul group, the isolationists or the noninterventionist group, if you look at paul, it's growing among republicans and democrats as well. that's where things are moving. that's why a vote in congress to get involved in iraq will never pass. the white house knows that as well. if it comes to a vote in congress, that means we've decided basically not to have any kind of air strikes because congress is not going to approve that. >> eleanor, listening to that interview with jim mcdermott, one of the knocks on congress, not just with this but in general when it comes to foreign policy, is congress often the reason a president goes to something and does some

paul bremer thinks? we have one group talking act ex-bush administration officials trying to rehabilitate their image as people who got us into iraq and people like lindsey grahamlly ayotte beating the drum before the bush administration for action in iraq. is this something that people who are the future of the republican party, people who might be running for president in 2016, do they have eagerness to pick this fight or is this people who are directly invested in the bush administration record? >> you know, i think certainly, you know, brerm or judith miller, these kind of folks coming out of the woodwork are definitely doing some rehabilitation of their own image, i think. and i think that the positions that lindsey graham or john mccain are taking are not necessarily those that a lot of the sort of people that we're see right now running for president on the republican side are going to take. i don't think you're going to see, for instance, rand paul come out and really get aggressive and hawkish. he's all been an isolationist necessarily but certainly someone who does not become someone who's militarily involved in these conflicts. there are those of the

rand paul does not like the word isolationist, but he does have a more libertarian kind of view of the world. he is responding to him on the one side. lindsay have the graham, john mccain winning that is more hawkish about aggressive foreign-policy. president obama is trying to address those critics as well. he is trying to find a middle ground between those two extremes. int: let me put these events perspective. the wars began in the bush administration. what is your take away? guest: here we are, 13 years later. it is striking that we are still debating and grappling with the issues that had their roots in the bush era. so may things on the front page like the nsa and gathering images of people around the world, that has its roots in the bush era. is hugelybate today important. we need to understand where it came from. book one quote from the that is relevant to any president, in the summer of 2008, the thing that pressed -- .urprised him about the that is what obama is experiencing. the idea the presidency is magnified. it is only one part of our government. it is constrained by other factors. each president comes in thinking that they will be the maste

rand paul does not like the word isolationist, but he does have a more libertarian kind of view of the world. he is responding to him on the one side. lindsay have the grahamjohn mccain winning that is more hawkish about aggressive foreign-policy. president obama is trying to address those critics as well. he is trying to find a middle ground between those two extremes. int: let me put these events perspective. the wars began in the bush administration. what is your take away? guest: here we are, 13 years later. it is striking that we are still debating and grappling with the issues that had their roots in the bush era. so may things on the front page like the nsa and gathering images of people around the world, that has its roots in the bush era. is hugelybate today important. we need to understand where it came from. book one quote from the that is relevant to any president, in the summer of 2008, the thing that pressed -- .urprised him about the that is what obama is experiencing. the idea the presidency is magnified. it is only one part of our government. it is constrained by other factors. each president comes in thinking that they will be the master