. >> general, i am paul hughes from the u.s. institute of peace. it was a wonderful overview of the strategic situation in pakistan. as you have indicated, the truth has been seen through the history of counterinsurgencys, these tend to fundamentally reshape societies. in the case of pakistan, the there will be a need to 3jeter national priorities to the things you have mentioned, improve governance, will flock, economic situation than what not. .. in your personal view, do you think that pakistan will reassess its role through the nuclear world? and whether it will continue to pursue new nuclear weapons or is it satisfied with what it has now? or will it take new steps to join the contents ocomprehensivn treaty? >> we're working to eliminate all nuclear weapons by 2013. down to zero. i've been supporting that strongly. everybody else in pakistan, i guess, should be supporting that, and everywhere else, too. south asia is a region, perhaps the only one, or one of the very few where missile material production, deliver systems improvement is an ongo

. >> general, i am paul hughes from the u.s. institute of peace. it was a wonderful overview of the strategic situation in pakistan. as you have indicated, the truth has been seen through the history of counterinsurgencys, these tend to fundamentally reshape societies. in the case of pakistan, the there will be a need to 3jeter national priorities to the things you have mentioned, improve governance, will flock, economic situation than what not. .. everywhere else, too. but your question -- south asia is a region, perhaps the only one, one of the very few when material production, a delivery system improvement, is an ongoing process. pakistan starting from its earlier nuclear-free zone has lately pushed for a strategic restraint regime. it did so earlier, it will do so again. this to bring about the recession of this production and further testing and so on. india thinks that china and so on -- it becomes a tried- elective process. even that is being discussed. there is work going on on changing the situation from such an active, ongoing thing to a

. >> general, i am paul hughes from the u.s. institute of peace. it was a wonderful overview of the strategic situation in pakistan. as you have indicated, the truth has been seen through the history these tend to fundamentally reshape societies. in the case of pakistan, there will be a need to requigeure national priorities, to the things you have mentioned, governs, rule of law and other things. if pakistan has a robust nuclear arsenal and program. reports are suggesting that there are two new nuclear reactors built by chinese crackors that have no lengthsal grid connected to them, which suggests nuclear proliferation. do you think pakistan will reassess its role in the nuclear world and will continue to pursue new weapons, or is it satisfied with what it has now? will it take new steps to perhaps join the test ban treatsy family? your thoughts, please? >> i am here with this global zero growth. we are working to eliminate all nuclear weapons by 2030, global zero. i have been supporting that strongly, and everybody else in pakistan i guess should