paul ingram is a senior research associate at cambridge university center for the study of ex distension risk. he says there's good reason to be worried about the safety of the plant. those 2 key areas of concern, one is the reactor itself, which is well protected with concrete term protection around it. this is designed for impacts from civil act, croft and the like and, and the shell is unlikely to penetrate that to any significant degree. having said that, damage to that, to that protection, could be quite serious in the sense that continue with the continued damage could, could compromise the, the safety of the rate of the reactor and lead to a leak, which would have significant impacts locally, not necessarily across europe we're not really talking about turnover type situation, but there are more vulnerable parts of the site, including the spent fuel, palms and, and the supply of power and electricity. and, and if there is a hit, then we could see a chain reaction. i mean, in the sense of a cascade of problems which could lead to failure if the plant so there is a real significant