i'd like to have you meet my business partner, paul kramer. lemonis: okay. ou to meet marcus lemonis. lemonis: how are you? i'm marcus. nice to meet you. paul: thank you for joining us here. lemonis: absolutely. how do you share roles and responsibilities? paul: operations for me. i have restaurant background. lemonis: what are the numbers here? paul: we're doing $4 million. -i can go back and -- -mike: no, we weren't that high. -paul: don't think so? -mike: nope. paul: we did, yeah. lemonis: so the numbers aren't crystal clear? -paul: yes. -mike: yeah. lemonis: i don't know what just happened. paul answers my question, and then mike says he's wrong. and quite frankly, they both look totally lost. -how many stores exist today? -mike: there's five stores. bob farrell started the company back in 1963. when we started the company, he came up to the opening. he goes, "guys, you did it. -this is farrell's." -lemonis: oh, that's awesome. paul: my uncle would take me to farrell's growing up. and farrell's is part of families. it was part of mine, and it's part of mi

the measure ultimately tended to prolong the occupation as paul kramer argued. in practice, what came to pass with the democrat in the white house wasn't all together different from the policy under the republican since the turn of the century, even if the democrats had introduced this language of stable government as a requirement of a forthcoming -- an independent status. and in this respect, i think we might say that 1916 was no turning point when assessed by the effect of the jones act or by the logic of continuing to deny independence based on assumptions of filipinos' limited fitness for self-government. thanks. [ applause ] >> hopefully you'll all keeping a tally. maybe. no. not quite that simplistic. we'll keep moving forward. so next up we have professor nancy mitchell. she is professor of history at north carolina state university. her book "the danger of dreams -- german and american imperialism in latin america from 1895 to 1914" talk about a german threat to latin america, which loomed large in 1916. she contributed a chapter to u.s. and europe. her

kramer, a moscow correspondent for "the new york times." andrew, thanks for joining me. cnn just confirmed actually that paulort is now under investigation in ukraine for receiving illegal payments. this goes directly to what you were investigating. what led you to this investigation, what led you to this handwritten ledger? >> well, thank you very much for having me on the show. before manafort was manager of the republican party campaign in the united states, he had another job. that job was adviser to the pro-russian political party in ukraine. now, i covered the revolution in ukraine two years ago and a curious document surfaced. one of hundreds thousands of documents that came out of the government and released and stored in various locations in kiev. the thinking is if there was mention of manafort in some of these documents that had been released, there was likely to be more. so we set about investigating manafort's business activities, activities in ukraine, based upon this evidence which had come to light during the revolution. >> paul manafort, he says he has never received any money, that millions

pages of handwritten notes, paul manafort's nameau appears 22 times over the courso of five years, totaling $12.7 t million. "the new york times" moscow correspondent andrew kramerne of the reporters who wrote the story, and he joins us nownd from moscow. andrew, thanks for being with us. andrew, first of all, tell us exactly what it was that they found. what were these ledgers, whereed was the money coming from, what were the payments for? >> those are all very good questions, thank you. the ledger is called in ukraine the black ledger, a collection of papers, perhaps 400 pages, as you mentioned, with handwritten notes describing payments from the party of regions which is a pro-russian political party that paul manafort worked for before becoming manager of the republican campaign this year in the united states.te the outlays described in this ledger included legitimate campaign expenses such as advertising, travel for candidates, and also illegal activities under any definition such as payments to the electoral commission of ukraine, members of the electoral commission receiving moneys from this same fund.u according to ledger, there is also mention of paul m