1/20 of the generosity paul newman had my life would be fulfilled. >> jake landed" josh and sam". >> do it. >> but his break came starring alongside his sis maggy in darney darko. before long in blockbusters like 2004's "the day after tomorrow". >> i hate it when actors talk seriously about big summer movies. >> and then the career making turn alongside heath ledger in "brokeback mountain" earning the actor his first oscar nomination. >> what we got now is brokeback mountain. >> to me the best part of making movies is the preparation. that's the part i love. >> from then on jake was really able to guide his career picking choice roles in jarhead and end of watch. >> and, of course his recent golden globe nominated turn in "night crawler" which he admitted to using food deprivation as motivation. >> will this be on television? >> the idea of lou being someone hungry i wanted to feel that feeling. it doesn't matter what anyone is saying you have one goal and it's primal. >> gyllenhaal looking hungry for blood in the upcoming "south paw". >> i was trying to train myself to be unconsciou

as far as who's done it right, i always go back to paul newman. was a guy who gave so many towering performances in so many fantastic films and yet gave more than he got. charlie: it's about living life. paul: he was very good at his job and he loved his job. i came here and i was picked up and driven here. and wearing this suit that i did not pay for. i have someone put makeup on my face and i'm here to talk about a movie i was in. it's important to remember 99% of the world does not care. [laughter] we remember that. put it in its place. when you look at that and see what it is you should do, -- charlie: children help you realize that too. paul: absolutely. i work with some hospitals and couple of charities. it's the best. it's the best grounding thing. not to mention i have two of my own. it really does hold up a mariner. charlie: -- holds up a mirror. charlie: "ant-man" opens in theaters july 17th. back in a moment. stay with us. ♪ sçkw?c?coó charlie:charlie: 1971 stanford university professor gathered 24 student volunteers to partake in what

. >> as far as who's done it right, i always go back to paul newman.ou know he really was, i think -- i loved his movies so much, and he was a guy that gave so many towering performances and so many fantastic films and, yet gave more than he got. >> rose: this is not about being a movie star. this is about a life. >> and that's what we should try to emulate. i think it was important because he was very good at his job and loved his job but, you know i think about, like, you know, i came here, i was picked up and driven here, and i'm wearing this suit that i didn't pay for. i had somebody put makeup on my face which made me look good on television. i'm here to talk about a movie i was in. it's important to remember 99% of the world doesn't care. so, you know we need to remember that and put that in its place, and then when you look at your life and look at what it is that we should do, it's all that other stuff. >> rose: exactly. and use this part. >> rose: children help you realize that, too, don't they? >> oh, yeah. absolutely. i mean, you know i work

paul have the already murky requirements to prove insider trading been made even murkier this year? >> absolutely no. i'd say quite the opposite. i think the newman crystal clear in fact that in order for there to be a benefit, a tipper has to give a tip and he has to do so for a benefit. think back to the movie "wall street" from the '80s where james spader's asked to give corporate information ahead so his friend can trade. he said wait a minute what's in it for me? that's exactly where we are here, where the supreme court is basically saying there has to be something in it some tangible benefit or quid pro quo that the tipper gives in exchange for a tip. rather than saying it is more murky, i'd say it is quite the opposite. >> we'll find out what the supreme court says. we could get a ruling next year on this. we'll see what it does. if the supreme court, paul upholds the overturned ruling if that makes sense for our audience, they uphold the overturned ruling, if they said basically with the defendants is that going to make it much more difficult for the federal prosecutors, for the doj, et cetera to go after alleged insider trading cases? >>