is the sum of the great paul samuelson, an economist. i put it there. he is holding a commonly-held view and he is reporting accurately, if you ask people in a poll, they think you can fix this problem if you stop foreign aid or cut something remote from them when that is not the case or close to it. because also there ultimately, i'm going to come to that conclusion that we talked about, sure we can, the american people do still have self-government and the elements that make it possible at the core of our character and address openly and honestly as free-born citizens, they can understand the facts of life we are looking at. they can understand that we cannot do everything we would like to do for absolutely everybody all at the same time when we're broke. and they can support choices and maybe the postponement of things until a better day that we would like to do. i'm not equating the two at all. complexity. and we have had that conversation for seven years. and you don't get everybody on board, but a broad majority of the citizens of indiana have sai

economic it was brought to the united states in the 1930's and '40's by a very famous economist paul samuelson of the people like that. a prop these ideas to the united states. however, and my work and trying to do is show that there's a slight difference between the policy, economic policy. an economic policy. what economists actually do it is different than policy. economists said different ideas and models of a fundamentally different and we hear about in the policy will. if it a year for the market arer the state. we hear this all the time with the two-party. the tea party is often said were for free-market. obama is more socialism of the state over planning are some kind of interventionism. that is the policy discussion. is very different from what actually goes on. economists are very much interested in a different kind of discussion about the model different things. the model things. the way they do this is a actually is in the state versus market a deal. equally efficient in the malls. trying to separate the policy discussions from the economist's ideas and what they're trying to do. w

they are not related. >> he gets real tired of people saying are you the son of paul samuelson. >> i won't label in that way again. i'm sure i read it. >> i used to say it myself. >> i don't think i put it in the book, did i? >> yes -- no, you did not. [laughter] >> and by the way some of you democrats have a chance to confront your governor if you have a question. are you going to ask a question. come on. come on. editor of the paper. studyingjunior anthropology and editor of the student newspaper. what is something that you think the next governor of indiana needs to make their priority? >> alicia it's a fair question, i will give an answer to you and say that first of all, certain priorities don't go away, because we didn't come close to finishing them, continuing to build the best possible climate of job growth has got to be job one. and we made a lot of headway and on top of everybody's list now but very frustrating to be highly rated as indiana is and at a time when national economy has basically stopped. i have said to people, you know, getting on top of those ratings and the