so, paul woolverton, welcome. this case started out as something very different from what it ended up. we mind us what the original case looked like. >> originally, it was a sexual assault case. the general was accused of forcing his accuser, a captain under his command, of giving him oral sex at times when she didn't want to, and this was in the war zone in afghanistan. >> woodruff: and what happened to that case over time? >> well, the general fought it very hard and his legal team fought very hard and they pushed and pushed to get the sexual assault charges dismissed on the allegation that the accuser basically they said she was lying. the prosecutors, of course, kept at it over time, but in the end they arranged to plea bargain, and the sexual assault charges were dismissed, but that still left other charges including adultery and misconduct and maltreatment of the accuser. >> woodruff: explain what happened to the prosecution's case because, as you point out, there were some very serious charges leveled, orig