my name the paul wormer. i have a letter i sent to supervisor mirkarimi's office way back at the beginning of the process addressing some concerns and i would like to have that entered into the record and distribute it to them. this when you look at frem mis, the -- when you look at the premise and the intent of the legislation, it is wufrl and there's strong support. when you look at the language that executes it, it ends up falling short in meeting the intent in many ways. a significant issue is the visibility from the street requirement. we are talking about neighborhood commercial districts and active street fronts. and yet the language in the legislation requires that nothing be vizable from the street and doors and windows be closed so it is not audible. is that really what you want in a commercial and neighborhood district? this is not, as has been pointed out, a rave. this is where the entertainment should invite people in and right away we have the key piece in the legislation that contradicts that.