clinton only had the one deal going with paula jones. on the presidency was quite different. >> i don't know why you would get a benefit from the fact that you're sued a lot as opposed to only once. but we will see. >> we do have a country to run. >> let me ask you asking. because of all the writing, thinking, the president musing i may pick four judges during my tenure. is that a possibility? it has to be. and what do you think the likelihood and the impact will be? >> well, it is possible. my rule on supreme court appointments is those who know don't tell and those who tell don't know. so we don't -- ruth ginsburg is 84. briar is 79. 84 is not the new anything. 84 is 84. >> easy. my mother loves you, but she's watching. she's only 60. when she hears people talking about the octogenarians, she will give you one good karate. >> they are all at the top of their game as far as i have been able to see. >> it is possible not probably. >> certainly not probably for four. one or two more is more in the range of probable. >> i'll spare you unti

there was one occasion of course the civil litigation brought by paula jones, when he was under oath in a private law office here in washington, d.c. so it will depend on the negotiations. but i think that is a logical step in bob mueller's eventually completing his investigation. >> do you believe that bob mueller has or will see the president's tax returns? >> that, i don't know. it would be a logical step, but it really depends always on the evidence that you have and then your assessment of the evidence with your able team not only of lawyers, but if analysts. and my experience, in whitewater, we depended on superb financial analysts from both the fbi and the irs, these are professional people, they are not motivated by partisan politics, they're simply trying -- whatever their politics are, they leave that, the way it's to work and i have every confidence that bob mueller will see to it, that politics are left at the door. bob happens to be a republican. he's a fact-and-law person. and think that's what we're going to get, an honest assessment of the facts. >> a legal hypothetic

because i mean, it -- how damaging, because remember paula jones, it -- >> led to his impeachment.ly be a while until he is deposed. there will be other discovery first. gloria allred has filed a very voluminous discovery request. i think the judge narrow somewhat, but i think the judge, he or she, i don't know the gender in this case, will give some discovery in this case and then it'll proceed to a motion for summery judgment. and if that's denied, i expect there'll be a -- >> gloria? >> and it's a woman judge. we had a male judge assigned to the case first. he recused himself for reasons we do not know. and that's fine. and then it was assigned to a woman judge in new york supreme court. >> ed, let me ask you, nearly a dozen women have accused donald trump of sexual assault or misconduct. you don't think there's any truth to any of those dozen or so women? >> one of the things phyllis, my old boss used to talk about, when you run for office at a hiel level, she ran for congress twice, i ran for congress, you learn a lot about how the game is played. with donald trump having run

we respond with the case of paula jones versus president clinton. the u.s.cated no man is kbov the law. >> the supreme court did allow paula jones trial to proceed. president trump says this is a different circumstance. miss allred seeks defaming information. how could the president run the country if faced with broad discovery. >> people who oppose me often will attack me personally, which is usually a sign that they don't have a good argument against the merits of my argument. >> whether it's in entertainm t entertainment, politics. we have someone admitting to being a sexual assaulter in the oval office, there has to be a recognition that we must stand against this kind of action that is so sexist and misogynistic. >> the president pushed back from the rose garden against the reports of the subpoenas on his campaign. >> all i can say is it's fake news, it's fake, it's made up stuff. it's disgraceful what happens. that happens in the world of politics. >> the president's lawyers are fighting the defamation suit brought by summer. they're saying the only pu

we respond with a case of paula jones versus president clinton, which went all the way up to the u.s.e u.s. supreme court indicated no man is above the law, even the president of the united states. is not above the law. >> reporter: the supreme court did allow paula jones' sexual harassment lawsuit against president bill clinton to proceed, but trump's lawyers argued this issuance of a subpoena is a different circumstance, stating ms. all-rid has served a far-reaching subpoena on the trump campaign that seeks wholly irrelevant information intended to harass the president. indeed ms. allred herself has questioned how the president could run the country if faced with broad discovery. >> any attacks on me, this is not new. people who oppose me often will attack me personally, which is usually a sign that they don't have a good argument against the merits of my argument. >> now, it is possible that the new york state court could rule that the subpoena needs to be narrowed considerably or that the defamation case itself should be held until president trump is no longer in office or that it

you can see with clinton, the nott about bill clinton was monica linsky, the point was paula jones.rought to him by state troopers. it is obvious ill clinton has something to do with the rape culture, which we know from india and the arab world. the point is this is the tip of a global iceberg, which we see occasionally in the cases like harvey weinstein. every day women are raped, not only by women of -- by men of color, but by their friends, their articles, the friends of their mothers, it happens every day in families all over germany. i have to say it is a work -- rape culture. melinda: we are essentially talking about the degree of choice that women face and also what constitutes duress, force. let us briefly hear a statement from a wom who was a victim of sexual abuse in the workplace. >> i quit pursuing acting as a career. i have told parts of this story told me very few people over the only a very few people over the years. i felt so powerless. i didn't think anyone would believe me. i was nobody. why would they? ♪ , what would birgit you have advised her to do differently?

to the point with him was paula jones he had a woman brought to him by straight state troopers to his hotel room and then wanted to force her to have sex with him it's obvious that bill clinton has something to do with the rape culture which we know from india which you know from the arab world. the whole point is that this is the tip of a global iceberg which we occasionally see in the in the case like avi weinstein or in every day women are raped here and there raped not only by men of color they're raped by by their their eight by their fathers by their step fathers by the uncles by their friends of their uncles by the friends of their mothers happens every day in families all over germany in that and i've worked myself into this more i was saying it is a right to say i want to bring something i said to the debate and then i'll give you the word out of that but we're essentially talking about the degree of choice that women face and also what constitutes duress force so let us briefly hear a statement from a woman who was a victim of sexual abuse in the workplace but i quit pursuin

but the supreme court of the united states held in a civil setting in clinton versus jones, the paulaorbin jones, unanimously that the president of the united states had to respond to lawful process, including a civil lawsuit. that strikes me all the more so if the criminal laws have been violated which is obviously a big if. >> in the clinton case, you made a determination, correct me if i'm wrong, that a congressional impeachment process was more suitable than the indictment scenario i just asked you hypothetically. in the current case, i want to make crystal clear, judge, is there no showing that would suggest the potential at this stage of such an indictment. so i'm asking it hypothetically. but in the russian probe scenario, would would be better suited, a congressional impeachment scenario like with clinton or an indictment scenario? >> well, i certainly prefer and it is a hypothetical and may it never happen to the state of the country we want to have the policy disagreements sort them out out. for the president of the united states, it is in fact preferable for the matter, dep

try telling all of this to paula jones or juanita broderick. although monica lewinsky was consensual, the young intern. hillary clinton took literally millions in dollars in donations from countries that treat women horribly. literally tens of thousands of dollars from harvey weinstein who hosted a birthday party for clinton back in 2000. remember when she took those millions from these countries that practice sharia, for her family foundation? saudi arabia and qatar in the uae and kuwait and other countries that treat women horribly? atrocious human rights records. oppressive laws against women, gays and lesbians are often put to death. kristin's and jews persecuted and she took tens of millions of dollars. hillary, give the money back. the left is now trying to absolve themselves from guilt after decades of close association with monsters because they had the right political views. remember, actions speak louder than words. hollywood, the mainstream media, hillary clinton, many other politicians -- they can all try to lecture us about how to

paula jones, she works at the national organization for women. she was told i'm sorry, you are in bed with the wrong people. she told me she called gloria aldrich's office twice and they didn't even return the phone call. >> sean: the clintons got a pass. because they are liberal. all the things i've been thinking about the money they take from countries that have sharia, the clintons got a pass on all bill clinton's garbage and they all knew that was true. >> sean, one more thing, there's a book called no one left alive too. it was written by douglas brinkley, a very respected historian. by christopher hitchens. he said that bill clinton has been accused of >> greg: >> ser twice but three times. >> sean: it didn't stop them -- not a peep out of hillary. go ahead. >> hillary clinton said over the last year that these kind of women make these accusations should be believed. harvey weinstein in the first day of this scandal was telling people this was going to blow over because he believed as a good liberal throwing his money around that he would b

it was about the paula jones case, because there were multiple women that came forward, gennifer flowerssky. and the problem with hillary and what george stephanopoulos wrote about in his book, "all too human," it was hillary's strategy in approach in an attempt to destroy bill clinton's accusers. for monica lewinsky, it wasn't necessarily the consensual relationship that she had with hillary's husband but the attacks after the fact as a feminist, as everyone is pointing to other people or hillary wants to ignore what happened before, the question is, when you are not admitting, someone like this doing it for three decades, how many more women were thrown into the harvey weinstein volcano while everybody was marching in washington against donald trump? julie: most people would feel sorry for someone whose husband did what bill clinton did, but hillary clinton was responsible for trying to get these women to lip it, because her husband was president and she wanted to stay in the white house. so whether she was a woman scorned or not, she didn't have these women's back. now she has the bac

her husband, a powerful man, settle ad lawsuit with paula jones for $850,000.f she is willing to wink her eye at hush-hush money back in the '90s, why are we surprised her winking at this kind of hush-money today. trish: i said this before. feminism is a loaded term. i am a feminist because i believe entirely in the equality of women. women should have every single opportunity and ability to make their own choices in life. no one looks down their nose, if you decide to stay home to raise your kids, whether you decide to be career woman. feminism, should be about embracing women. but i don't like this. when you just embrace the kind of woman that you think a woman ought to be. >> we've seen this from hillary clinton. we've seen it from michelle obama. if you don't think the way they think, that group think, then all of sudden you are not a real feminist. you're not even a real woman who is thinking for herself and voting for what is important to her. you know, as a young woman, i think it is, it is, you know, says that i, i'm not smart enough to make my own deci

he paid $850 million to paula jones.uits going on dating back 35 years with president clinton. for her to act like, oh, that has all been disapproved. it wasn't disapproved. it was actually proved. now i got into a little bit of, i guess a media attacks this week for something i said on "fox & friends." i just want to mention, what i said was, that i don't recall that anybody has ever successfully proven anything donald trump has actually done. did he say some despicable things? yes. he admitted that he did. but there were a bunch of women who just before the election lined up and said he had done things. interestingly, not one of those cases went forward. everyone of them disappeared as soon as the election was over. you have to wonder about that. so i was shocked that hillary clinton went there. melissa: right. i think the point of it is not about president trump. if i were her, i wouldn't be wading into those waters. that is not, that is not going to be a good issue for her. as soon as she starts talking about that, y

know that a sitting president can be sued, because that was established without question in the paula jonesstates supreme court said even though it's potentially a distraction to a sitting president, people are entitle the to their day in court, so the lawsuit can proceed. whether this lawsuit has any merit and whether a court will allow depositions to go forward, discovery to go forward, that's a separate question. it's a harder question. >> but jeffrey, you agree, jeffrey, i mean, you're smart enough to know, you agree that when someone threatens that they've been harassed, doesn't have a suit and then files against a public person saying i was defamed, that's the kind of classic long shot play, right? and when gloria all red of all people runs out to do media, what we know is what the president is saying this is a publicity stunt meant to distract from the person weinstein, who is at the heart of actual assault. he admitted -- weinstein admitted, said it's consensual -- >> hien wine has nothing to do with this. it's totally irrelevant. >> how can it not? >> you're con naturing two issues

paula jones suit was allowed to go forward during the clinton years. >> correct. >> which is important precedent. one of the connections here to weinstein is the way in which the response to the women is attacking them. in 2015 the first time the weinstein allegations became public and when the model mattress accused him. immediately you saw stories attempting to discredit her. she's made other allegations. it seems to me this is part. m.o. the threat of that is what kept weinstein's secrets for so long. >> absolutely. that's how the power dynamics work. they're not about sex, they're about power abuses. it wouldn't -- sexual harassment and sexual power abuses wouldn't happen if they didn't have the power to suppress, hire, fire, make or break the working lives of the women -- when we're talking about this in a professional context, that's one of the things that is in question as well as physical power. the fact that women are not believed, that they're shamed, that they're made out to be untrustworthy, crazy, vindictive, have axes to grind, that's part of the threat. and the fact that

katheen willey.li obviously paula jones. they stood by him.e was in the oval office with a 22-year-old girl. >> tucker: why do they still wield moral authority? >> they don't. trump has called them out. he has called them to the carpet on the stuff. >> tucker: they intimidate the hell out of corporate america. >> they do. they throw it back on trump because of the billy bush tape and all that. t i think women now today, especially today, they've gotten stronger, smarter. i hope after all of this when we say let's have a conversation, let's have a real honest conversation about how all of this goes down and how when you have power and you have money and you have an oscar dangling in the background, you can get away with a lot. >> tucker: when you're giving money to the politicians. c >> frankly there were men and women who knew this was going on for a long time. >> tucker: what i find confusing is here you have michelle obama on tape g describing harvey weinstein as a wonderful person. even if you didn't know -- i worked for harvey weinstein br

trump went after the access hollywood tape when president trump went after bill clinton and brought paula jonesy for the sins of bill clinton. the issue of whether or not she was an aider and abetter i leave to the viewer. >> david: he had an admitted sexual accuser. >> todd: that is the textbook definition of slander when you accuse somebody of having committed a crime. as a yale educated lawyer she should know that. >> geraldo: she's also a wife and someone who lost an election because of her husband and because of anthony weiner, she lost and i think that is the burden women candidates bear going forward. >> david: that's so yesterday. those three words she used, geraldo let's address that to your point. admitted sexual accuser. not just like she said about bill that was so yesterday. she lost, now these three words being tossed at president trump. >> geraldo: david whether it is in politics as in the case of the clintons, whether it's in the news media as in the case of some of our own colleagues and some of the others who have fallen by the wayside, or whether it is in hollywood, sex haras