jane pauley will be the first guess ever at the head of the table.s next. >>> the question i have most dreaded has been what are you going to do next? the very idea of next was terrifying. and then one day i realized it wasn't anymore. in fact, i had begun to find it intriguing to toy with the notion of change. what might be next. ever since that day almost six years ago when i came home from the hospital with two babies, change has been less intimidating. >> jane pauley has been a legend in this business for a long time. graced the sets of the "today" show, nightly news. we're honored to have our first guest on our brand-new set, author of the book "your life calling." thank you for being here. do you want to talk about the set? >> love new stuff. i love to redecorate. i totally bought the subway thing. >> how are you at the head of the table? >> good. >> we made this just for you. >> that sound bite you used of me talking about change and what's next? as you get to be in television as long as i have, you tend to see yourself recycled a lot. i have

so judge pauley accepted that argument and that's the argument for metadata. because the nsa couldn't tell where those phone calls were coming, were coming from, then you put everybody's metadata in the united states. so you have it in one place and then you can go through it. so you don't have another 9/11, but that's their argument. so again, these are things that are somewhat complicated. they are not usable in a soundbite on television but they are critical to this whole issue of metadata and needs more writing about it in the journal community. a lot of this, whistleblowers are saying are you kidding? you know we put all this technology out there and you can't tell where a telephone is coming from? everyone has caller id. but the story is not over yet. there's going to be a third bite of the apple. we had the split decision, the judge in new york and the judge in washington. there's another case coming up that's called the church of los angeles versus nsa. i vital role in this myself. it's brought by the electronic frontier foundation, a case that focuses

so judge pauley accepted that argument. that is the argument for a message dated because the nsa could not sell well it -- or those phone calls were coming from. you had to collect everybody's minute data in the united states so that you have it in one place then you can go through it so that you don't have another 9/11. that is their argument. again, these are things that are somewhat complicated, not usable in a sound bite on television, but they're critical to this whole issue of better data and it needs more writing about and a journalist committee because a lot of it, are you kidding? you know, we put all of this technology out there and you can't tell where a telephone is coming from? so -- but the story is not over yet. there is any -- there is going to be a third bite of the apple year. we have a split decision, the judge in new york, the judge in washington. well, this another case coming up called first unitarian church in los angeles this is the nsa. a played a little role in this case myself. the electronic fron

so judge pauley accepted that argument. that is the argument for a message dated because the nsa could not sell well it -- or those phone calls were coming from. you had to collect everybody's minute data in the united states so that you have it in one place then you can go through it so that you don't have another 9/11. that is their argument. again, these are things that are somewhat complicated, not usable in a sound bite on television, but they're critical to this whole issue of better data and it needs more writing about and a journalist committee because a lot of it, are you kidding? you know, we put all of this technology out there and you can't tell where a telephone is coming from? so -- but the story is not over yet. there is any -- there is going to be a third bite of the apple year. we have a split decision, the judge in new york, the judge in washington. well, this another case coming up called first unitarian church in los angeles this is the nsa. a played a little role in this case myself. the electronic fron

. >> okay oregon needs to win at pauley pavilion because they make not make the tournament.nd adams sat down by coach alfred and what the ware brothers did on the final play of regulation. where was the oregon "d." >> dana altman and company can go, ooh, we almost gave that one away. in the end, oregon, quack, 87-83 and have usc on saturday. >>> big for the tournament hopes for the ducks. >> they have to beat usc on saturday. >> okay. >> i'll be at that game hopefully. >> that's all we got. back to you. >> good morning. >>> guys, thanks. >>> an incredible soccer goal. this happened at a high school game in georgia. it is our "play of the day." >> yeah, check out andrew deltak of harrison high school. he hit that goal from 67 yards out. >> man, oh, man, that's like an nfl field goal. look at that thing. the opposing team by the way came back to win it 3-2. that is awesome. >> that is so cool. >>> up next, "the pulse," the countdown is on for the big oscar night on abc of the so who are the favorites? who are the long shots? >>> plus, workout buddies. why the president and vic

it is the issue that judge pauley sort of hung his hat on on his decision. and it all centers on this house in human and this person appeared. i will guarantee you i am the only person in this room that has actually been to that house. this was the operations center in the men. it was very controlled of his plots from. i went there because i did a documentary for pbs. we did a documentary and the nsa and 9/11. so i went to that house, and we saw it, and that was where the first hint of 9/11 came from. again, these were all the issues that feed into judge paulis decision, the comments of the director of the nsa. this is -- what i am about to talk about here is the key excuse for having limited data program. what happened was in december of 1999 the nsa -- while, the nsa had been listening to this house for years because it was the house where he would call to set up his terrorist operations. it is the house where they attacked the u.s. -- set up a plan for the u.s.s. cole, the u.s. embassies and so forth. the nsa was listening to that house. december of 1999

jane pauley makes history. >>> and our local cycle viewers know we like to talk about ourselves.g different? >> something. >> crisis in the former soviet space. many fear it could be the start of another cold war. there's an arrest warrant now for the former ukrainian president. he's currently on the run, presumably in his stronghold in the russian-speaking eastern section of ukraine. as richard engel explains, he's wanted for the murder of 70 of his own citizens during thursday morning's protests in kiev. >> reporter: now the question is, who fired the shots? who gave the orders? the initial narrative, what we saw here was demonstrators who were armed with bats and molotov cocktails broke out of the square and started to charge the police lines. the police were pulling back and they were firing. this we saw. new video, however, suggests there was also a far more deliberate part of this narrative that the police and security forces were also deliberately firing into the crowds apparently with sniper teams. this video shows a large group of security forces armed with sniper rifles

(whistling) >>> hey, pauley, what's up?ll street. but after the financial crash of 2008, everything changed. now young wall streeters face a new world of regulation and a watchful eye. how much has really changed? a new book titled "young money" follows the lives of new wall street recruits as they struggle to survive in a post-crash world. kevin ruse, great it have you at the table. >> thank you for having me. >> talk to us about how the culture of wall street has changed, especially for the next generation. >> it's night and day. when i started writing this book in 2010 it was just after the crash. i died i wanted to follow eight first and second-year investment bankers at goldman sachs, jp morgan, the big firms. i wanted to learn why are these guys still interested in wall street? what's the appeal? i followed them around, went to parties. >> how were the parties. >> they were okay. >> a lot of banker parties are not as good as they were in the wolf of wall street days. generally, the culture is not as crazy as it was in

and the other was judge william pauley in new york. don't know if it made any difference, but i grew up with judge william and went to law school with him. but we never agreed on anything in 30 years. he's a very conservative judge and the plaintiff is very conservative. so judge leon came with a conservative conclusion, after the same conclusion that i came to. and that is what the government should not be able to do this kind of activity with metadata. the judge polly came to this conclusion that he had a split decision. in my opinion he just has to get rid of that whole idea of the government collecting metadata. the edward snowden case is a perfect example of why. there was edward snowden who worked 6000 miles from the nsa. he was a contractor and in his 20s. but he was able to spend almost a year, it seems like, actual trading 1.7 million of the most secret documents from the nsa. and the nsa did not even know about it until he showed up in hong kong. and so do you want to trust the agency with all of your data? i don't particular

. >> hey, pauley what's up. no, everything's fine.mously likeable charming obviously incredibly smart, one of the most gifted public speakers i'd ever met, which makes a lot of sense. obviously this is a guy who's incredibly persuasive to people. i picked up on that right away. for me personally i had a lot of similarities with jordan. i grew up in brooklyn. he grew up in queens. we were the same age. >> did you grow up with drugs and prostitutes? >> no, that's where we differed. >> what was it -- >> his childhood. i totally understood that desire to grow up and be somebody and make a lot of money. actually we had die very subsequent paths. i was working for merrill lynch. i was on the trading floor the day the markets crashed. i went to l.a. to be a writer. >> the stars are incredible but can you address the criticism that you glorified this really bad guy essentially and there's a lot of sex and a lot of drugs in this film in a really kind of dirty way. >> a lot of people were hurt. >> it was not my job as a writer to take a positio

judge william pauley came to the office, you had that split decision.n my opinion you just got to get rid of the whole idea of the government collecting metadata. the ed snowden case is a perfect example of why. here was ed snowden who worked 6,000 miles from nsa, he was a contractor, he was in his 20s and yet he was able to spend almost the year, it seems, 1.7 million of the most secret documents from nsa and nsa would not even knowing about it until he shows up in hong kong. do you want to trust and agency with all your data? i don't think they want to do that. see what happens with target. there are people out there that really want data that will pay a lot of money for it and if somebody at nsa starts doing the honorable thing which is being a whistle-blower wanted to be a criminal, they got all that data. the less you keep in the hands of the government the better is but one of the key issues which we will talk about here, somewhat of a complex issue, but a key issue in the entire metadata discussion. it is the issue is that judge pauley hung his h