remember what pavel florensky said about this icon there is rublev's trinity therefore, there is a god before 1917. she was in kazakhstan. trinity cathedral trinity sergius lavra 29. entered the collection of the tretyakov gallery by and large . we all know very well that at that time churches were closed, churches were destroyed, churches were poured. and, of course, a transfer from three neighboring laurels to the museum at that moment. salvation for the ruble icon since then, it has been in the tretyakov gallery, but the time has passed, the persecution of the church has stopped, the people began to come to the temple, they began to baptize children, they began to get married, drink the dead , restore temples. and finally, on may 15 of this year, the ministry of culture decided to transfer the rublev trinity church, the appeal of the fedey patriarch to the president was published, and the president signed a decree that this icon be transferred. surely you know perfectly well what he began to wear after that. what a battle started. how long was the meeting? how many songs have been w

that’s not what we’re talking about, if it’s about something else, it’s about marking words of pavel florenskyrstand that neither daniil the black nor theophanes the greek would ever touch the board to write an icon. if they knew that this icon would be in the museum, the icon is a materialized connection between man and god, this is what florence means, she must work. can you imagine how much human energy she absorbed into herself, how much she saw, how she was charged with a human feeling of suffering and love and would say. well, how is it? she can be lost. yes, she can die. yes, they can steal him, yes, but precisely for this. there is a connection between the state and the church in order for the state and the church to provide the necessary conditions for the icon to be safe. icons must return to the temple together with the people , and the state and church are responsible for this treasure. yes, it's money. yes, this is the time, yes, this is a necessary work. yes, if the positive scales the value of an icon as a work of art and the value of the horse as a spiritual force. i don't thin

doesn't matter, now it's not about this yet another thing about that, mindful of the words of pavel florensky. we must understand that neither daniil cherny nor feofan a greek would never have touched a board to paint an icon. if they knew that this icon would be in the museum, the icon is a materialized connection between man and god, this is what florensky means. she must work. can you imagine how much human energy she absorbed in herself, how much she saw, how she was charged with a human feeling, suffering, love and would say. well, how is it? it may also be lost. yes, she can die. yes, it can be stolen, yes, but for this. there is a link between the state and church in order for the state and the church to provide the necessary conditions for the icon to be safe . the icons must return to the temple together with the people and the state church. responsible for this treasure. yes, it's money. yes, it's time, yes, it's necessary work, yes, if positive scales value. an icon as a work of art and the horse's values ​​as a spiritual force. i think that there can be no question here, you under