special to say, pavel hated catherine’s entire legacy, including fashion, so the fact that he made a remark to little sasha’s nanny, this it is clear that it concerns alexander pavlovich evil epigrams on him, well-known, unlike even the west, which honored the tsar for the victory over napoleon, pushkin, well, at best, considered him a crafty and hypocritical person, and as for the victory over napoleon, he has phrase: accidentally warmed by glory, one can argue with pushkin’s position on this matter, but... one way or another , the attitude towards alexander i was exactly like that, with nicholas i everything is much more complicated, because in addition to the personality itself. that one autocrat, another autocrat is one thing, but the political platform itself, so to speak, autocracy, has it already worked out its resource, or can it also serve to benefit russia, and finally, are russia and the russian people even ready for this radical change ? political system, strictly speaking, all these questions, as i imagine in mikhailovsky , were spinning in pushkin’s head, so to speak, and like any person, he matured gradually, and rethought a lot, here is pushkin wrote t