recently , pavlo gorbasenko, judge and head of the economic court of the kyiv region, once again had an interview regarding the suitability for the position. consideration of this issue is taking place after, uh, it was postponed for the previous time to find out additional information. last year, the commission postponed the final decision on gorbasenko and waited additional explanations and documents from him. so at this meeting it was necessary to make a final decision. the question is whether he will remain in the judge's chair. during this time, the public council of virtue discovered new facts of gorbasenko's dishonesty and made a new conclusion so that the members of the commission could study it. veronika kreydenkova, a member of the state council of ukraine , filed a motion to postpone the meeting. as a matter of fact, there should have been a review and completion of the review of the issue of his suitability for the post, but the public integrity council proposed to postpone the meeting, so that we voted on a new decision yesterday. in a new conclusion. it is said that the

pavlo gorbasenko, the head of the economic court of the kyiv region, owns elite real estate, sky-highroperties. fortunes and practiced fictitious divorces, made illegal decisions that had signs of raiding. judges dmytro kostenko and andriy fedorchuk, kyiv district administrative court. fedorchuk, in particular, is known for canceling the nationalization of a private bank and suspending the renaming of the uoc of the moscow patriarchate. it is the same, for example, judge dzyuba, about whom there is information that his wife has russian citizenship, this is judge otrosh, who is at a hearing in kvalivka. the mission allowed itself to say that these are actually ukrainian bodies are not guilty of not ensuring the inviolability of the borders in crimea, which has millions, well, millions of unexplained property and so on, all these judges with such a position will be able to avoid the end of the qualification evaluation and keep their positions to themselves. there is no doubt in the anti-corruption center that by making a decision in the case of judge usatoy, the grand chamber has attack

pavlo gorbasenko of the kyiv region.nted at least five decisions of the grand chamber of the supreme court, which earlier in the same grand chamber indicated a completely different position, they indicated that it is really necessary for such a decision to be supported by the entire plenary composition of the highest qualification commission of judges, and the decision of the panel itself is not enough. the decision of the grand chamber of the supreme court contains a number of dangers for judicial reform. according to preliminary estimates, it can help about 180 judges who have already received negative conclusions from the public integrity council to remain in their positions. this is the decision of the grand chamber helps these particular 180 people now avoid this procedure and in fact they already automatically remain rated, if actually. this practice and this decision in the grand chamber, the higher qualification commission and the vrp will now take as a basis and say that we must apply this decision to all these

district court of kyiv maria zelinska and the judge of the economic court of the kyiv region pavlo gorbasenkocounted at least five decisions of the grand chamber of the supreme court, which earlier the same grand chamber indicated a completely different position, they indicated that it was really necessary to support such a decision in the entire plenary. composition of the higher qualification commission of the court.