>> narrator: erroll's parole officer is mark pawlich. f's been a parole officeror 18 years. >> so what was your crime over there? >> burglary. >> burglary, is that kind of your thing? >> no, not at all. i was... for drugs. >> and drug of choice is? >> heroin.ou >> mr. brantley, you just read, had a long, long history and if you're in this business long enough, you know the chances are at some point it r wir its ugly head. so, now he's on your watch, soou you got to make suree dotting i's and crossing t's, that's for sure. so what we're gonna do today is nditions now.e you review these so what i need you to do is read every one and make sure you understand each condition an then sign at the end. >> narrator: among the conditions of his release, erroll will have to undergo mandatory dr testing, and he's barred from contact with prior victims, which includes his gifriend, katherine. >> and is long-term planning with your mom at that address? >> no, i want to go back home. i don't live with my mom, i actually live with my girlfriend katherine. >> that's why i'm asking. a>> but there was a

. >> narrator: he doesn't tell officer pawlich, and misses his next appointment, another violation of parole. >> all right, so here's our date on mr. brantley. >> narrator: it takes pawlich almost a week to figure out where erroll is. >> on the 31st he was due ine to report to me, anddn't show up. unbeknownst to us, the day he came in here he had rendered a urine dirty for cocaine and opiates, so, he left part of the story out. phone's going straight toic ail. he's using. he checked himself into a detox program. i give the guy credit for going to detox and going into a program, but the way he handled it was completely wrong. so basically his violations arei thy urines, not reporting to me that he's no longer living at his residence. he's really hanging by a thread right now. >> when we thi about what we ask parole officers to do, we ask them to be social workers who help reintegrate people into society. they're also supposed to be the police officers, they're supposed to be the people who catch parolees in any rulen violatd then reporting it out. the question is, should the person who