tenants we think is critical all pdrs tenants are not the same; right? i realize those are a small space but therefore important what is going to happen there on all those fronts we want to continue to see this be a real template how we work on the projects and thanks again to the department. >> hi my name is mary sorenson want to thank the director john for putting together those meetings they were very helpful yes and i agree with peter this is a great template to have in terms of large projects i'd like to ask too that we've seen a lot of projects building go up in the neighbors complain i'm i i'd like to ask that you make sure you leave a double or trip pain in the windows and insult senate /* point of privilege but in response i'd like to when you let those projects in that they can built like the effort concoction of noise thank you very much. >> rick hall i wanted to reinforce what peter said about the process because it is really refreshing to i thank the project sponsor for working in eric on the cayuga issues even before this week's meetings an

are arts use are both. >> if the pdr yes, sir. if the pdrs legislation passes it will more double 60 percent more between 25 and three hundred square footage of art space and as is director said it will be increased as the case with prop c when that increased the affordability this proposition were to pass increase the amount of art space within the space. >> i stand corrected more than that be 4 thousand outside and 3 thousand indoor close to 7 house total of art and cultural space onsite. >> part of it is a cu it is modest bus if there is a small part rh3 that make sense but it is it would be appeal able to the board of supervisors and things have been known to change in course this a very good project we should get on the road to moving forward i had a couple of more things to say questions were brought up trying to do all the sorts of things of increased affordability this was not eligible for the state affordability bonus and the local was not in place yes, sir this was one reason it was not able to have a higher degree of af

are arts use are both. >> if the pdr yes, sir. if the pdrs legislation passes it will more double 60 percent more between 25 and three hundred square footage of art space and as is director said it will be increased as the case with prop c when that increased the affordability this proposition were to pass increase the amount of art space within the space. >> i stand corrected more than that be 4 thousand outside and 3 thousand indoor close to 7 house total of art and cultural space onsite. >> part of it is a cu it is modest bus if there is a small part rh3 that make sense but it is it would be appeal able to the board of supervisors and things have been known to change in course this a very good project we should get on the road to moving forward i had a couple of more things to say questions were brought up trying to do all the sorts of things of increased affordability this was not eligible for the state affordability bonus and the local was not in place yes, sir this was one reason it was not able to have a higher degree of af

are arts use are both. >> if the pdr yes, sir. if the pdrs legislation passes it will more double 60 percent more between 25 and three hundred square footage of art space and as is director said it will be increased as the case with prop c when that increased the affordability this proposition were to pass increase the amount of art space within the space. >> i stand corrected more than that be 4 thousand outside and 3 thousand indoor close to 7 house total of art and cultural space onsite. >> part of it is a cu it is modest bus if there is a small part rh3 that make sense but it is it would be appeal able to the board of supervisors and things have been known to change in course this a very good project we should get on the road to moving forward i had a couple of more things to say questions were brought up trying to do all the sorts of things of increased affordability this was not eligible for the state affordability bonus and the local was not in place yes, sir this was one reason it was not able to have a higher degree of af

use which didn't exist at the time pdr into a pdr use just so the moratorium could apply. as you heard in previous hears, retro activity is rare and difficult to do, and this kind of bureaucrat initiated retroactive legislation needs the an uncertainty in terms of administering the code and reasonable expectations that propertied owners can have. if we continue this, it would give the va [inaudible] it's unfair to property owners and ten mantises who could not have foreseen that a march, 2014 planning code change would alter the use of the building based on space that was previously vacate and had that use no longer existed, and the nov relies on building perms that does not [inaudible] that printing was present in the building from 1967 to 76, three building permits were issued in 1967, 1970 and 76, the 1967 and 1970 pert were for warehouse and storage use, the 1976 permit was aproved from planning to upgrade an existing office printing use. according to the nov, because the 19ed 67 and 76 permits were for the same applicant which is not true and would have no bearing on

i run a unfortunate only 6 thousand square feet of pdrs and 14 artists that have studios and events space the community can use as a gathering spot that we have international artists come and go with 6 thousand square feet we're looking at three hundred plus that will disappear where the artists are been in the warehouses on potrero hill and the mission and the eastern neighborhoods does talk about and our general plan and the arts components talks about preserving arts so why are you allowing one and 9 square feet that could be artist space name u i'm saying do some industrial space but a build out of 50 - so this whole melted shed is feasible economically feasible that has been dismissed by the planning department that has not deny their job and you need to stop looking at our foenlz and vote to support this appeal thank you >> thank you. >> next speaker, please. >> good evening supervisors peter culture action network i want to make a contempt in 3 areas that are critical to why we support this appeal and it's important for i want to reiterate a simple math error the mood shed wa

space we're looking. >> the pdr. >> trade shop. >> pdr. >> (multiple voices). >> trade shop our the parking a. >> the discussions to expand that we're looking to reconsider to make that better for the kind of work they're kind of small 6 areas they were 8 hundred square feet each so we're going trying to make sure - we were looking doing a trade off maybe reducing if pdr more and more affordable how to create them do that. >> anything else good parking was a bigger issue we were looking reducing parking. >> to data to more affordable also. >> so project sponsor one last times and looks like a motion and a vote or another motion and a - and are you close enough with the punch list looks parking the traffic issues and which are related and this affordability one of the speakers mentioned the tax accurate finance for increased no affordability what's your thoughts. >> thank you for the opportunity to address those concerns or suggestions ; right? let's talk about tax credit financing about too years hiring someone previously employed to help us figure that out solution tax credit exper

i run a unfortunate only 6 thousand square feet of pdrs and 14 artists that have studios and events space the community can use as a gathering spot that we have international artists come and go with 6 thousand square feet we're looking at three hundred plus that will disappear where the artists are been in the warehouses on potrero hill and the mission and the eastern neighborhoods does talk about and our general plan and the arts components talks about preserving arts so why are you allowing one and 9 square feet that could be artist space name u i'm saying do some industrial space but a build out of 50 - so this whole melted shed is feasible economically feasible that has been dismissed by the planning department that has not deny their job and you need to stop looking at our foenlz and vote to support this appeal thank you >> thank you. >> next speaker, please. >> good evening supervisors peter culture action network i want to make a contempt in 3 areas that are critical to why we support this appeal and it's important for i want to reiterate a simple math error the mood shed wa

i own a pdr business. i want to see pdr around. i make my living from historic buildings. in my opinion this existing structure has no historic value at all. it is a rusted out old claptrap it is an eyesore. you should see the new development has so many nice elements it maintains a nice façade and there are numerous benefits i would hate to see these numerous community benefits fall by disapproving this eir. thank you. >>thank you next speaker please. >>hi we are currently tenants in this old core van warehouse because we were booted out of hi we are currently tenants in this old core van warehouse because we were booted out of pierce 74 and art project and work that we do on delancey street and this organization is good enough to rent to us and we are still in favor of tearing this down because we did look at the amount of below market rate housing because to us, delancey street is incredibly important because there's almost no place to move after you graduated delancey street coming from anywhere. this is a particularly frightening part of 16th st. and it's not safe to

i own a pdr business. i want to see pdr around. i make my living from historic buildings. in my opinion this existing structure has no historic value at all. it is a rusted out old claptrap it is an eyesore. you should see the new development has so many nice elements it maintains a nice façade and there are numerous benefits i would hate to see these numerous community benefits fall by disapproving this eir. thank you. >>thank you next speaker please. >>hi we are currently tenants in this old core van warehouse because we were booted out of hi we are currently tenants in this old core van warehouse because we were booted out of pierce 74 and art project and work that we do on delancey street and this organization is good enough to rent to us and we are still in favor of tearing this down because we did look at the amount of below market rate housing because to us, delancey street is incredibly important because there's almost no place to move after you graduated delancey street coming from anywhere. this is a particularly frightening part of 16th st. and it's not safe to

space and taking away 21 thousands of pdrs and offering an art gallery not an a pdr use part of the art you actually make it like the pacific built factory first of all, it is tied to the mexican museum not part of project, and, secondly, not a pdr used by putting the art gallery on the ground floor it needs to be brought back to the table and talk about what we need 80 parking spaces not seeing any, on treat street didn't sounds like a very good use of space as well i'm sure a gym could go through and open up the amenities - put the amenities on the ground floor downstairs and leave the with ground floor for the pdrs theirs a lot more this developer honest at all i wouldn't sit down with him unless the mayor's office is sitting down with him, too. >> okay. does that conclude - the conclusions the 10 minutes. >> it's the 10 minutes. >> opening up for public comment (calling names) if i call your name line up on the right-hand side of the room (calling names). >> again, if anyone is in the overflow room come here. >> i the mission a latino cultural district between 22 and caesar chav

space and taking away 21 thousands of pdrs and offering an art gallery not an a pdr use part of the art you actually make it like the pacific built factory first of all, it is tied to the mexican museum not part of project, and, secondly, not a pdr used by putting the art gallery on the ground floor it needs to be brought back to the table and talk about what we need 80 parking spaces not seeing any, on treat street didn't sounds like a very good use of space as well i'm sure a gym could go through and open up the amenities - put the amenities on the ground floor downstairs and leave the with ground floor for the pdrs theirs a lot more this developer honest at all i wouldn't sit down with him unless the mayor's office is sitting down with him, too. >> okay. does that conclude - the conclusions the 10 minutes. >> it's the 10 minutes. >> opening up for public comment (calling names) if i call your name line up on the right-hand side of the room (calling names). >> again, if anyone is in the overflow room come here. >> i the mission a latino cultural district between 22 and caesar chav

while pdr and arch you shall be interchangeable we did not allow institutional community use and pdr are choose to be interchangeable this is just to ensure that we don't value one or the other and that we would protect them both. >>okay, mdm. chair may i continue? >>yes. >>the reason that asked the question is because you may recall in committee that the mayor's office of housing stated that they often have uses that are required under state law in place in the ground floor of the projects that qualify as institutional community uses and so this would be a conflict. >>may i respond mme. pres.? >>supervisor kim >>thank you. >>we have a complete exception per your request and supervisor tang for 100% affordable projects. i did put in an amendment that encourages these projects to replace as is, but again, we do not intend on conflicting with any project that the mayor has with these projects >>thank you because we have heard loud and clear from folks. the historic preservation exemption i think it makes sense to include it. i think that we want property owners of historic buildings to

space and taking away 21 thousands of pdrs and offering an art gallery not an a pdr use part of the art you actually make it like the pacific built factory first of all, it is tied to the mexican museum not part of project, and, secondly, not a pdr used by putting the art gallery on the ground floor it needs to be brought back to the table and talk about what we need 80 parking spaces not seeing any, on treat street didn't sounds like a very good use of space as well i'm sure a gym could go through and open up the amenities - put the amenities on the ground floor downstairs and leave the with ground floor for the pdrs theirs a lot more this developer honest at all i wouldn't sit down with him unless the mayor's office is sitting down with him, too. >> okay. does that conclude - the conclusions the 10 minutes. >> it's the 10 minutes. >> opening up for public comment (calling names) if i call your name line up on the right-hand side of the room (calling names). >> again, if anyone is in the overflow room come here. >> i the mission a latino cultural district between 22 and caesar chav

while pdr and arch you shall be interchangeable we did not allow institutional community use and pdr are choose to be interchangeable this is just to ensure that we don't value one or the other and that we would protect them both. >>okay, mdm. chair may i continue? >>yes. >>the reason that asked the question is because you may recall in committee that the mayor's office of housing stated that they often have uses that are required under state law in place in the ground floor of the projects that qualify as institutional community uses and so this would be a conflict. >>may i respond mme. pres.? >>supervisor kim >>thank you. >>we have a complete exception per your request and supervisor tang for 100% affordable projects. i did put in an amendment that encourages these projects to replace as is, but again, we do not intend on conflicting with any project that the mayor has with these projects >>thank you because we have heard loud and clear from folks. the historic preservation exemption i think it makes sense to include it. i think that we want property owners of historic buildings to

this in the fall and i was one of the lucky ones who found a studio in the mission you can see the pdr is very critical. the building i am in is actually was in where i would like to see hire renters get in there there used to be 40 artists in the mission and now there's only 20 artists left. there are remaining artist groups left in the city and i am really happy for this i spent the last few years working with supervisor kim's office to see what we can do to save pdr. it is not a very sexy thing to talk about i didn't even know what it meant with these things. a lot of different artists don't want to talk about is i'm nervous being up here right now i just rather do my artwork. but i'm happy to see this is something that is in the works i'm happy as moving forward [timer dings] so thank you very much. >>thank you. next speaker please >>hello supervisors my name is scott kuyper. i manage an art studio in thatthe cell neighborhood and i a would like to continue to see the same protections over the years a number of arts groups convened with the legislators to form a emergency arts disp

is to purchase a pdr and if we have the offset in lieu fees will explain this and we may move forward with amendments such as that. colleagues, i do ask for your support. i know that supervisor campos is not happy with the process but if the supervisors can pull their weight with this process this is not the only ballot measure going in november that can be passed by this board. in fact my colleague supervisor wiener introduced neighborhood police control and we can pass this here control and we can pass this here at the board. i think this is a perfect example of legislation that this board could certainly pass and implement without having it embedded within our ordinance or our code by the voters. and in fact, neither of those measures that i alluded to today do allow for amendments to this board if there were changes that need to be made or that we need to be more in depth or if there are changes to the police or changes to homeless and those are written into stone and they cannot be changed unless we go back to what the voters. so if we need to argue about what legislation should

is to purchase a pdr and if we have the offset in lieu fees will explain this and we may move forward with amendments such as that. colleagues, i do ask for your support. i know that supervisor campos is not happy with the process but if the supervisors can pull their weight with this process this is not the only ballot measure going in november that can be passed by this board. in fact my colleague supervisor wiener introduced neighborhood police control and we can pass this here control and we can pass this here at the board. i think this is a perfect example of legislation that this board could certainly pass and implement without having it embedded within our ordinance or our code by the voters. and in fact, neither of those measures that i alluded to today do allow for amendments to this board if there were changes that need to be made or that we need to be more in depth or if there are changes to the police or changes to homeless and those are written into stone and they cannot be changed unless we go back to what the voters. so if we need to argue about what legislation should

the pdrs will be in place it doesn't matter what happens has happened since over three years ago withhe first version the first versions the speculation has kicked in the building owners are not doing the pdr they expect to develop that property more intensely and, of course, the businesses and the arts groups will not be there this is exactly what happened on bryant a s l a i and funky they're building was lease was not renewed that development can't be - it would be housing this what you've done using the soma studios is your fault of this department you intend to up zone it no protection for the businesses or the artists there nothing you did nothing that's why we put on the ballot the coalition to say this as san francisco police commission ballot measure that sets requirements for pdr and arts he will e especially in the south of market district and what that includes two important things one an incentive a reduction for truly affordable space the other things you've not delivered and said how you will the affordable space and secondly, a flexibility to be amend provide there is