c-2, pdr, that's -- >> okay. so in the areas that they had wn originally as of right, got it. >> it's going to clarify downto, not pdr because we don't allow s retail in pdr and several easten neighbors and south of market d. >> so you'll know, you're requil the applications to go to a plag commission for a hearing. >> maybe affirmative d.r. is tht move. if we start with mandatory d.c.n back down to affirmative d.r. pile' defer to miss elliot. >> i want to redo the division e police code so you can understae administrative side related to e article 16, it says documents, t the point of application. applicants must submit how the applicants engaged to advise nes of the intent to apply for canns business permit and to solicit n the proposed good neighbor poli. applicant's community strategy t include written notice to neighs within 300 feet of the premisese applicant's intent to open the s at that location, neighbors cane input and shining sheets for mis held. all materials and notices develd distributed to neighbo

the others are downtown and pdr districts. >> it would be great to know exactly where that is so i know the c-3 but besides the c-3 what other areas don't require 312 notification. although my sense it is based on amendment that just went in, that supervisor sheehy put into both files if mcds automatically become adult use cannabis, is it correct to say there will knob notification? because there will be no conversion application necessary? >> i think that provision is to allow a temporary license to operate. they still have to get their land use approval. they'll have a temporary license to operate as an adult cannabis retailer and still have to come to get their neighborhood notification. >> there is no neighborhood notification required in the c-2 and perhaps some parts of my district considered pdr. i'm trying to clarify what kind of neighborhoods don't require the 312 notification. >> supervisor peskin: i said earlier i fully intend thoo that we that we put notice in for c-2, c-3 pdr, everybody gets noticed. s that a threshold issue and i'm also going to suggest that, i'd like to d

given that's not a pdr zone, i'm assuming that is not necessary. >> supervisor fewer: right. >> can we do a call of the chair because i'm not aware of the next meeting. i believe we need to issue a fees as there's an administrative fee being established. >> supervisor ronen: we will continue this item to the call of the chair and supervisor yee to schedule as soon as possible. >> thank you very much. >> supervisor ronen: thank you. this item is continued to call of the chair. are there any other items, mr. clerk? >> clerk: that complete the agenda for the day. >> supervisor ronen: this meeting is adjourned. thank you. >> okay. thank you very much, everyone, for being here. i'm assembly member phil ping and 57 was for all of us who spend time driving underneath 101 or 280. you see many spots that we wonder what could we be doing with these parcels, other than seeing them. i think the city was able to envision this many, many years ago with the skate park and dog park, which the city leased for 20 years at $4.8 million. and our bill allows the city to work with caltrains at a 30% of mark

connection to the bay that's been lost to the residents for 100 years, art spaces, creative spaces, pdr, and primarily, it's going to be a beautiful space for everyone, the kind of thing that you demand our departments create, so we're very proud that we kept faithful to your project for the city, and with that, i would like to introduce the mayor who has been instructal in seeing this through to the end. mayor lee. >> well, thank you, elaine for not only your leadership, your work here at the port and to all the staff and commission because the port's really an exciting place. a lot of things happening, and i want to let you know that i'll be working very closely with you as we talk to the public about one of the most important infrastructure projects that the port's going to lead, and that's of course the protection and rebuilding of our seawall because that's something that we will find very near and dear if we get information out. but the port has become not just a place for business, it really is a place, because of this leadership, byron and all the others working, ben, mr. benson

so that includes a discussion of again, things like how much office, how much pdr, how much hotel, housing in and within that is the balance of retail uses. one of the concerns that i've had within this regulatory debate is retail gentrification. and we know as supervisor cohen has brought up, this is a cash-rich, very profitable industry that we are such to regulate as it goes into adult use. and one of the concerns that i have is that we will start losing more than we already have, mom-and-pop shops, barber shops and services and amenities that all the neighborhoods need. what we're talking about today is the debate of what is a balanced approach to allowing what we all agreed to, which is a legalization of adult use cannabis and the continuation of medicinal marijuana access. and i have frankly been incredibly disappointed by the debate that we are hearing outside of this, both in communities that i feel like are firing up you know the tensions that may or may not exist in this quote, unquote, tolerant city where we accept everyone. i found it incredibly disappointing, some of the conde