the square footage of the individual uses in this case, pdr. we have factor factors that sayw many trips are generated by each dwelling unit. how many trips are generated by square foot for nonresidential development. those are those factors of trips generated. the factors that we have found base end on actua -- based on al studies shows those factors are lower. the other thing i want to say for easter neighborhoods we started withst mates how much development would occur with the rezoning that was our growth forecast. we did the best job we could at the time in 2008 when it was certified to say how much growth would occur. there's slightly more residential that's occurring in easter neighborhoods. but there's much less nonresidential development. the factors how many trips get generated by nonresidential it's much higher trips, more car care generated by nonresidential. when you combine those things with the factors and also, you have less nonresidential development today. all of those things lead us to say we had overestimated the trip relate

it could be about wanting to have more space on the upper floors at the cost of the pdr space and i am not inclined to support this particular ask. i don't know if anyone is here from project sponsor today, so no. >> i will say, supervisor, that a number of these key site inspections were particular to the particularities of the individual sites and what the trade-offs are for accommodating the program on the site with or without the land set aside, so that was something that the project sponsor in presenting their possibilities of how that could be accommodated made the case for and that is how it made it's way, but in general, yes, you are correct that the plan is also strengthening just the requirement that pdr have 17 feet. >> that is my point it seems to be a direct contradiction and you guys are asking for it to be strengthened in other areas. is that your understanding supervisor, that they are saying they can't do the affordable without this exception in? >> this was not how they requested the amendment. we amended so guff them discretion to lower from 17 to 14 feet this. made

a transit first neighborhood complete streets that connect through new -- retaining and supporting pdr business and improving parks and open space for growing population. i wanted to acknowledge this has been a model for interagency coordination. i want to implemen compliment te involved. i want to recognize the neighborhood outreach and the level of involvement from the neighbors in the dogpatch neighborhood. it brings historicall historicat land uses. allows the community not only to coexist but ultimately setting them up to continue to thrive. please call the roll. [roll call] >> supervisor cohen: thank you. this ordinary than is passed first reading. item 36. >> clerk: recommended as amended with a new title it's a of course -- resolution to water board to update the water quality control plan. >> supervisor cohen: supervisor peskin. >> supervisor peskin: thank you. i said most what i needed to say yesterday in committee. i really want to thank the three co-sponsors of this resolutioner. i want to extend my appreciation to the chair of the land use committee and the members of that

in the recent past where supervisor kim put forward legislation that would allow for conversions of pdrcels to affordable housing, recognizing affordable housing. i get it. i don't want to debate it, but i recognize, i mean we have a project before us. it is not before us. there is a project. puc is in ultimate control of the land. we are just saying if the supervisor wants flexibility like many zoning districts i don't see a huge problem. i would like to see it go forward. it would be allowed under supervisor cohen's legislation or the proposal to amend. >> right now it is being played out like they are disagrees with the supervisors over the watershed. the idea they are in lock step and they are going to do everything the board wants. it is played out now, not happening. i vote no. >> one final comment. mr. star did a great job. i would if i could direct your attention to 1-a that goes forward to say if you choose to support the legislation to allow housing on the site that you encourage the board to define what below market rate housing is. i will flag that for your consideration and

agreements includes rates for pdr space, guaranteed length of time. yet there's no protection in this case if fitzgerald leaves or is bought out. it's teaching them to contributed to the displacement of their community. 60 units, yet 17.5% affordable. that's a joke. we fought for 25% minimum affordable as part of the action plan 2020. thank you for your time. >> thank you. >> good afternoon supervisors peter papadopoulos. i want to hit a few key outlines here which will frame a little bit what we're hearing from other folks. the context -- we believe very much what is the equitable framework. we know that this project will add impact in certain ways. what happen are those impacts and have they beenaccounted for and mitigated. what will those potential mitigations be starting with the environmental. we saw this before -- i thinks cumulative issue. we see it's significantly over including its affordable units by a whole 60ers. second the question is, is the e.i.r. accurate? i think here we can see that the t.n.c.s through the san francisco county transp

statistics manual fifth edition or psychological basically analysis or diagnoses which is similar to the pdr, physicians desk reference that a doctor would use. i will shock the whole world and people hate me but i'm going to say i don't think psychology is as much a size as it is an art. i'm not going to subscribe to that. >> host: you are a psychologist. >> guest: not a licensed psychologist. that's a big part. i love the study of personality, the study of the human being in the system whether it's you, and congress are you and your family are you in society. i find those interesting entry development of the lifespan. that's what i i study most of y life. >> host: you are presuming ipad development along the way. it may be too much of a presumption treasure i enjoy studying those things. i'm a researcher by nature. i was born to devour information and try to make some sense of human behavior. but whatever level you'd like on that. >> host: when you started reading and researching -- >> guest: two or three. what are the ones out the minute i was able to get my hands on one. that's the day w