they are not a pdr. >> correct. the way the legislation is written at the moment, they have the ability after it is passed to file for establishment or change of use permit the same as any business would in the city, and from that point going forward they would be able to operate for an additional 10 years in the space after which they would need to find a new place to operate. >> except the staff is recommending three years. >> correct, staff recommends three years. if you take that today that program would be shortened to three years. >> just to add one additional piece of information there. the pdr1g does allow limited amounts of nonpdr uses. for example health services up to 5,000 square feet of health services. for personal services in a very much larger bucket you can have 2500 square feet. up to 7500 square feet worth of uses and tenants that are not there could legalize this program. there is an amount there that some benefits -- some te tenents could benefit from today. others from that would be subject to

there have been a lot of open spaces along the last 11 years so i understand that it is zoned pdr, but i don't see people knocking down the doors to get in there to do that sort of work, and yet we have so many people in the building that are not supposed to be there that are performing jobs that are important to the neighborhood and running successful businesses. as far as, you know, finding other places for us to go, it is cost probative. i'm the sole proprietor. the fact i can bring my child to work makes it even better for me. if i had a full-time job somewhere else i couldn't drag my son along. i would have to find somewhere for him to go. considering the 10 years would be helpful especially as long-term residents who would like to stay but doesn't want to be forced out by cost. thank you. >> any other public comment on this item? come on up, please. you already spoke, ma'am. you can't speak again. sorry. anyone else who has public comment, please come on up. >> good afternoon. i am helen hickman, i am a structural body worker. i have been a massage therapist for 27 years. i have

are based on development capacity including adopted plans and policies like accessory dwelling units, pdr programs, state density bonuses, home-sf, pipeline, soft site as well as major large developments. employment is expected to grow at historical rates at 5,000 jobs annually and population is to grow faster than it has historically. while in the future 35 years we see growth of 10,000 people annually. where will this projected growth go? supervisor alluded to southwest and this map shows the projected change where people live and work from 2015 until 2050. the vast majority of plan will oker in -- curin the eastern part of the city and the major developments and plan areas are shown here. for the year 2050, we took the transportation network assumptions from plan bay area 2040 and the project in that includes gary, bus rapid transit, central subway. downtown extension, more bart service through the san francisco core as well as express lanes on 101 and 280. through connect sf we will identify new concepts based on our needs to help us assess how we are doing. we identified metrics corr

phase two would be combined ground floor and pdr space as well as a childcare facility. collectively phase one would include office space and 11,054 speed of p.d.r. 5,540 of childcare facility and development of the public park and sidewalk and alley improvements. completion of phases one and two will result in approximately office and retail and p.d.r. space and institutional childcare space and two below grade parking garages and bicycle parking spaces. projects requesting approval of a large project pursuant to the code allow exception for unfide key sites within the central soma special use district but provide qualified amenities in excess of what is required by code. it includes dedication of a parcel for the mayor's office of housing and community develop for the future construction of affordable housing and dedication of langd -- land for the park in the center of the site. the project sponsor has agreed to construct and maintain the public park to help improve pedestrian >> they have a kid included it as a waiver to the executive report. the impact fee estimates

regards to -- also we had a motion of support for the allocation of a little over $4.6348 -- 4.6 million pdr in prop k sales funds. and also request for $100,000 prop a funds. these were specific to aversion planning along the great highway, as well as in regards to work done on ocean beast with the wastewater facility treatment plant area. some other key areas was also adoption of motion of support for the approval of the 2019 prop aa for recommendations. it was just over $4.1 million. this is item number 8. we had a unanimous approval of this. specifically, you know, looking to see if we could go ahead and actually chairman larson was hoping to split the prop a funds between the three programs. and that was, you know, replied as an affirmative, which which were really happy about. and also number 9 on your agenda, we had unanimously -- except for one abstention, unanimously approved a motion of support of the clean fund air program and projects, which is going to be item number 9 on your agenda as well today. we are very excited to continue to work in the efforts in that area. the one area