. >> commissioner pearlman. >> next wednesday there's an all day forum between the pummels and the port on the ports offices on sea. i'll report after but if anyone else is interested given the interest ton sequa in the last few months >> yesterday's chronicle had an article on the photographs which were taken during the construction of the bay bridge in 1935 and 1936. i'm familiar with the photographs their staerlg. if you go during the daytime i can go safely you can take bart >> the subcommittee met on june 27th and we'll be meeting on july 31st. >> thank you any other questions or comments from commissioner. seeing none, we'll close that item >> commissioners that will place you under items for continuance case 206 l at fillmore street consideration to spaekd the landmark dedication. any member of the public wish to speak on this item and a seeing none, i'll bring it to the commission phenomenon consideration of continuance >> i move to continue to august 21st. on that motion to continue (calling names) so move forward commissioners that passes 7 to zero and places you under your re

on that (calling names) so move forward commissioners that motion passes 6 to one with pearlman voting against >> commissioners your final item under our regular calendar is leveling case thirty 39 fourteen. >> if i might interrupt to thank the public for coming out and the legislative aids. thank you everybody >> the sustainable bill it an informational update. >> what's our time. >> wonderful got about 45 minutes and the presentation is 15. >> oh, yes commissioner. >> so i'd like to . >> this is a group task force. and as with any process we can't convey everything in the 15 minute presentation but we'll be happy to clarify. so here's the process. the planning department combaejz with the japan folks. we started with the neighborhood area plan that looked at the change that could be used in the neighborhood. as you may recall the plan so here we go four years later. what we did we kept the good better parts of the neighborhood plan. the community didn't like the proposed increases in the japan mall that would creativity an incentive to demolish the buildings. that being said there wa

. >> commissioner pearlman. >> i actually read the entire thing and it's an interesting concept and program. i had a couple of questions. one is this may be directed towards the department. i didn't know there was a specific one for public properties >> when the program was modified in 2003 to include the public properties in the c-3 district they set the 7.5. we actually - and, you know, >> i was wondering where you got the number from. >> it's an estimate that's something that legislation - you know, there needs to be a discussion on that. >> i assume the pier is the piece of property. how do i determine the boundary of a peer and how - what are the multipleers >> i think they're making a difference between - >> the building maybe bigger a than the property. >> thank you forrd that. i have another question. i said that the usual part of the san francisco program that a third party can buy the t drs is there a market, a broker why would they do that >> during the course of our interviews there's one broker who knows the area wherever you call people they have questions i call edward. i thi

. >> thank you commissioner pearlman. >> i want to address the unintended consequences. it seems to me this the the path the thirty day period passes and some place isn't aware of the project at that time, by it goes after a section 311 then it is dred and let's say dr is upheld and the project is modified. so, now again, i'm not understanding the difference between the substantial modification define that seems to apply that any change under the planning code. so if the project were changed it seems like and your office said no. there's no environmental impact of this changed but that potentially opens the door to file for an appeal. ; is that correct? >> just back to the beginning of our story. the thirty day period for exemption does not begin until the approval action. so even if the e

pearlman says the lawsuit is only business, nothing personal. >>> still ahead on the program, is your car a popular target for thieves? we have a list of the automobiles most likely to be stolen. >>> before we get to that, let's get a check on how stocks, bonds and commodities faired today. >>> the ford f-250 is a terrific vehicle for contract tomorrows and people towing boats and mobile homes but that's the problem. it is also now the new favorite among carp thieves specifically, it's the ford f-250 super duty crew cab with four-wheel drive the bad guys want. it has seven times the normal climbs compared to the average vehicle and the first time in ten years that the cadillac escalade was not in the top spot. apparently, my prius is safe. log on to our website nbr.com for the complete list. >>> we told you that foreclosures continue to drop and with housing prices recovering and confidence returning, the thought was that more renters would become buyers but mortgage rates closing in on 5% may turn that theory on it's head. diana olick has more. >> reporter: in cities across america,

adam pearlman who runs the integrated medicine program for the duke university health system. you think of this theory that some people get so conditioned to the adrenaline rush of stress and the release of the endorphines that you could get addicted to that. >> we're all familiar with the term adrenaline junkies and people that love that rush. it's interesting to think it may not be the rush, that sympathetic system, fight or flight, but maybe the more parasympathetic or the relaxed state and we could be addicted to it. >> do you really think that people thrive off stress for long periods of time? i always think maybe they thrive off of it in the short-term but they're damaged by it eventually. >> that's really the problem. i think it's important to understand the difference between acute stress which is a response that's very important. we wouldn't be able to survive about it. it happens to positive and negative things and gets us to move away from danger but there's also chronic stress where it's a different firespon and we see problems with with obesity, diabetes and heart