commissioner pearlman? >> the reason i had asked my question before about whether people were noticed or -- notified or not, and fortunately, commissioner johnck had my material, and my material, found my note, what outreach was done specifically to these property owners? you know, i'm really concerned about this -- i'm sorry, i can't remember your name, but you know, this person's concern that she just heard about this, and the other person who also said that she just heard about this, and that we're looking at, you know, a new historic district, which 'em ae particularly interested in only because i had my office at 25 lusk for many years. so i am familiar with the area, and it is remarkable that this little enclave has managed to survive all the development that's happened around there. when i was there, i was watching a lot of these buildings getting built and watching it getting denser and denser around there. i have some concerns about buildings that are being landmarked that, you know, the owner is n

commissioner pearlman. >> thank you. steve, maybe you could come up. i want to -- i mean -- i haven't been following this for seven years. barely seven days mostly seven hours. i

commissioner pearlman. >> thank you. steve, maybe you could come up. i want to -- i mean -- i haven't been following this for seven years. barely seven days mostly seven hours. i do want to congratulate you on a massive piece of work that is finally coming to some level of fruition. i did get a chance to read most of it in the last few days to get a feel for it. and it is really quite remarkable. i did want to ask about the changes that happened from, i think it was called the central corridor plan to the central soma plan. between, i guess it was 2013 then the end of 2016, there were some changes.

commissioner pearlman? >> yeah. i just want to thank the project sponsor for taking care of your building. it is also rare when the project sponsor is the owner and comes up specifically, so thank you for your presentation. i think this is a very easy one to approve. i think it does satisfy all of the requirements, and i would endorse approving this. >> great. >> i second the motion. >> okay. so is that a motion, commissioner pearlman? >> that's a motion. >> great. >> very good, then, commissioners. if there's nothing further, there is a motion that has been seconded to approve the certificate of appropriateness. on that motion. [ roll call. ] >> thank you, commissioners. that motion passes unanimously, 5-0. acting zoning administrator would say. >> i'll close the public hearing and intent to grant with the standard conditions. >> thank you. commissioners, that'll place us on item eight for case number 2018-2034 lbr for 1750 gary boulevard. this is a legacy business application. >> hello, commissioners. shelley calc

commissioner pearlman, is that a new comment? >> yeah, it is. so this is all under one agenda item. >> no, they're separate agenda items. we can take them separately -- >> dhas he what i was going to ask. can we vote on these separately? >> you certainly can. >> you certainly can. >> because typically, we would not bundle so many into one item. >> yes, we can certainly take them up separately. if there aren't other comments, i would like to say i actually disagree with commissioner pearlman about the three individual landmarks. i think they are worthy of landmark designation, and i think i've always been a great admirer of the hotel utah. there aren't ones that are so exceptional in this location that have the history of this hotel. i think it is worthy. i think the new pullman history was fascinating, and i think it's also worthy of just the pile driver. i think they're worthy of designation, and i also believe that this is a great addition -- this won't actually be a new landmark district, though, the clyde will just be an extension of the sou

stuart: i've got to tell you that ashley and i were just blown away by pearlman. the right, the company that i was looking at the company you were looking at the man got it dead right now can we get neil cavuto up on the screen please? is he there yes he is. put neil full on, please. neil? you're going to work and he's going to read your mind. >> rapid fire where are you neil neil: in my studio. >> we are numbers folks here think of a number between 1-100 right now. neil: i am. >> i want you to change your mind at this moment change to a different number. neil: okay. >> nobody likes to go smaller, let's go with this. can i hand you the pen stuart? stuart: yes. >> i'll have you lean over so tell us what were you thinking about what was the number? neil: the latest one? >> whatever is in your mind right now. neil: 4. tell him what i wrote down please? stuart: 4. >> it's true. reverse psychology you went bigger and back down to 4 neil i'm inside your head. neil: no, i started out with 2. i'm kidding. i don't know what i did. i heard that stuart was going to have you