staff hospital said there was no chemical attack, robert fisk said there's no chemical attack, pearson sharpnt there and they said there was no chemical attack. everybody‘s saying there was no chemical attack, but you choose to believe white helmets who are al-qaeda civil arm. i don't know why. there are so many inconsistencies in what you're saying, i can't unpick them all. but if you're going to cite western journalists as misleading, then don't cite one western journalist who happens to suit your opinion and tell me that's proof. the proof is going to be found, if there is, indeed, any conclusive proof by the 0pcw who haven't even written their report yet. so you can't possibly tell me that you know what happened in douma. 0k, excellent. excellent. no, actually, i can tell you what happened just two months ago in the same facilities, and i'm waiting for the 0pcw report and i can tell you what happened in eastern aleppo, because we don't have chemical weapons, and how can we use chemical weapons on the population we're trying to liberate, one, when our troops are in close proximity, two, d