but let's start anew, because this gentleman, who i deeply do not respect, through the pechersk district court of kyivit is the pechersk district court of kyiv, satisfied his lawsuit against you, against the movement honestly, because you keep such a register of state traitors, this register i will tell our viewers immediately doesn't have any legal effect, it's more about the reputational consequences, yes, but if portnow decides to sue to be removed from the registry, which doesn't even have any legal consequences, it's an indication that he's trying to cover information trails and maybe someday he 's going to to even return to ukraine and build a political career here, ms. vito, actually, what will be the reaction of the honest movement to... what audacity on the part of portnov? the movement is honestly already preparing an appeal, that is, we will disagree with such a court decision and will leave further, we will go to the appeal. i will say right away that portnov appeals not only to the honest movement, you correctly noted that the honest register is a kind of database, it is such an aggregato

qualification commission of judges evaluated all the explanations of the judge of the pechersk district court of kyivedy, and found them unconvincing. so the judge is waiting for dismissal. today i have everything. you watched judicial control. i am tatyana shostrova. tell us about the facts of corruption in the judicial system that you know. write to the e-mail which. see on the screen or me on facebook. see you in exactly a week. come closer victory together with tssoa asbu. join one of the best special forces in the country. we are expanding and hiring. we invite civilian specialists of various fields. experienced commanders will ensure your high-quality training and education. fill out the questionnaire and choose the direction where you can be most effective. we are waiting for you in the team of tssoa asbu. together we will write the history of victory. details on the official pages of the sbu. it seemed to me that the americans, as well as the ukrainians, were shocked and surprised by the operation in the kursk region. i could be wrong, of course this operation changed the attitude of the stat

judge in zaporizhzhia in 2012, and already in february 14, she was transferred to the pechersk district court of kyiver a simplified procedure. at the time of the transfer , she did not consider a single case, which calls into question her professional training, and in the opinion of the public council, it is good. raises suspicions about using connections to obtain preferences. my career was consistent, logical, and i don't see any, you know, doubts in this that i immediately got to know the court team, i was not separated from justice, that is, i explained that i was and as an assistant and constantly studied and, well, that is, put in the maximum effort from myself, which is in principle. well , if from my point of view i confirm that, well, in terms of my professional integrity of those characteristics, that's why i was ready, in 2015 the judge wednesday changed the preventive measure from house arrest for tavakul ragimov, who led the so-called aunties in kyiv during the kidnappings, beatings and torture of maidan activists, the suspect escaped, then this decision caused a great public outcry, as

this is kateryna sereda, the judge of the pechersk district court of the city of kyiv.ain, let's call them healthy ambitions in terms of my further career growth. kateryna sereda was appointed to the position of judge in in 2012, already in february 14, she was transferred to pechersk district court of kyiv under a simplified procedure. at the time of the transfer, she did not handle any case, which calls into question her professional training and, according to the public integrity council, raises suspicions about the use of connections to obtain preferences. my career was consistent, logical, and i don't see any, you know, doubts about it, that i immediately got acquainted with. that is, i explained that i was also an assistant and that i was constantly studying and, well, that is, i was putting in my maximum effort, which in principle, well, if i, from my point of view sight, i confirm that, in terms of my professional integrity, those characteristics, so i was ready, in 2015, the judge wednesday changed the pretrial detention. the course of detention to house arrest

this is kateryna sereda, the judge of the pechersk district court of the city of kyiv.rtain, let's call them healthy ambitions in terms of my further career growth. kateryna sereda was appointed to the post of judge in zaporizhzhia in 2012, and already in february 14, she was transferred to pecherzh. district court of kyiv under a simplified procedure. at the time of transfer, she did not consider any case. this calls into question her professional training and, in the opinion of the public integrity council, raises suspicions about the use of connections to obtain preferences. my career was consistent, logical, and i don't see any, you know, doubts about it, that i immediately got to know the court team, i was not separated, but from justice, that is, i... i already explained that i was an assistant, and i constantly studied, and, well, that is, i put in my best efforts, which in principle, well, from my point of view sight, i confirm that in terms of my professional integrity, those characteristics, that is why i was ready, in 2015 the judge wednesday changed the prev

mention, again, about the people's deputy dmytrouk, artem dmytrouk, in particular, the pechersk district court of kyiv granted the request of the prosecutor general and elected dmytro. preventive measure in the form of detention without custody without setting bail, but i want to remind you that this happened only after dmytruk crossed the border, he crossed the border with unrecognized transnistria and, as far as i understand, the odesa region, and fled , today according to some media he was seen in london, i don't know if it's true or not, but you probably also saw these photos and videos. questions about the effectiveness and timeliness of the law enforcement system, and questions about why people like dmytruk, who for years spread russian narratives, for years defended russian institutions in ukraine, the russian church in ukraine, who undermined the essentially legal order, who undermined mobilization, who spoke absolutely anti-ukraine. things poured mud on ukrainian values, why do these people find themselves abroad and only after that receive certain official charges already from law enforcemen

pechersk... the kyiv district court granted the request of the prosecutor general and chose dmytruk as a preventive measure in the form of detention in custody without bail, but i want to remind you that this happened only after dmytruk crossed the border, crossed the border he is with the unrecognized transnistria and, as far as i understand, the odesa region, and fled, today , according to some media, he was seen in london. true, false, but you've probably seen these photos and videos too. question to effectiveness and timeliness of the law enforcement system, and the question of why people like dmytruk, who for years spread russian narratives, for years defended russian institutions in ukraine, the russian church in ukraine, who undermined the essentially legal order, who... undermined mobilization, who said absolutely anti-ukrainian things, smeared ukrainian values, why do these people find themselves abroad and only after that receive some official accusations already from law enforcement agencies, this is the key question, which today we also do not we have answers, and this is the key questi