from the resolution of the pechersk district court of kyiv. he discussion of the rental price of the apartment and approval of the rent offer in the amount of one thousand hryvnias, despite the private property interest, knyazov was obliged to immediately take such measures, to refuse the offer, to attract witnesses, if possible, to inform in writing about the offer of the direct supervisor. in the presence or head of specially authorized subjects in the field anti-corruption. instead, knyazov accepted an offer to rent housing for 100 hryvnias per month and systematically used the gift he received. in this way, over the years of renting the princes , he saved almost 1 million hryvnias. the court prosecuted him for this administrative offense and imposed a fine of uah 2,500. information about non-compliance with anti-corruption legislation was also forwarded to the verkhovna rada. justice, and instead of strengthening the corrupt history of the prince with a bribe, the vrp actually undertook to consider only a misdemeanor with rent an apartment.

from the resolution of the pechersk district court of kyiv. ring discussion of the rental price of housing and approval of a rent offer in the amount of 1.00 hryvnias, despite a private property interest, was obliged to immediately take such measures, refuse the offer, attract witnesses, if it is... head of specially authorized entities in the field of anti -corruption. instead, knyazum accepted an offer to rent housing for 100 hryvnias per month and systematically used the gift he received. thus, during the years of lease of the princes saved almost uah 1 million. the court prosecuted him for this administrative offense and imposed a fine of uah 2,500. information about... non-compliance with anti-corruption legislation was also transferred to the supreme council of justice, and instead of strengthening the corrupt history of the prince with a bribe, the vrp actually undertook to consider only the misdemeanor of renting an apartment. council member serhiy burlakov dragged out the consideration of the bribery complaint in the supreme court so m

court and his landlord were not close relatives, so accepting a gift in the form of such a significant discount on housing, knyazyu had no right. from the resolution of the pechersk district court of kyivs during the discussion of the rental price and agreement rental offers in the amount of uah 1,000, despite private property. the interested party was obliged to immediately take such measures, refuse the proposal, attract witnesses, if possible, notify in writing about the proposal of the immediate manager, if available, or the manager of specially authorized entities in the field of anti -corruption. instead, knyazum accepted an offer to rent housing for 100 hryvnias per month and systematically used the gift he received. in this way, over the years of renting the princes , he saved almost 1 million hryvnias. for this administrative law. violation, the court brought him to justice and imposed a fine of uah 2,500. information about non-compliance with anti-corruption legislation was also passed on to the supreme council of justice, and instead of strengthening the prince's corruption history with a bribe, the vrp actually undertook to consider only the misdemeanor of renting an apartm

the investigative judge of the pechersk district court of kyiv issued a decision to seize all movable immovable property as part of the investigation by the national police of ukraine. in addition , funds in bank accounts were seized. the company believes that such a decision is illegal. however, these... funds were neither determined by material evidence in the case, nor procedurally and physically cannot be material evidence in this case, there is no ruling on the recognition of material evidence, but for some reason the court of appeal of the appellate instance in general did not pay attention to it, i also want to draw attention to the fact that we focused on unlocking a number of necessary company accounts. in july 2024 in kyiv appeals. court held a hearing regarding this arrest, the panel of judges refused to satisfy the appeal of the company's representatives. unfortunately, we could not. to actually achieve and receive the proper administration of justice, even in the presence of all indisputable evidence regarding the unreasonableness and illegality of the imposition of the s

from the resolution of the pechersk district court of kyiv. the discussion of the rental price of housing and the approval of the rental offer in the amount of 1,000 hryvnias, despite the private property interest, was obliged to immediately take such measures, to refuse.

at this stage, the only way to cancel the specified arrests is to apply to the pechersk district court of the city of kyiv with a request to cancel the specified arrest. it is currently under consideration in the pechersk court there are about three petitions. at the enterprise itself, it is noted that such pressure on production can lead to the shutdown of the plant, which in turn will stop the payment of customs payments, services of state enterprises, and domestic assistance. to displaced persons, as well as the receipt of foreign exchange revenue to the ukrainian economy. good morning, welcome to our air, welcome to everyone who joins the air of the espresso tv channel in order to start this with us. another day, friday today in ukraine. andriy saichuk, voliana panasyuk, i am with you today to tell you about the most important things that are happening in ukraine. the air alert continues, residents of kyiv, cherkasy and kirovohrad regions should stay in shelters, as well as in sumy, kharkiv and, traditionally, luhansk regions. the air alert also continues, in addition, explosions were heard in the dni

cancel the specified arrests is there is an appeal to the corresponding pechersk district court of the city of kyivh a request to cancel the specified arrest. currently , about three petitions are pending in the pechersk court. at the enterprise itself, it is noted that such pressure on production can lead to a stoppage of the plant's work, which in turn will stop the payment of customs payments, services of state enterprises, assistance to internally displaced persons, as well as the receipt of foreign exchange. pen to the ukrainian economy, well, well, we continue our telethon, now to us the political scientist of levus international metro will join in, mr. dmytro, congratulations, congratulations, glory to ukraine, glory to the heroes, glory to the heroes, let's talk a little about the international situation, yesterday we already... raised this topic, we found out, now we know who will be , who will be kamala harris' right-hand man in the event that she becomes the next president of the united states, and this is tim walls, this is the governor, the senator from minnesota, the democrats, what c

only one way to cancel the specified arrests, this is an appeal to the relevant pechersk district court of the city of kyivh a request to cancel the specified arrest. currently , about three petitions are pending in the pechersk court. the company itself notes that such pressure on production can lead to the shutdown of the plant, which in turn will stop the payment of customs payments, services of state enterprises, assistance to internally displaced persons, as well as the inflow of foreign exchange earnings to the ukrainian economy. dear friends, we return, the next hour of our marathon, we begin it. and lesya vakulyuk, andriy saichuk, i would like to remind you that today we are working for you throughout the day, not only in the morning, and i also want to remind you that the collection is ongoing, important and necessary, and we hope you will support it, we have already with you, we crossed the mark of 7,000 uah, we already have 71,000 uah, 748, 500 uah were collected this morning, but don't stop, i'm thinking whether we will be able to reach the mark in these two days, saturday and sunday in 800 00

only way to cancel the specified arrests is to appeal to the defendant. of the pechersk district court of the city of kyivh a request to cancel the specified arrest. currently , about three petitions are pending in the pechersk court. the company itself notes that such pressure on production can lead to the shutdown of the plant, which in turn will stop the payment of customs payments, services of state enterprises, assistance to internally displaced persons, as well as the inflow of foreign exchange earnings to the ukrainian economy. announcements, dear friends, and this is our final hour on the air on the espresso tv channel. thank you for being with us, and we with you, marta oliyarnyk, lesya vakulyuk and oleg kadko, a military expert and editor-in-chief are already joining us defense express. mr. oleg, we welcome you. good day, thank you for the invitation. and we want to start with some good news. good news from lipetsk. airfield, it was very loud and very bright there tonight, we know that the general staff has already confirmed this information to us, that our military, defense forces, sbu and othe

evaluation qualifications ukrainian judges, including representatives. of the odious oask and pechersk district court of kyivording to the anti-corruption center, certain dubious members of the supreme council of justice and the vkk may try to interpret the supreme court's decision in such a way as to not only help the unscrupulous servants of themis, but also undermine future evaluation procedures. it is very important , in fact, that these two institutions continue the qualification assessment in the same order as it was before, and the decision in the case of the judge. that was considered individual there a decision, specifically in this case, which should not be applied to absolutely all cases, but it is already clear that in these institutions there are also members who believe that this decision should be applied to the rest of the judges, so there will be a kind of struggle here, and what will be the result and what will be the consequence, actually at the moment it is difficult to predict. the precedent set by the grand chamber regarding a drastic and groundless change in its own practice indicates

pass the evaluation qualifications, including representatives of the odious oask and pechersk district courts of kyiving to the anti-corruption center, certain dubious members of the supreme council of justice and the vkk may try to interpret the decision of the supreme court in such a way as to not only help unscrupulous officials of themis. but also to undermine future evaluation procedures. it is very important indeed that these two institutions continue the assessment is qualified in the same order as it was before, and the decision in the case of judge usatovoy was considered an individual decision, specifically in this case, which should not be applied absolutely to all cases. but, well, it is already clear that these institutions also have members. who believe that this decision should be applied to the rest of the judges, so there will be a kind of struggle here, and what will be the result and what will be the consequence, in fact, it is difficult to predict at the moment, the precedent that the grand chamber has created for a sharp and groundless change in its own practice shows that there

pass the evaluation qualifications, including representatives of the odious oask and pechersk district courts of kyivccording to the anti-corruption center, certain questionable members of the supreme council of justice and the supreme court of justice may try to interpret the decisions of the supreme court yes, in order not only to help the unscrupulous servants of themis, but also to undermine the future procedures of the evaluation quals. it is very important , in fact, that these two institutions continue the qualification assessment in the same order as it was before, and that the decision in the case of judge usatovoy be considered an individual decision, specifically in this case, which should not be applied to absolutely all cases, but come on it is clear that there are also members in these institutions who believe that this is the solution. but apply to the rest of the judges, so here there will be a kind of struggle, and what will be the result and what will be the consequence, in fact, it is difficult to predict at the moment, the precedent set by the grand chamber in terms of a drastic a

of global corruption , a completely different, much smaller and actually artificial case was initiated in the supreme court. in december 2023. acts of corruption were reported to the pechersk district court of kyivead, knyazum accepted an offer to rent housing for uah 1.00 per month and systematically used the received gift. thus, during the years of lease of the princes saved almost uah 1 million. the court prosecuted him for this administrative offense and imposed a fine of uah 2,500. information about non-compliance with anti-corruption legislation was also transferred to the supreme council of justice and instead. in order to reinforce the corrupt history of the prince with a bribe, the vrp actually undertook to consider only the misdemeanor of renting an apartment. council member serhiy burlakov dragged out the consideration of the bribery complaint in the supreme court so much that knyazum was eventually released only on the grounds of low rent. i'm sorry, the circular bailout has already had enough, it has been going on for years, decades, and citizens are suffering, ukraine is suffering. the supreme council of justice never managed to establish justice. at the same time , the case about

investigating the facts of global corruption in the supreme court, a completely different, much smaller and actually artificial case was initiated. in december 2023 , the pechersk district court of kyivved materials from nazk about bringing the prince to administrative responsibility. for rent of an apartment with an area of ​​133 m2 at a price lower than the minimum market value, namely for 100 hryvnias per month. such prices really cannot be found even on the outskirts of the capital, not that in the very heart of kyiv, the government quarter, where the princes lived since 2017. at the same time, the ex-head of the supreme court and his landlord were not close relatives, so he had no right to accept a gift in the form of such a significant discount on the princes' housing. from the resolution. chersky district court of kyiv. princes during the discussion of the rental price of housing and approval of the rent offer in the amount of uah 1, despite the private property interest, was is obliged to immediately take such measures, refuse the proposal, attract witnesses, if possible, notify in writing about the proposal of the immediate supervisor, if available, or the supervisor of spec