pelham on the budget write-up. it was astounding to read and the astounding part was not what would be done. not just what you have on the books, the 67 complaints, but all that would not be done without getting more ftes. i would say that you hear a certain segment of the public at every one of your meetings, but the larger public, in a remember correctly, 75% voted very strongly for some good ethics reform for prop c. so i would suggest that maybe you think about having the commissioners, maybe the chair do an editorial and talk about what is in front of the budget? what we're asking for? what is important? and how hampered we have been? and it may be helpful to get some comments back to the supervisors about what they should be voting on? so that is one comment. the other comment real quickly is don't forget over the time period when we have been talking about how you don't have enough auditors and stuff, i believe the controller's office has offered some of their services for auditors to help you out on the aud