and also as is the peloton from the language the serbian lost ahead of patrick on a run of it six four six two this was the satsumas was it finished the other hand. and that was the only surprise result of this safeguard just disappears only in austin three sets to so hot they are from israel although the world number one power lies as nancy history to the quarterfinals of russia passes by to minsk because russian obviously one of the. founders finish with one of the newest and most exciting extreme sports cliff diving in competitive terms it's just over ten years old and there's one russian who's already astonished his name in the sport. an experienced. land. bridge taking this he's guiding the route stream where he'll be and nature to become one. it's one of the newest force in the planet as it became keep a. close ally in the air condition which usually do enter the years jane and rochelle with a physically diver could be proud of and james you can get you a six year early days of his first victory they would need series in a displaced year and entered the season as the favorite alo

on capitol hill this morning, homeland security official secretary, janet of peloton know, will testify. also, this afternoon at 4:00 eastern, the mexican president calderon felipe >> in a few moments, this morning's headlines and your calls live on "washington journal." and the house of representatives in -- is in session at 10:00 eastern for more debate on a bill designed to reduce the amount of paperwork required of small businesses. small businesses.

i think what we are hearing today is we can focus on this for the rest of peloton is the ball of this rule as binding or are we moving towards a place where policy recommendations or directives could be just as effective in determining the rules of the game that apply to all operators legal advisers, operators on the ground where the operations are being conducted? do we want to be more clear about that, or are we moving between law and politics? a question that i think neil is raising is the will of law -- rule of law do we have to clarify the legal standards it is applying when engaged in conflict and military operations? is there something that tells the world what standards are being applied? should it? is the model being increasingly placed on those engaging in international law on a daily basis? some are observing and monetary -- monitoring compliance. i want to reflect on a question that has come up but i want to see from members of the audience are there aspects of ambiguity or a lack of clarity and transparency that are advantageous to the state? we have the position that it

secretary-general of peloton know, michael chertoff, and tom ridge. -- secretary general janet the llatenomichael chertoff, and tom ridge. particular i am grateful to walter isaacson, president ceo of the aspen institute. i am thankful for his friendship and collaboration that brings us here today. as well as colleagues from the department of homeland security. we express our appreciation for their support in organizing our program in the students of georgetown university lecture fund to help support the staff host the event. finally, i would like to welcome ndrea mitchell, the moderator of this even today. this event gives us an opportunity to reflect on the changes in our world since september 11, 2001, and the ways in which the united states government has responded to these changes. later this year we will observe the 10th anniversary of the attacks. in response, the homeland security agency was created. the creation of the department united 22 agencies from across the executive branch, making it the largest reorganization since harry truman consolidated the armed forces into the depar

the current secretary will be there janet of peloton of. -- napalitano. >> people ask if i miss being secretary. in a certain respect, i say yes. in a couple of years, -- i