this is a pendulum. there's a pendulum -- all of the works in the interior are loosely based on the systems of modeling information. of modeling i think be beyond our capacity to ever understand and the humility and it's a wonder with what are one has. but they become a classic model like a pendulum, so all of the sculptures are based on the idea that has an attempt to function. this idea of behavior that i brought up. this idea of when you go to the room you hopefully are witnessing almost behavior or the desire to understand information rather than a physical object or sculpture so this is the planetarium and peace. >> the notion of the compass and how we locate ourselves in a perpetually disoriented -- >> exactly. so i take the idea of a compass. it gets repeated in three rooms and above this compass in three rooms is a sculpture that we see based on the idea of a plantar i didn't mean and the numbering of which room you come to first and last, for me it was an incredible opportunity as curators have

of the production; over the next fiscal year will hire two classes which we are grateful for, the pendulum is swinging in the resurrection to increase our staffing. we will have our projections and we will have it laid out for you; we send out an e-mail the other day. we will have a net increase of approximately 29 ftes, that is why we are concerned about the level of reduction that the budget is proposing at this time. >> supervisor farrell: if this sounds right there is a dispute of 359-- includes 15,000 dollars for encumbrances-- >> -- maybe you could be precise and we could respond. >> i'm having to run through starting with the first recommendation related to stationary engineer, where there was a position and the budget analyst recommended a reduction of -- we would agree a total savings proposed 33,864. we also believe that position has already been accounted for in terms of attrition. so our numbers would not be the 112.914, rather 33,894 and we provide to technicians to the budget analyst and your office. >> can we take one at a timemr. chairman? >> i want to discuss the first ite

a lot of chatter about the pendulum. going back from being 24-7 connected all of the time. and wanting. so people wanting some time to unplug and disconnect. there is all of the applicationes to go on. digital detox to collect a phone at the door. or there is a hotel in dc that will lock your phone up and you can check in [laughter] >> and people are responding to this? >> people want that. they are paying for that. so people are really seeing and recognizing that we are almost tech addicted and obsessed in the culture. that we will need to reclaim a little bit of our life back. that also drew me the write a children's picture book. they are not just adults that are tech obsessed. my own 2-year-old son would walk up to a picture frame and swipe it and ask for elmo barney. so we have lived in the culture. our toddlers are tech obsess and i wanted to write a children's picture book on the same topic of finding the tech-life balance and remembering there is a beautiful world out there too for our kids into when it comes to the children's book how to you approach it. >> it has

pendulums were once the cutting edge or time. now the world has relied on atomic clocks.t is what is known as a fountain clock. it emits atoms and the cascade down. the data is captured and time is found from that recording. accuracyk has gotten of about a second in 100 million years. >> it isn't bad, really. there is always room for improvement. the current definition of a manyd is the duration of oscillations of the radiation absorbed or emitted when it added jumps between two energy spaces. but that could change. suggestss because test these clocks could be three times as accurate as current atomic clocks. clock is not just a single clock with a single atom. it is a collection of clocks working together and using laser beams by giving higher frequency. the higher frequency is a better chance you have of getting an accurate measure of a second. >> many people are quite happy with their own definition. >> what is a second? 60 seconds of a minute. it has to do with atomic clock. one beep means that a second has passed. the accuracyists is not a waste of time -- scientists

if the pendulum gets pushed too far one day they get up and they shove it back where it belongs.one that. now is it possible there is a tipping point the pendulum gets shoved too far one way and you can't get it back? i suppose there is a tin plate pagen have we reached it? i doubt it. i think -- i have enormous confidence in the american people. think of all the people that rushed into the world trade center and new york. the people when it was attacked. think of the people that question to the pentagon and started pushing people out that were burned in the dining and injured and frightened. the american people have a lot. these streets were not paved with gold and the people that came from other countries and that built it into what it is. i have a web site, rumsfeld.com. i put a speech by adamle stevenson that was given to my class in college in 1954. and if you have got young people that are wondering about the world, read that speech by adamle stevenson. he had to have any democrat. i don't think that he would have been a terribly good president to be honest with you. he was

>> the idea of vertical integration as a pendulum that swings back and forth.time warner cable was part of time warner corporation and they unwound their vertical integration just about five years ago. cablevision did the same and in the form assets of amc. comcast would and the other direction and vertically integrated. of the the balance industry has moved away from vertical integration than toward it. there are some regulatory complexities that go along with being the vertically integrated. warner operates under decrees that last for five years. clear righttirely now what that vertical integration and get them. a few years from now when those obligations are gone, and maybe we start to see more innovative ways to put that vertical integration to work. right now, people are in the way to seek mode. >> are the charters, the bright , ready for a wireless world? are we ready for wellness world? >> it depends on what you mean. there's a lot fuzziness about this term wireless. when you're using your ipad, something like 80% of the time, you are probably using it v

watch the pendulum has swung. we may be at a point now where there is a little

of the production; over the next fiscal year will hire two classes which we are grateful for, the pendulum is swinging in the resurrection to increase our staffing. we will have our projections and we will have it laid out for you; we send out an e-mail the other day. we will have a net increase of approximately 29 ftes, that is why we are concerned about the level of reduction that the budget is proposing at this time. >> supervisor farrell: if this sounds right there is a dispute of 359-- includes

yes, the pendulum has to swing in either direction, i would much prefer to see it swing in the direction of human rights. all right. behind the headlines: human trafficking is a $32 billion per year industry. around the globe, millions of young women and men are forced into prostitution and slave labor every year. but there are heroines working to combat the problem. step one: create more awareness. >> many people thought that this is someone else's problem. until they started to understand that often runaway children particularly little girls can easily be seduced and convinced that they're going to be a model, are going to be a dancer and they end up not ever seeing the light of day again. >> marilyn carlson nelson of the global travel and hospitality company, carlson companies, is a leader in the fight against human trafficking. so is homeland security secretary janet napolitano. ending sex trafficking is part of her job, as is making the american public more aware of human trafficking. >> there's no community in the united states that is immune to this, it is an international plague,

watch the pendulum has swung. we may be at a point now where there is a little correcting after 9/11. going into election year, what are the politics? >> this was a real demonstration. you had house republican and democratic leadership on the same side of the issue with the white house. then you had so many members voting to restrict this program. i think the fact that you solve the head of the house and senate intelligence committee consent publicly to examining how to possibly bring this and are put in more privacy protections as an example of what they are willing to do as a first step and if they can do that that they can get agreement on it and put that in place and maybe that will be enough to hold it off. it depends on what transpires and whether it continues to down political discourse. a lot depends on how quickly edward snowden situation where there in russia or back in the united states is settled. >> thank you for your questions. we appreciate it.

the idea of vertical integration has been a pendulum that swings back and forth. remember, this time warner cable was part of time warner corporation, and they just unwound their digital, their vertical integration just about five years ago. cablevision did the same thing and spun off its content assets in the form of amc, and they've become a pure play. comcast went in the other direction and vertically integrated. i still think the balance of the industry has moved more away from vertical integration than toward it. now, there are some regulatory complexities that go along with being vertically integrated. comcast operates under consent decree obligations that last for five years post the 2009 or 2010 closing of the deal. and so it's not entirely clear that right now what that vertical integration can get them. a few years from now when their, when those obligations sunset, it may be that we start to see some more innovative ways to put that vertical integration to work, but right now i think most people are in the wait and see mode. >> host: mr. moffett, are th

that period when the pendulum trying to swing back and forth between afghanistan and the outer world started to swing so fast and so far it finally clashed a and the country succumbed to a coup by the small, this group that was quickly followed by the soviet invasion i would content from that day to is is we're still in the aftermath of the effects of the soviet invasion that pretty much destroyed the fabric of the country. the 6 million refugees the destruction of the villages, tearing apart of the tribal structure and the creation of this stage of war in which the old traditional afghan system for generating leadership gave way to a new system in that state of chaos if you had a gun and were good you would be important. that is aholt other class of that commuters who are commanders now called warlords and that it entered the fray when the soviets left they started to fight each other to tear the city's apart then came the taliban now we are in the country and i think we have come in with the same idea of the soviets this is a primitive country and a lot of trouble if we can restore

the pendulum swung and the cloud/social/mobile universe came back in favor. take advantage of the weakness in google, and buy some of the tech titan. i still like facebook, which is yes, my biggest position in my charitable trust and boy, did i feel relief. you can follow along where we have been saying that this is the real deal and suddenly, we are not alone. oh, and why not circle back to the company that pioneered the holy trinity, salesforce.com. they have terrific long-term theme and they have spent enough time in the wilderness. how about the biotechs? they have been resting of late. they have been snoozing, catching some zs. and you know it's my most beloved of groups in 2013. just reported great numbers, and the group explodes higher with new money. i say -- you have to remember, there's a ton of drugs in the pipeline that are going to be approved soon. gilead, that stock, after the bell, it's got the best product pipeline of all. it's probably up about, let's say, $14 in a couple weeks. that is astonishing. $92 billion market cap and do not count ou

where are we in the pendulum swing?wing back to free markets and the private sector? >> seeing overregulation, government centralization. you're seeing more ideas tipping toward milton friedman. in the last three years you've had five statewide voucher programs. you're starting to see this idea of his about giving parents the freedom to choose the best school for their children be widely accepted. you have 23 states that have 44 programs over 250,000 children getting vouchers and over 600,000 families using tax credit. on one hand you have a centralization, you're seeing this growth, on the other hand you're seeing educational freedom. that's great for us in the long run. >> we all agree, both sides agree on education. it's the way -- once again, good intentions. thank you and congrats. we love milton friedman. anyway, thank you. >> thanks for having me. great birthday today. >>> this is "squawk box." we'll be right back. if you're serious about taking your trading to a higher level, tdd#: 1-800-345-2550 then schwab is

look, the -- what most people don't understand is in the last 20, 30 years, there's been a swig, a pendulum swing in the types of people that get appointed to be judge and the overwhelming majority or ex prosecutors, so they come to the bench with that perspective. having said that, there is something, i think, endearing about this brisk style. i think she's a great judge in the sense that she takes no non-sense. she keeps everybody on board. the only thing i would ask about her and what i think i really like about her, is she's an equal opportunity person. she gets -- she gets in the prosecution's face. she gets in the defense's face. that's all i ever ask. now i know she's got issues with don west and i don't know if there is a history there. maybe somebody else can tell me. a lot of times i just respect a judge. i don't mind if they get into my face, as long as they do it the same time with the prosecution, and i think she's handled this case as well as anybody could have. >> does it ever pay to argue with the judge? >> sometimes, yeah, most judges will listen to you and some of these le

that ended when the pendulum of trying to swing back and forth between inner afghanistan and the other world started to swing so fast and so far that it finally crashed. the country succumbed to a coup by the small communist group which is then quickly was followed by the soviet invasion. we are still in the aftermath of the after effects of the soviet invasion. the soviet invasion pretty much destroyed the fabric of the country. you know, the 6 million refugees that it drove the country, the destruction of the villages, the tearing apart of the tribal structures, and the creation of a state of war in which, you know, the old, traditional afghan systems for generating leaders gave way to a new system which was invested of chaos if you have a gun in your go with it you were probably going to end up being an important guide. so that brought into being a whole other class of afghan leaders who are commanders. now they call them warlords. and that entered the fray. when the soviets left, those guys all started fighting each other and tore cities apart. and then in the wake of that. now we

so when you're on rope you never want a pendulum and swing them because your rope could cut. >> the ladders, the windows too distant. firefighters are left with one final option. the roof. >> we had a rappelling rack up top that they were using, it's basically a bunch of bars that we weave the rope through. it acts as a frictional device. and once that was all done, which took about 30 minutes, we had placed the firefighter juro into the harness and we lowered him off the side of the building. >> juro carefully descends and reaches the two men clinging to the platform. he determines the worker on the top end can hang on for a little while longer but the other one gives him cause for concern. >> the first victim was actually standing on the scaffolding. he was holding on pretty tight to the building, but he seemed okay. he wasn't like super panicked yet. the guy below him seemed more in a panicked state. i think one of the reasons was that his harness was right around his legs where it should have been, but his whole weight was suspended by that harness which was starting to cut off the bloo

government that basically turned a blind eye to this thing to $10 billion, it's quite a swing of a pendulumi keep say ng this interview that i think is going to have a positive ripple effect. i'm not going to say whether it ought to be this or that amount of money. the only thing i've said over the past ten years in regard to a lot of these fines is that they're able to write them off to the cost of doing business. you have a billion dollar fine, you're probably only talking about $650 million. i think we have to deal with it in congress. should this be a cost of doing business? because some of these big firms, regardless of talking about hundreds of millions it might not be enough it might not be enough if it's just the cost of doing business. to do wrong doing and then pay for it. >> senator, speaking of congress, what are the next steps for congress? will we see hearings at this point hedge fund managers including steve cohen will have to answer to members of congress like you? >> well i'm on the judiciary committee and that's where we have it as far as the justice department is concerne

you'll see like everything in our society the pendulum has swing to overregulation of assets and you'll see it cutting back the other way. >> as it often does. >> right. the democrats are going to be up against it in the near term with the congressional elections next year and i think you're going to see a tapering of this regulation. >> a comment from the treasure secretary. i'm sure mr. lew is going to be asked about this. delivering alpha.com, if you have anymore questions about that. before we head to break let's check on after hours movers. how about open table. it's falling today 4% on city initiating coverage of the stock with a sell rating but it's a different tune for google. that stock is up slightly in extended trading. recently getting back above 900 bucks. that analyst right there, mark may, he has initiated coverage on many names. he's coming up on this show. tesla says hello to the s&p 500 while big blue gets a black eye courtesy of goldman. a few of our top trades today. stick around. we're back in two. trust your instincts to make the call. to treat my low testosterone

what's more interesting is how with that kind of split, half and half, you have to wonder how the pendulumually swung towards the not guilty verdict, how they were able to convince the other three to capitulate. remember, one, at least one was for the highest degree, the second-degree murder, and two for manslaughter. so in that way at least if not a majority then a plurality at least were for not guilty while the other 2-3 was sort of split on its own. i was surprised, but i would be really interested to see how each ballot went as time went on. >> yeah. it looks like the three who initially thought not guilty were very convincing during the course of those, what, 16 hours or so of deliberations and brought the other three to their point of view. mike, in the scott peterson trial, you guys took seven days. was there a similar split at the beginning? and how decisions were changed, votes were changed over the course of those seven days? >> well, yes, wolf. the more you get into discussing the evidence and testimony and debating the value of that and credibility and what have you, things wi

look, the -- what most people don't understand is in the last 20, 30 years, there's been a swig, a pendulumple that get appointed to be judge and the overwhelming majority or ex prosecutors, so they come to the bench with that perspective. having said that, there is something, i think, endearing about this brisk style. i think she's a great judge in the sense that she takes no non-sense. she keeps everybody on board. the only thing i would ask about her and what i think i really like about her, is she's an equal opportunity person. she gets -- she gets in the prosecution's face. she gets in the defense's face. that's all i ever ask. now i know she's got issues with don west and i don't know if there is a history there. maybe somebody else can tell me. a lot of times i just respect a judge. i don't mind if they get into my face, as long as they do it the same time with the prosecution, and i think she's handled this case as well as anybody could have. >> does it ever pay to argue with the judge? >> sometimes, yeah, most judges will listen to you and some of these legal arguments could go eit

the pendulum has swung. government spending has fall. >> fran: 25% -- has fallen from 25% to 22%. i believe in the next few years, i don't know if it's five or ten, we're actually going to deal with entitlements. and this stock market could go to 35,000 if that happens. >> i hope so. you guys are making me feel really good. here's the point. how much of the gdp and earnings that you crow about all the time were based on levitating a consumption bubble? you guys totally missed that. day in and day out. >> that's where you and i disagree. i spent the last segment -- i think the most powerful force in the economy is not the federal reserve, but business and the entrepreneur. and i think it's the profitability of business which came out of the blue back in 2009 that has driven this stock market and the economy in the face of a lot of governmental opposition. >> consumption. credit card account up $20 billion, it's predicated on borrowing money. >> there's nothing on the gdp 17 million. go ahead. >> let me say this a different way. ben bernanke did not invent hydraulic fracturing. he d

now the pendulum is turning, swinging, so you have james sensenbrenner, the guy who wrote the patriot act, he said these things are supposed to sunset in 2015. we may not renew them. that shows a lot of things are happening. >> the debate is not cutting along party lines which is also a fantastic thing. >> that's what's so interesting about the fact that this is now -- you were able to get nearly 100 republicans voting against it. and it's just, frankly, i think the fact that it's something the obama administration was hiding from the american public. so you're actually getting people breaking from their partisan lines i think for frankly cheap political reasons but at least it's allowing us to have more of a conversation and have people, you know, the sort of libertarian wing -- >> libertarians on each side joining together. >> exactly. let me also say there is a question of the sort of ideological debate. there is the money here. we talk about the things that we are ready to gut. many earned benefit programs. defense and the question of being strong on terror is still, i think, that

if the pendulum gets pushed too far one day they get up and they shove it back where it belongs. that. now is it possible there is a tipping point the pendulum gets shoved too far one way and you can't get it back? i suppose there is a tin plate pagen have we reached it? i doubt it. i think -- i have enormous confidence in the american people. think of all the people that rushed into the world trade center and new york. the people when it was attacked. think of the people that question to the pentagon and started pushing people out that were burned in the dining and injured and frightened. the american people have a lot. these streets were not paved with gold and the people that came from other countries and that built it into what it is. i have a web site, rumsfeld.com. i put a speech by adamle stevenson that was given to my class in college in 1954. and if you have got young people that are wondering about the world, read that speech by adamle stevenson. he had to have any democrat. i don't think that he would have been a terribly good president to be honest with you. he was ki

. >> isn't that interesting how the pendulum has swung back and forth about stand your ground's applicability to this case? initially this case got a lot of attention among other reasons because it seemed like a stand your ground case. many people criticized the stand your ground law, myself included, for the idea that somebody can just stand there and fight back instead of retreats, which would avert a lot of violence. then there was a chance for the defense before this trial to have a stand your ground hearing, have a hearing without a jury, just in front of the judge. if they could establish facts sufficient to prove stand your ground, this trial would never have happened. mark o'mara said, we're not going to do that. we're going to waive george zimmerman's stand your ground right. bottom line, they decided to go to a jury. george zimmerman's story is really not a stand your ground kind of story. he says he's pinned down with trayvon martin on top of him, ground and pay mma style. obviously, he wouldn't have an opportunity to retreat if that's what were going on. now we're back to having s

i do worry about the pendulum swinging more than it should. certainly writing this book and getting the sense of the strength of the isolationist argument was quite powerful. one of the things i relayed in the book is when churchill was meeting roosevelt in the atlantic conference off the coast of new foundland, the congress by only one vote just failed to renew the peacetime draft. in other words, one other vote against it and the army would have been sent home even as roosevelt was peting with church toil decide the fate of the world so things like that do give you pause. the other big question is not simply how much we do in the world but the balance between what we do in the world and what we do here at home. it is about your book. i have recently come up with a book, with des fini, foreign policy that the real threats are domestic. our economy is growing slower than it should, our infrastructure isn't there. our schools an. what they need to be. and what these things often have in common is not the lack of ideas but our political system.

think i've recently started hearing in the past few weeks and months a lot of chatter about the pendulum going back from become 24/7 connected all the time to people wanting some time to unplug to disconnect. digitally detox, and there's a hotel in d.c. that locks your phone up when you check in. >> people are responding. >> people are paying for that. so i think people are really seeing, they're recognizing that we're almost kind of tech addicted and tech affected in our culture and we need to reclaim a little of our life back. but that also drew me to write a children's book because it's not just the adults that are tech-obsessed. my own two-year-old son will walk up to a picture frame and swipe and it ask for elmo and barney. so we live in this culture, even our tad -- toddlers are tech-obsessed,. >> when it comes to the children's book, how do you approach it? >> the children's book has a strong e-mail, ticket character named dot, really spunky little girl. she has her phone and tab president and she is skyping and talking to everyone all the time, and her mob kind of force -- hi mom

watch the pendulum has swung. we may be at a point now where there is a little correcting after 9/11. going into election year, what are the politics? >> this was a real demonstration. you had house republican and democratic leadership on the same side of the issue with the white house. then you had so many members voting to restrict this program. i think the fact that you solve the head of the house and senate intelligence committee consent publicly to examining how to possibly bring this and are put in more privacy protections as an example of what they are willing to do as a first step and if they can do that that they can get agreement on it and put that in place and maybe that will be enough to hold it off. it depends on what transpires and whether it continues to down political discourse. a lot depends on how quickly edward snowden situation where there in russia or back in the united states is settled. >> thank you for your questions. we appreciate it. [captioning performed by national captioning institute]

and they're really trying to at least skew the pendulum so that it focuses directly on fbi. >> then youe all these jurors, deborah feyerick, right, who've been sitting day after day after day taking in all this testimony. and here you have -- tell me more about this request from the defense team to sequester the juror, what, for deliberation? >> for deliberations. that's exactly right. the defense lawyer is basically saying there's been so much written about this, what if they accidentally see something in the 11th hour that perhaps skews their opinion. the defense has been very, very frustrated that there's a gag order. so oftentimes we see these cases being tried in the court of public opinion. but bulger's lawyer has not even had the opportunity to take the microphone because the judge has said absolutely not. they're trying to sequester the jury. the prosecution believes it's not necessary. he believes -- the prosecution believes, in fact, they've been following the rules and that they'll continue to follow the rules. and that, you know, sort of at the 11th hour to put everybody int

>> we certainly see the pendulum swinging back and forth here.now, now the military being in charge and this chaos on the streets. in a way it's not surprising because most revolutions do play out like this. you have act one, act two and you hope that eventually it stabilizes. and that really, i think, needs to be what the united states is focused on is trying to get the situation stabilized, trying to sort of use whatever influence we have with all the parties, not just the military or just the islamists, to get off the street and work out differences across the negotiating table. jenna: one of the questions that comes up while that's all happening is what our policy should be toward the country at this time. on the bloomberg news rep site, the editorial board there says we cannot continue our foreign aid to egypt right now because we don't know anything about the government. what should we do? >> look. i think whenever you're talking about a sort of chaotic foreign policy like this, you have to think what are our interests and what's the outcom

i think the pendulum was ready to swung back before bush stole the second election, and it has swung georgey zimmerman warehouse of lies. couldn't she have literally just said, wow, we felt he was lying? i keep hearing people say the way the law was written -- almost like it was a forgone conclusion. he had so many freakin' lies and what she should have said is three people felt he was guilty two who didn't want him to be guilty, and then there was me and we convinced the other ones. >> stephanie: i was reading christopher jargon who made the same point, that if there is a civil trial, it could go the same way that the oj trial did. >> caller: i hope so. he lied about so many freakin' things. how did this kid see the gun if it was tucked behind him. and she just believed get little georgy. >> stephanie: it seems creepy to call him georgy also. >> caller: and jim i love your impersonation. >> stephanie: that is one creepy cracker that mark o'mara. >> i don't -- i don't think this is right. i think race shouldn't be an issue at all. he had a big piece of concrete with him. >> stephanie

as civil society that once was the pendulum of doing something that once was making sure all of thiscampaigns to be the dumbest to make sure the donuts are giving them the money today. they would like to say against the particular don't as a we have a loud -- you are talking to the taliban. that shows a change in afghanistan. also, we are starting a program called imagine leaders. we're working with young people of afghanistan to empower them so that they can take a leadership of afghanistan society in the future. i was so inspired when one of the speakers went up there. the members of the program saying, you know, five you to go or 10 years ago leadership and supreme leader was defined by ethnicity base, i how much money you have, how much -- today is defined by how much you can serve, by what you believe. so that's a chain that's unfolding in afghanistan, and a new generation is leading this change. also, just my last point. i know rachel is looking at me. how we see a new afghanistan what comes to civil society. that's sort of traditional society organizations, we are seeing the e

. >> i think the pendulum swings back and forth. >> myanmar is something else. >> 60 million people. >> i know. >> amazing. >> well, i don't know. we're out of time. >> we will have enough time when we go to dinner. when i claim my bet. >> i mention it every time and you never follow through. and i get the message. i get the message. it's bad. >> can we bring andrew, too? >> definitely. >> to balance things out. >> we'll all go. >> i would love that. we won't even go through the drive-through. >> we can talk fashion sense. >> yes. we'll eat in the ronald mcdonald -- >> is that where we're going? >> thank you. good to see you that morning. >> thank you very much. >> he has some better clients than that. we can go there. >> you've been very quiet. >> i wanted to talk about netflix and facebook and -- the fabulous fab. he's heading to court in new york. the charges against the former goldman sachs trader. mary thompson will join us with a look at that trial when we return. >>> welcome back to "squawk box." three years after the s.e.c. charged him with securities fraud the trial of forme

government has gone too far and the pendulum needs to swing back the other way. try to withhold judgment because i'm a reporter and report the facts. that is where we are in terms of an argument. host: for lawler -- fort lauderdale, religion. caller: it seems it may we are pretty cut and dry. he took how many computers full of information and he is basically throwing it out there and offering it for sale to the highest bidder. speaks to the lackadaisical security ongoing of the nsa. why is this information even allowed to be transferred to a portable computer? would you like to comment on that? guest: there are two observations are. the first one, you said something people would disagree with which is that he's announcing this information is for sale. there's been no indication that he is trying to turn over the information to china or russia or that he is trying to make money off of it. i'm not defending him, he's not putting it out there for sale. todoes look like he's going great length to keep the information encrypted and keep it so it does not get out there

>> i do not think that the country operates like a pendulum, swinging to the left and right. i think that in some respects it is more like a rubrics cuba.-- rubix cube. there are areas where we are advancing and areas where others with different views are advancing. the white house advancing on a number of fronts through the supreme court right now, often times by violating rules of government, changing rules, passing one is that no one has read through a traditional filibuster system. changing washington permanently. but they are not winning all the battles. at a state and local level there have been a lot of changes their in the last two years to three years that are very healthy for country. you have a lot more leaders at the local level that believe in these principles over centralizing government and having to make all these decisions for us. there is a much higher level of support among students today than there have been in many times in recent years. sonograms alone, understanding and other human life being involved, that has dramatically changed the numbers on those

that period ended when the pendulum of trying to swing back and forth between the inner afghanistan andhe outer world, it just, it started to swing so fast and so far that it finally crashed, and the country succumbed to a coup by a small communist group which then quickly was followed by the soviet invasion. and i would contend that from that day to this we are still in the aftermath and the after effects of the soviet invasion. the soviet invasion pretty much destroyed the fabric of the country, you know? the six million refugees that it drove out of the country, the destruction of the villages, the tearing apart of the tribal structures and the creation of a state of what in which -- of war in which, you know, the old traditional afghan systems for generating leadership gave way to a new system which was in that state of chaos if you had a gun and you were good with it, you were probably going to end up being an important guy. so that, you know, brought into being a whole other class of calf began, you know, leaders -- of afghan, you know, leaders who are commanders. now they call th

has succeeded in stopping the momentum of the rebels, but with sufficient military support, the pendulum in fact swing back toward the rebels. i strongly disagree with those who suggest that the opposition rebels could somehow turn out to be worse than the nightmare that has unfolded. increasing america's assistance to syrian rebels short of boots on the ground must be decisive and strategic in order to be effective. that does not mean we send arms freely to all rebels. i challenge the notion that in sending military aid, we forfeit the authority to choose which rebel leaders to support. i would also point out to members that both the chairman of the joint chiefs of staff martin dempsey and former defense secretary leon panetta have testified before the senate armed services committee that within the administration, they argued in favor of arming the rebels. general salim idris, chief of staff of the u.s. backed supreme council, has emerged has anything but a radical islamist in presiding over the armed opposition and serving as a conduit for military aid. a "new york times" profile desc

>> i do not think that the country operates like a pendulum, swinging to the left and right. i think that in some respects it is more like a rubrics cuba. there are areas where we are advancing and areas where others with different views are advancing. the white house advancing on a number of fronts through the supreme court right now, often times by violating rules of government, changing rules, passing one is that no one has read through a traditional filibuster system. permanently.ington but they are not winning all the battles. at a state and local level there have been a lot of changes their in the last two years to three years that are very healthy for country. you have a lot more leaders at the local level that believe in these principles over centralizing government and having to make all these decisions for us. there is a much higher level of support among students today than there have been in many times in recent years. sonograms alone, understanding and other human life being involved, that has dramatically changed the numbers on those questions. to rotc.ready all