at around 10:0030 peopler in lake barry esa suffered from hypothermia. emt easy say they weren't wearing norm uh clothing for the freezing temperatures and rain. they were bussed to a warming center where they all recovered. another cyclist crashed and went to the hospital. >>> we have new did he tails on a sunken barge in the san francisco beau bay. abc 7 news was under the bay bridge where it sank early friday and began spewing oil. they surveyed the damage from the water and the air today. they want to make sure it won't get worse before they take the next step. >> since the vents are plugged we're going to be looking closely at the conditions of what we find under water and then we'll make a determination as to whether we want to pump the product off first before raising it or just secure everything and then raise the barge. >> the coast guard won't know how much oil spilled until the barge is raised and the fuel in the tank is measured. so far no reports of affected wildlife. we were at san jose college today where residents received free help setti

soledad: what are the things peoplere angry about? i have my own list, which i will go through but i'm going to guess , my list and your list will overlap a little bit. mr. womack: probably so, people are upset over a range of issues, not the least of which the fact that trump was elected president of the u.s. people are anxious and uneasy right now about what the immediate future and rex and of our country is. we have a lot of pending issues, not the least of which the fact that we don't have a funding mechanism for government beyond next friday. funding for the government runs out, congress will go back on tuesday and we have four days to out this behind us. soledad: you have a gop controlled house, a gop controlled senate, and a gop controlled white house, how not have a budget? mr. womack: typical of congress, we wait to the last minute. we kick the can down the road again and again. the issues don't get easier, they get compounded when you wait to the last minute. you end up sometimes with bad deals. this is not the way the ameri

of we worked 45 years to be repaid our pension peopler wonder what is rightfully theirs. what can be done quite. >> the government has taken steps the extra funding has been made available from to be sure that is effective in times of these changes but to talk about pensions for the future there is a very clear choice in this election between the of labour party and a conservative government those basic pensioners but you only get that with a strong economy the sodomy finally emerged from the labor economic crash so will be no sea is to crash theo economy with more debt higher taxes fewer jobs that does nothing for ordinary working families. >> mr. speaker millions of women would have heard that answer. labor will guarantee that to pull more. in to move the goalposts looking forward to retirement. witnessing the labor founding of the national health service that made health care available for the many. not just a few. that i am 88. sam stared at the thought of going into the hospital.th so more people in the corridors. thanks to those cuts so long is this government remai

hire peoplere we do and we do sponsor them, at the end of the day, why we are hiring in tech is because we need talent. the competition to pay somebody $10,000 more or less does not even figure in. know what good talent can do. especially in our part of the country, and our part of the economy, it is the knowledge and skills a worker has, so it is, again, very simplest it to make these broad, generalized statement. it is a question of skill, experience. are we going to nickel and dime on $5,000, 10 thousand dollars, 20,000 dollars, $30,000? of course not. they are painting this terrible scenario, and i think it does a terrible disservice to folks who are listening throughout this part of the country and are again unfortunately with duck into this hysteria -- they are --in unfortunately with up they are again unfortunately whipped up into this hysteria. the story today is the story 20 years ago -- who loses in terms of the competitive effects of immigration into the united states, to the effect that it is best to the extent that it is discernible. tina populations lose. one is other rece

>> a lot of peoplere talking about what the trump doctrines on foreign policy, what it ma r may or mayand the president stated it was very flexible. do you know what the trump doctrine is on foreign policy and can you explain that to us? >> i think the trump doctrine is something he articulated throughout the campaign which is america first. we're going to make sure our national interests are protected that, we do what we can to make sure our interests both economically and national security are at the forefront. we're not just going to become the policemen running around the world, but we have to have a clear and defined national interest wherever we act and that it's our national security first and foremost that has to deal with how we act. >> action in syria fits in that doctrine? >> absolutely. i think if you recognize the threat that our country and our people face if there is a growth of use or spread of chemical weapons of mass destruction, those -- the proliferation of those, the spread to other groups is a clear danger to our country and to our people. krist kristin? >> what y

i am going to avoid that delicate subject as assiduously as other peoplers have done this week. but what i want to look into is not only how lincoln and the nation got to this point, but how lincoln developed from his youth, how did he get to his position on immigration from the beginning? his record on immigration often gets lost in his focus and our understandable focus on lincoln and slavery. interestingly, while he can be said to have evolved slowly on national authority over slavery, especially where it existed, and on equal rights, he was consistently enlightened about immigration, just not always publicly. and that's one of the points i want to write -- to talk about today. like some politicians then and now, i know it's hard to believe this about politicians, sometimes he had one public position and one private position. so let's go to the beginning, not the very beginning. consider his origins. lincoln was not born in a metropolis teeming with foreigners from whom he'd get first-hand experience. he neither observed or reacted to ethnic diversity. his parents and grandpa

very few peoplere saying there is no rm for better border security, but there is such an increase in spending over the last 20 years, most people missed the fact that there is triple layer security. how does it play in arizona. there is obviously close to the very top of the list for most of your audience? >> first i wanted to point out that canadian cows are a danger to america. the president has been talking about canadian dairy farming as well. back here on our side of the border down south, a lot of people who are for more border security realize the wall is never going to get built the way he talked about on the campaign trail. not the way he envisions it. the conversation goes on and we continue to talk about the border. it's still not secure. that's not good for immigrants either. down near tucson, they have to bring in a refrigerator truck to keep the bodies who were not able to cross the desert. to to sometimy that flow when it's 115 degrees, it's for their safety as well. >> i hear your point that we don't want people dieing in the desert, but i'm not sure it's good for the

the first hint i had that this was happening, i noticed peopler went from talking to experts skeptically, no one ever, i certainly don't ever advisede people, if your doctor walks in with a big needle, go ahead, i don't know what it is, hit me up.nt of course not. i want people to be informed that i want them to ask questions. i want them to be participants in their health and society. this was born out of more than skepticism about expertise. this was people who were lecturing back to experts as if they were peers. i found that remarkable. the word i used throughout theis book is that i said this is part of an epidemic of narcissism in our society that is really out of control.und is i my background is primarily in russian studies.d during i know i am deceptively youthful looking, but i actually got my career started during the cold war and i was a russian-speaking kremlin guy. that's what i did for a good part of my professional and academic career. i was used to people saying you guys are going to screw up the world, blow up the paint planet. i understood that. in later years, when i

they are showing up on their own, not being paid to show up, but being organized by peoplere who are paid. >> dana: nothing wrong with organizing. >> these are the official talking points. denham, you're not done. since when do we not calln a congressman or congressperson by that title?e remember when barbara boxer said, "i worked a long time to earn the title of senator." >> dana: you will call me by that title. >> now the protesters are so disrespectful, and i think that's going to backfire against the democrats and help the republicans because in the end, the american people are wanting you to get the job done. >> dana: zoom out and talk to me a little bit about the bigger picture demographic changes in the suburban districts, because if elections are won in the suburbs, what kind of changes are republicans and democrats c looking at in the next -- ict don't want to talk about 2018, i'm thinking maybe five to ten years from now. >> it's whoever can get theye working class and the middle class to go for the same candidate wins. t what has happened with the democrats is they get the

d i thk that the american peoplere actually a lot more patient than we give them credit for. the implications here, the president certainly doesn't want a government shut down in the first 100 days of his first term. and so it's not worth fighting over now. but as we saw him say yesterday, he looks forward to having this debate for the rest of the year and certainly getting it done by september. stuart: now, there's a very big and important meeting coming up tonight in the white house. president trump's economic team will not square off but will meet with the top republicans in congress. they're talking about this tax cut. 15% on corporate profits. i suspect that the president and his team might be doing a little laying down of the law to the republican party. this is it. get it done. you think? >> well, and this is a very smart strategy because when you look at the way that the health care legislation and obamacare repeal went down, there was a conassesses at the beginning about where the legislation was supposed to go. it was kind of rolled out and then people decided they

peoplere now studies of in their 70's and 80's who have the brain of a 20-year-old, and it is really interesting. they are people who pushed through, who are constantly learning. when it is hard to learn, they push out of their comfort zones. there are people who manage stress differently than a lot of other people. we are ballooning -- we are beginning to learn a lot of things about how the brain ages. one of the things for advocating is a holistic approach. staying socially engaged, exercising. every researcher and dr. i've spoken to say exercise, exercise, exercise. that pushes blood to the brain. healthy mind or brain diet, exercising, learning new things, challenging yourself out of the comfort zone, eating properly, meditation, mindfulness, turning off technology, resting your brain, sleeping. thingsre all lifestyles, we are now learning affect not just the body, but the brain, and we can start doing that when people are very young. as i've said, alzheimer's manifests 20 years in your brain. get is a message we want to up to 30, 40, 50-year-olds, and particularly to women who a

they reported sales weren't as bad as some peopler with afraid of.ale revenue is still down 8% compared to last year but better than expected and they had 9 million new active monthly users. best in two years. good news in twitter. haven't seen it a lot. finally, keep an eye on the s&p 500, look, 2395. we get over that, that's a new historic closing high. guys, the thing that matters this week, lower geopolitical risk, lower earnings risk important the full year, and also tax cuts now in play? three of the four big risk factors a little lower this week and that's why stocks are sitting near historic highs. back to you. >> all right, bob. thank you. we will see you later at the close. let's get to our "closing bell" exchange for this busy wednesday. joining us, hank smith from haverford trust, stephen guilfoyle from "the street.com." sarge, doe spite the pundits who worry this market is overvalued, it is showing no signs of pulling back, especially on a day like today which could be vulnerable to whatever comes out of washington after two big up days

secretary, i wanted to get your comments on a story picked up by politico this morning about peoplerhis program. they write -- is navarro losing influence, prompt's reversal on labeling china as a currency manipulator, as well as an overall softer stance. have raised questions about the role of a top member of his cabinet. what do you think about that? >> first of all, i think politico and other people observing the white house love to stir up controversy, and it makes people read that media. that doesn't surprise me too much. but if i'm not mistaken, while i was in japan, peter was very much with the president out in wisconsin when they were announcing the buy america/hire america program. i don't see any signs of the sort of dissent that are being chronicl chronicled. what i do see is something you would normally see in a new administration. there naturally is some pulling and tugging within the administration, some different points of view. there's always a shakedown cruise for any new administration. but that's healthy. that means that different views are vetted and when the pres