peralta llc, which is not the case. so we're finding that to be, um, an error on the part of the applicant and we're not going to move forward with a permit with errors. so yeah, so in the spirit of when we when we approve of parliament , we say we approved this permit because it was properly issued. when you're saying this was improperly issued, so it's null and void regardless of who owns it? who has an easement? whether it looks good looks bad is create security doesn't allows the public access or not, it was improperly issued, so it should be no envoy in the first place. that's correct. now i understand that there's and solve an answer a lot of questions here tonight , but i would like to go ahead and it's the best answer i've had all night. this mr matt green to elaborate on the specific requirements of a bill. permit because that's believed his sort of, um expertise. okay um and so just one other question along, but so it's improperly issued because the owner ah, the owner didn't. file the permit and, uh, can. in