percent since 19986 we've essentially loud 25 percent growth since 1986 to the benefit of our economy and using steno percent lass less water he talked about the state requirement for the cut back i agree with the state board they've been thoughtful and your service area a unique it is in the course in that the individual bosco agencies in those year from 8 to 236 percent but 8 of the agencies are in the lowest year their bosco agencies so a huge number of agencies with the lowest network and in fact some of the agencies exceeded their starting with their reductions so that goess means we've done a good job but need to maintain the actions to make sure that the customers continue it reduce their water use so what are the agencies doing to expanding their forest they're hiring staff and got several agencies it increases their infrastructure for example the city of sgrooun has a change over at the one of the month to month and their implementing negligence eir things like the water reports program that gets position into the customers hundreds what does it mean for them and the pg&e you

the percent that are from the priority nirebds is 76 percent. what we have at this point at the end of april is a hiring deficit of 19. they have a ways to go to catch up with that, but we are on a upward trajectory. just a couple more slides, i thought this may be of interest. for the 45 system hires this breaks s down what occupations folks have gaulten at cpmc. maybe one way to look at this and how the system looks that the hires, if you look at clinical position and positions that deal with patient versus non clinical, 18 of the 45 oare clinical and 4 [inaudible] >> can i clarify one question? >> sur >> so the good faith effort are supposed to reach 40 percent of all entry level job openings, but what did you say was the prertage that they reached-19 percent deficit, what is the percentage they reached? >> on that slide if you look that third column they are at 28 percent #23r5u78 the project beginning through the most recent data available which is april 2015 and that creates a hiring deficit of 19 >> since they didn't meet the 40 percent t

20 percent cut. since then with whatever new money we squeezed out we have inkrimental be restoring the money to small z midsize organizations and have not given any new money to the major 6 organizations. to put that into perspective, currently the largest 6 institutions are 30 percent below what their peek funding level was, where the small and midsize organizations are only 8 percent below what their peek funding levels were >> a comment from the chair, the problem i have is i want to know the dollar amount, not the percentage because you can vaa larger institution getting 70 thousand dollars and have a smul institution that gets 10 thousand dollars and then you talk about percentages, there is no comparison. the dollar amounts of what these entities are receiving make more sense to me. the percentages are not helpful because you are splaing the difference, but i need dollar amounts to really understand what the impacts are. >> i understand that. i don't have the dollars mount. we can get that to

there's are increase but they've over 50 percent of the goal that was created to reach 50 percent focusing on 5. >> can i ask you a question. >> i indicated richmond has more resources it's not a particularly place whether there is vibrant crime but is there something unique about richmond beyond the legislation here. >> you know i didn't attribute it to you talked to the captain silverman of richmond he dedicates officers to do traffic i've explained to other commander that is how he awe attended his goals it is staevenl a little bit less crime better to be safe than sorry but we're down on staffing here so again, he was call is a luxury the dedicated officers to do traffic enforcement he has tenacious officers that like to write tickets and this is on the subject overall - i also see the increase is dramatically (inaudible) the captain on those issues. >> well, i i know that he donna does a lot of pedestrian enforcement in the tenderloin and failure to yield to pedestrians is a focus think the 5 i also think that came up there was a particular low number of citations so there's an approa

reduction statewide 25 percent but in the wholesale service arresting area that is a 17 percent reduction and 8 of the 23 agencies in that lowest per capital are the wholesaler customers reflective of the fact it is not on san francisco with the 17 percent capital there's a number of whol use category and again important when we drive how to achieve our savings in fact, from 10 of the agencies met or exceeded from the june to february period and they overall achieved 14 percent so very close to the 17 percent in the past actions going forward >> give us a sense the breakdown like i said there are 8 agencies in the 8 percent category one in the telephone and 8 in the 16 percent together that is 18 agrees and that represents 73 percent that is supplied in the wholesale areas that's a pretty important where's the opportunity for savings and also realistically who agencies in the highest group they don't serve a lot of water not to say we're not attacking those and the agencies are not after the savings but not where the bulk of the water is those are two speculate agencies and the budget is

government audit & oversight commission u citywide breakdown of citation issuance and we're 83 at 24 percent of the steernz they're in there and another large number the number one issue was cell phone and tint driving and april was distracking driving month the distransacted driving leads to outlet issues our biggest category as it is every year as others that includes the 4 hundred and 50 code violations that people while driving this is the mode 2014 is obviously the most complete data it was not complete we collected mid year around 2013 and going forward i predict it will get better bless you. >> as you can see 201494 percent of citations were issued to drivers of vehicles whether motor vehicles or cars and one percent for bicyclists and then again, here's the by showing what - who we gave citations to this is self-explanatory 2013 versus 20142014 was the highest number of citations by the san francisco police department because everybody was focusing on reducing collisions which is one of our preliminary responsibility facility and traffic reduced collisions and reducing crime in gener

of affordable housing are the other goal of 60 percent or the 33 percent within prop k the housing balance initiative that stated that the city shall strife to achieve 33 percent of low middle-income plans and special use district with significantly increased development potential my hope we're thinking strategizing open that level of meeting those luckiest i didn't goals and lastly the couple of small site fund i see that as a strategic as we see the shrinking the rent control stock to rehab buildings of resident whether land trust or whatever so we stop the tremendous sliveng of the affordable housing stock in the city that's all the stuff against the wall. >> let's start with the question of the goals clearly the office is focused on adding the mayors goal of the thirty thousand and we have a plan a plan to meet that goal and we have preponderance identified we have land identified some of the plan is con migrant that on how quickly we reach those goals and are contingent baton resources we have a plan to meet the 10 thousand goal the goal that - can you say even prop k explicitly state

and pedestrian right-of-way is 16 percent and we go down to red light violations 15 unsafety turning 14 and starting and backing is 24 percent we won't change much from 2014 to 2015 but whatever the citation we'll pull the folks over and the collision data the most important thing will will come from the law enforcement slash pedestrian we'll reduce it overhead the numbers for collision severe injuries up the most important fatalities are down 5 of percent and never good it should be zero now but we're not there the upside is that the categories that are up they're down in pedestrian and bicycle injuries they're up in vehicle injuries if that makes sense so i see that as a positive but again one death is too many so i know you have a lot of questions there are a lot of people that what answer them and a lot of people to follow up further on the presentation as well through the chair i didn't catch the number you read of the citations for don't blocking the box and over 3 thousand. >> okay. i heard the 3 and think i noticed that you know in 2013 we saw 23 percent of all citations were

it took place but 80 percent is a good number and after that video came out we realized to the advocates they can attach it to their website as well not long after we released that i did an i think formal inquire and found they were not educated on the vision zero and our role i sent everyone in the department an individual e-mail getting to vision zero by 2024 improvement and education wherever they can what happens in our plod monthly district captains 80 are the target the highest collision intersection focus on the top factors to those orders are based on static data derived from issues in the link and they again have their resources focused on those high collision coordinators and those factors also the traffic company the citywide enforcement they summit the vision zero wherever they can special prargsdz we've done again around center issued a hundred citations around the most at risks populations injured and so forth we have done education components within the centers themselves teaching seniors and children about traffic safety since december of labor we did a block to block enf

of the interruptable customers to thirty percent would that work or 25 percent of 35 percent some kind of differential between the two classes of folks. >> we could access it we would like to get moving open that sooner than later certainly send a message to the irrigation accounts and everyone needs to cut back their use by 25 percent we can bring back the interruptable pies at the next meeting with modifications for the interruptable customers potentially increasing that or the choice of the commission. >> interesting thought. >> coming back i think at the next meeting will be fine i mean it's a little bit auditor afterward it is under review. >> a minimum of 25 percent i think if i captured the meadow of the commission right we're not talking about backing counsel on that number at all. >> okay. i'm getting a hid node i don't know if this needs to be i'll ask a question does that need to be in a form of the motion. >> i didn't about mr. richie is asking to pass this package together and could be to you with more information on the interruptable customers. >> does that change the res

shy of 10 percent at year 24 and high 16 percent at year 24 we've conducted analysis of the option tonvest and b.a. helped us looking at two of the forks one the construction costs go up and we looked at 24 percent more construction costs overall budget and there's no special event revenue the port will reearner that $204 million over term with the 8 percent but not participate in additional cash flow the port will be doing an opportunity cost so you can make this decision in the summer to side was are the benefits relative to this purpose to generate more revenue along our waft waterfront this chart shows the graphic i've shown in a bar charter to show you the revenue we believe this proposal meets the standard it provides an ongoing revenue stream to the port we have not had from the facility for 0 long time we building we can offer this investment that is creative and interesting and want you to explore in terms of blebz the partners is an lbe they have an outreach program and center identified where lbes participate including janitorial and evaluate parking and market services we'

>> so it might be related to this i'm saying a 5 percent increase how - and yes, sir. that's absolutely correct thank you all for your questions we're back to the final stages every item 3 yes, sir. their estimate to go up by - >> so it is now addressed now to how much of this 5 percent patient and plus dr. >> wait, wait you're seeing to page 8 oh, and page 8 of the presentation. >> yes, sir. back to our question i got a little bit confused. >> you're saying 4.7 i think that is more but the pharmacies is 8 percent and i think some of those are attributable to the speciality jobs and pharmaceuticals and 5 percent that's the reason i ask that when you go to the doctors their complaining and brown and toland they're saying there's an increase. >> the projected capitation rate for 2016 is 5 percentage higher than than the experienced capitation rate of january and 2014 - february 2014 and january 2015 so actually a 23 month trend number i'm getting a number it averages 2 and a half percent per year. >> i thought a visit to brown and toland doctors are complaining their inc

percent and wissop is nearly 89 percent completed and so we've made about 10 percent project findings of last year pursue now we're getting on the flat part the typical project of s curve we're going to start seeing less kick notes as we go forward over the next few years weaves made substantial progress ners in terms of the progress the majority of activity is in construction with 14 actual projects in construction with the total cost of nearly 2 points $5 million but we have completed 65 projects which have either been totally completed or construction is completed and then we have to projects preconstruction the alameda creek capture project and the ground water storage the overall project is on budget of $.67 million and for completion in may with you have a number of accomplishments i want to highlight a couple we were awarded the region storage those are 14 of the 15 we need we'll bid out two additional wells we have land assess issues a separate contractor next year but we completed final administrative close out of the treatment facility within the main contract of the truit u

yeah 5 years and 5 percent of the shares then it is a stronger position so that the spirit of level 2 for the social engagement i think we should number one give lead time before the votes are taken and two actively work with the pensions and that's the spirit of level 2 thank you. >> great. thank you very much for the presentation will you please call item number 9, 9. >> it's been continued until the june meeting item number 9 action item approval to commitment neuro to item 6 sir. >> peter and tanya and gregg are on their ways up board members on page 1 when you look under the investment strategy it should read real estate there's a word missing under the investment strategies i'm going studio see if i can print something on the computer. >> art is on his way now would you like us to wait it will be a minute. >> he needs to print something off so a two minute break. >> one. >> one. >> we'll just wait it won't be a two minute break so - >> i'll do a little bit of stand up (laughter) please present to you a real estate investment with the norwayic partners i'm sure you're aware of

seven percent and even around 7 percent is not easy as i said last time. it's achievable and around seven percent and definitely it can grow for the second quarter and maybe lower than the first quarter. >> since you're expecting further rate cuts will these cuts lead to stronger data and to a stronger economy? >> well nothings safe or guaranteed. the pblc has to do so. as we all know just look at the data from last week to up to now. cpi is worse than expected and expert data was just totally disaster. why? because they appreciate over a lot of agencies and the european dollar. it just happens outside and doing very bad especially in europe so the strong is giving a pretty de lima. if it depreciates too much it that may affect the problem. it maybe too strong and hurt the export so what i believe is easing monitoring policies and it's the only thing that it can do. so another rate cut and then another one followed and that's basically not asked. >> and they have turned to easing when they needed to prop up the economy. some say that they should allow it t

one dollars 8 if to january $2,015,189 that increase from $4 to $400 is approximately 10 thousand percent increase i did the math semester over 10 thousand percentage inflicting increase i understand it is necessary for the sfoifks i did want to go ahead and put a face to that decision someone like myself that doesn't open an enrollment package i thought everything was fine and never a reason to word otherwise i was shocked when it hit hi paycheck it forced me to seek additional employment that has to occur outside of my working for the city i come to you today is it fair to say nothing to be done i understand i put many a po we read about working families drive out of city and county of san francisco one e-mail could have solved interest problem less than 10 percent on the ppo plan or the most recent numbers indicate one e-mail having could have stopped this in m in class 1244 clarification i ask you consider a notification outside of the some pact that is sent to any home address especially in this day and age it appropriate thank you for your time. >> thank you for bringing this to our

of general revenues our goal is 10 percent we not to talk about uncertainty and talk about waiting to see the final relatives of what happens in the current fiscal year and the vulnerability of the business tax after our shift as we transition into a business television station you've heard about the affordable health care act and the effect on public health revenues we had big swings related last year to this and finally a sort of new issue on the plate is an board of appeals decision against the city that requires us to pay supplemental cola's to employment's the appeal to the supreme court has 90 days to say if they'll review the case we'll have more information soon this will have a short time effect in re2r5k9d payments the real substance is to increase the city rates into the future so this is a very kind of large potential impact we're working with the retirement system and their tuffries. >> in terms of that item do we know when we're going to have instructions. >> we'll start rivera against the retroactive payment. >> we we don't know we have not planned too much around yet t

and up to the a hundred percent the - it didn't speak to that pretty large and struggling demographic am i right? >> you're nodding your head other people a am i correct. >> we'll agree you're correct it is focused on that zero to 60 percent. >> and well, it is zero to percent you're not going to get down to this priority unless we have important surplus property than we released so you want to be clear i think when you talk about prop k for example there is a massive desire in this city for affordable housing at all levels very low for formally homeless and at poverty level for low income that are working and for moderate income that was what prop k was about san franciscans saying we want affordable housing at all levels not just one level and not the other so the surplus property ordinance is one piece of that i don't know if surplus ordinance should be revisited to make it more flexible the dollars or the property more flexible in meeting all the needs if we're going to talk about using property that's been intended perhaps is an office building and talking about taking that out o

hospital and one of the persons that spoke mentioned there was a recommendation about 25 percent hiring increase to prevent a metal down at the hospital what is happening to prevent that meltdown. >> in los angeles. >> we have a schedule for hire it is bans the budget and based on the needs of hospital and we're hiring every month towards those targets i don't think we're going to have a problem opening and hire in the hospital wife added those into the picture they're in in the pool we're hiring we're on track and we'll be fine in opening the new hospitals in terms of the leans h.r. did 5 lean event and maybe 27 lean events that is a different lean event in the emergency so i can't speak on that. >> thank you, mr. wagner and we'll wrap up. >> i'll add supervisor we'll be continuously evaluate as we get into the new building with motion and staffing studies for the workload that's part of our continuous evaluation. >> i'll appreciate that my office be appraised how things are moving along thank you very much so i want to thank my colleagues and sitting in on the hearing folks from dph a

of participation or sbe 43 percent m b e and others one percent and special note david barker the architects is the primary architect on the development has partnered with gonzales arithmetic that laip owned san francisco based on small enterprise and during the predevelopment period this is a strong and positive spook of the predevelopment state and the developer is committed to the achievement for the goals during the construction phase okay mission bay cac has been supportive of the mission bay project and when presented they were interested in open space uses that will help support the tenants that will be residing there the developers and others have responder to the open space positively in the development next steps subsequent to our action the project is on schedule to close the schedule on may 18th with the construction starting shortly thereafter with a marketing plan in june and oak staff will approve that october of this year a month later the partnership begins the outreach section for the prospective applicants 588 mission boulevard the certificate of occupancy no more than the

on the media, it's one percent and 7.5 percent. so there's little that impacted the eelvaluations on the short time margretkets. by themselves the evaluations do not have an impact on the short term market. case in point and one example is 1997 you had a year that was deep into the economic ex skpangspangs and june it was up 14 and a half percent. there was a lot of volatility in the fall. so we expect more volumeatility in the fall. >> so basically the bottom line is according to history paul begin where we are now year-to-date in may, the market should go higher. >> yeah so what we have here today the market should go higher bassed on the returns. the fact that the evaluations or the june does not have an impact on the market at all. we have had a strong year going forward and objects in moisten tend to stay in motion. >> thank you. >>> the long time shot that a trader made that could be worth $21 million in a week. we will show you how up next. more fast money straight ahead. the pursuit of healthier. it begins from the second w