well in my thirty's never thank you thank you percival into. politics that's what many are saying out of the d.n.c. chair donna brazil claims bernie sanders was cheated in the primary but goes further the g.o.p. establishment didn't embrace trump then nor now. parties at war with themselves. u.s. air force claims that a missile that was launched the saudi arabia from yemen on saturday was made despite tehran's denials that it supplied any such hardware to rebels in yemen. cia whistleblower john kiriakou tells us how he was pulled from an e.u. parliament last minute just for being a sputnik radio host. and i thought ok well american politics rears its ugly head even in brussels. if you mix founder julian assange says that u.k. prosecutors have admitted deleting e-mail exchanges concerning his case. and german police authorities investigate.

let me answer the question another sort of slightly indirect way that relates to percival's discovery i understood from talking to michelle: and from some of the documents i found that they wanted to remove that and the other for a long time but they were not quite sure how to do it. right? the curator or anybody, the architect of the capitol, starts removing art around the building and taking it out, you kind of open up a can of worms, right? you don't do that. so under what were they removed? 1958 is when they begin the renovation. the east portico was rebuilt. everything had to be removed, you know, for the dismantling to and the new columns put up. so they were temporarily removed into storage and the smithsonian and then accidentally on purpose, somebody forgot to put them up there. that gives you insight into various aspects. of havingsort official reasons that was built but unofficially what that meant was that having hordes of people wandering freely through the building where it has always been. steps,k up the front through the rotunda and you just walk around and look at the

. >> percival, i will adjust the privilege of responding to jerry on one point.ersonally anything most people have no problem with the guidelines that the fcc had in place for many years that said a goal of having certain minimum amounts of news and public affairs programming for every station. although a station can demonstrate that it fit the public interest in other ways. i certainly have no problem with the 1991 children's television act which specifies there is a minimum amount of programming having to be carried to meet the informational needs of children. and i have not heard jerry or anybody else challenge the constitutionality or desirability of that statute and the fcc's enforcement of it. because as i said at the beginning, the airways belong to the public and we are entitled to extract public service. and that extends the so-called sidecar agreement. this was, a blatant evasion of the fcc's ownership rules through contractual arrangements that give all but actual ownership to one company while having a nominal owner in place. in fact in the securities