that is an example of work that is done with permission. the idea is that we will identify property owners who will offer their walls to the street smart program and allow us to link them up with urban artists and the youth team to create their works on those walls. the goal is to channel creative energy that is out there and to channel it into a permission- based urban arts program that will get recognition to the young people. that is a fundamental element of motivation for attackers -- taggers. the second element of our approach is the where art lives school curriculum. next september, a number of elementary schools will be implementing a new curriculum that is designed to reach students in grades 4 through 6. the schools will be selected in areas where there is a concentration of tagging. the lesson? accomplish the following educational outcomes in the interest of graffiti education and vandalism prevention. the students understand. they will understand through this curriculum the concept of public and personal space and the importance

creative program, and teaching our young people the difference between permission-based and vandalism. i think that this is part of, hopefully, the turning of the tide if we can more broadly implement these programs and begin to educate a younger generation on not getting involved in tagging in the first place. >> the elements we have brought an are the curriculum and then the school district and an outlet for -- brought in are the curriculum in the school district and an outlet for the expression. >> i will add a question. have you tried the complaint process? it seems to me the city should be able to support you. living on a limited income, you should not have to pay for all of that. can you help us out here? can you help this gentleman out? who can help this gentleman out? >> ed will help him out. that's a new, an additional sort of how do we figure out that part. i know you have. >> i have the final report on each case last year. and i have security cameras. and the neighbors have been involved. we even have captured evidence on camera but not one prosecution. not within convictio

i had to write for copyright permission for 48 of them under copyright protection. i started one year before it was the education for me practiced and the bureaucracy and greed and control or out to write lying and also the circumstances of leadership. i thought naively that to the many executors' would be happy to have forgotten some long forgotten poll that nobody had talked about in 40 years and i would say i will reprint this call the vintage book isn't that good? not one bit. they did not see this as an opportunity to find a new audiences there were two exceptions peter davis davis, whose wonderful story is in the book and fabulous story which recommend was happy to have his mother's work made available and exceptionally generous with his terms with overall copyright holders made it as hard as possible for me to anthologize and reprint the right jurors' work. permission editors blocked my letters intel prodded by their bosses for the aggrieved authors and miraculously they located the letters in a matter of minutes. at one press the permissions editor was quite

controller some nato gave permission for the mig 23 to take off? >> yes. >> reporter: what was the mission of the mig? what was it supposed to do in >> to shoot qaddafi forces there. >> reporter: the colonel says he fired 128 rounds and hit a fuel truck and two other vehicles carrying qaddafi's force, but nato disputes his account, telling cbs news it did not give the pilot permission to fly. it says an awacs plane detected the mig when it took off and called in two fighter planes, which forced the mig to return to base. nato is sensitive to criticism it is only enforcing the no-fly zone against qaddafi's forces. it claims this is the first interception it had to make. but it is difficult to reconcile this pilot's account with nato's version of events. allen pizzey, cbs news, behghazi. >> mitchell: just ahead on tonight's "cbs evening news," potholes aplenty on america's roads. do cities have what it takes to fix them? >> mitchell: along with the weather troubles we told you about earlier, the arrival of spring means the blooming of potholes across

to travel and we get permission to travel from the constitution we have permission for without a passport you can leave the country it's just that most other countries want exception well either they want to accept you and now we can't even go to canada or to mexico in the old days you could do that without your passport on them and we used to go back and forth a lot i used to book a new hampshire and we'd go across the border with no problems but now the bigger problem is coming back into your own country even if you are a citizen and so at some level it sort of restricts your ability to move by having these kind of restrictions but we'll go back and look at who really applies to i think theoretically replies to people who don't have any other ways of proving that you know where or where they were born and how they were born and we've got a lot of other problems with people and we've dealt with a lot of questions and e-mails from people who were delivered by midwives sure especially in texas and you know earlier as we were in rural areas and so on you were it with all the questions of im

the inquiry requested permission to. force prisoners to stand in stress position for up to four hours. in the margin rumsfeld himself scribbled i stand eight to ten hours a day why is standing limited to just four hours and was it like that when we went back after he was soft. and then down a bit of short pier and then came neither who really. sort of. started the harsher techniques. i believe had no difficulty with pushing from his own office to get more results and that was that was. the side this man wanted everybody to break. and believe that the only right that people do. was the right to give us intelligence that was the only correct word in the business of winning the global war on terror we also conduct ourselves as americans always did everything that goes on in camp delta is a representation of what we think makes america great. we decided to call up doctors again this time he was more cooperative. the shrink back you know i called you actually long time ago at a time you didn't want to. talk. i'm not at libert

in order to speak freely with us permission from the pentagon ok and did he. give you permission to participate with you be available for an interview and i would make myself available correct ok really good we would get by. former commander. talk about. this case so you can you basically did it to give interview i can't tell them what to look for he said it ok but it sounds like. we approve it in other words. we had by. the right do it. why does the pentagon want to silence marcus. who fired him and why. and who was it that took the interrogation methods from guantanamo cuba to another great thing and. maybe the answer can be found somewhere else. after the scandal not too great when the photos came out command of the prison camp was taken over by none other then general miller. miller was sent to a break to clean up the mess after the scandal. the person miller replaces is general janis karpinski many consider her to be responsible for what went on in the prison in iraq since she was the commanding officer at the time and it was her soldiers posing in the pi

i met with her doctors, her neurosurgeon and her doctors and they have given us permission to take her to the launch. >> and katie will be on the show in the next half hour with more on her interview with kelly and his twin brother scott. it's 12 minutes past the

they can aggressively remove permissions in the future for off-leash actions. it will be demanding the you fix this mess. i do not own a dog, but i will be impacted. and putting more people into the urban parts for off-leash recreations. more parking problems around off-leash areas, more use means more maintenance. more maintenance means more money. he proposed restrictions are not even the end of the squeeze play. when their stealth provision to limit off-leash areas in an unappealable unilateral decision, these are not being complied with dissatisfaction. the national park service can aggressively removed permissions in the future for off-leash dog areas to exist on their land. and what you think will be the result of this continuing strife? the public will be demanding that you fix this mess. i do not own a dog, but i will be impacted because of the increased use from all over the city looking to exercise their dogs. before the federal government is allowed to restrict, they must be made to declare what the impact will be on the city. please require a fair a

areas specifically -- 14 of 17 stations reported that they had been unable to obtain a permit for permission to access certain positions in a timely manner because of how long it takes to work with land

with the president's permission, days they have to complete this process. that takes away a huge hole in the procedures. secondly, we went on to tighten the -- we implemented -- the same timelines we have for ourselves. finish within 120 days. we have instituted the time limits on hearings so again, even though that person is often paid a good amount of money, they are expected to limit those hearings to an hour and a half per side even though they have leeway to give more. on the back end of the hearing, sometimes we wait -- it could take three to four months. these rules set a very tight timeline. 21 days. then a tight timeline for the parties to respond to that report. so i think with these rules in place if we follow them and the commissioners monitoring it, we're going to solve this problem entirely. but while we're in the process of making these changes, the last one i think was a response to commissioner kingsley or chan. that we'll provide if the president wishes to, he may invite the "outside the lines" hearing officer to -- outside hearings office

to the permission lies in the m.o.u. if in their judgments they execute operation -- or exigent circumstances or emergency pursued when they need. >> go back and read what happens. that request has to be approved by the lan manager. and if a land manager does not, then all is there to pay. this m.o.u. does not work because it is unfair. border patrol has to come to you and begged for permission. time after time after time, you are not granted the permission in your not doing it in a timely fashion. and when you do to it, then you ask for mitigated amounts of money which congress has no control. we do not know how much money you're getting from border control. we do not know how you are spending it. at one time we tried, you actually get a list of what you're getting and what you're spending if it was removed from the conferce committee report. there're so many problems down there, if it makes one's head span, especially with the rhetoric we're getting here today. i yield back to the chairman. >> mr. vitiello, according t

it is permissive fiscally, in terms of air defenses that do not a sense, it is permissive in terms of facing, it is permissive in terms about freedom of action within the aerospace, it is permissive within our use of the spectrum to send and receive sen dole's -- signals, and no one is trying to override our signals and that kind of an environment. i would be careful about extrapolating these platforms performing so well, and they really are, into an unknown future in which these permissivenesses may not exist. excuse me. thank you. they may not exist in the same way. the set pressure. . we need to be careful with their language because it might confuse our thinking. we refer to these isr platforms. when you are looking at the terms isr that it is a wonderful term, but it has been fairly corrupted. if you break it down into what intelligence is, and then surveillance and reconnaissance, these are surveillance platforms. is used well, they can create intelligence. they are not in and of themselves intelligence platforms. in fact, our language and our emphasis on them petreaus the parti

. >> i'm not sure -- >> i would say one word is permission. >> there was no permission granted by them. >> that's the only difference to me. >> just permission. cool. >> where's the microphone? there in the middle, the man standing up. >> a graffiti watch in hayes valley. despite going to the supervisor and the rest of you, there's a situation where there's a business, a dry cleaning business, laundry business. the front is on hayes street, the back is on the alley street, linden. used to have a white van. he parked on linden. now it's been hit about 15, 25 times. he's now moved it to the front on hayes street. i spend time cleaning up on hayes street and this van is sitting there overnight. it's a mobile object. and what can you do about it? does it have to have any legislative work done on that? >> i'm not sure on that. do we know if there is legislation on trucks or moving cars? >> it's a state code that we would need for motor vehicles. if you provide it to 311 and provide the license plate, d.p.w. will go out and find out who owns that vehicle and talk to the business owner of the

they gave four unnamed lawmakers permission to carry it under the dome. they revolted them friday to review the policy. >> he is authorized to grant that permission. we ought to have more minds involved in the ultimate policy. >> it is unclearr why they wanted pack heat in sacramento. they were only allowed to carry the gun from the capitol garage to their office not the floor. but the shooting of gabreille giffords in arizona brought the attention to the vulnerability of politician. >> should makers be denied the second amendment? >> i believe they shouldn't. i hope that the speaker will reconsider that. >> capitol visitors go through screening before entering the state capitol and the this month the sergeant at arms carried semiautomatic weapons to enhance safety given the large level of rhetoric on taxes and other proposals. armed chp officers guard the building. >> i don't believe i would ever need a weapon. the state senator received death threats but believes that the building security is adequate and a sergeant and arms is available for events outs

mediterranean and secondly we need to be very clear that those who come here are not all branded permission to be in easily or europe but we have the strictest definition of the conventional frontin negress ever possible so that we don't create any further incident but for these people to come to europe but encourage them to stay in their own countries well what you're saying sounds great in theory but when's it going to happen these people. you know as we speak daily. well the major problem we're facing right now is that we once again see the dramatic consequences of bad legislation from the european union we have let down the wall of control in among the countries which means that people who have a legal permission to stay in italy can actually practically move to any other european country and on the other hand we have very different takes system which work to protect our borders against illegal migration but it doesn't work because once again the european union's authorities fail in this matter so what we need to do is that we need to strengthen the front six system so that it actually

it is permissive in terms of basing and it is permissive in terms of the freedom of action within the air space. it's permissive within our use of the spectrum to send and receive signals and its permissive in terms of no one else trying to override our signals in that kind of environment so it be careful but extrapolating these platforms performing so well and they really are into an unknown future in which the permissiveness not exist in the same way. the second point, we need to be careful with our language because it might confuse our thinking. i, we refuse to these as isr platforms. when you look at the term isr it is a fairly wonderful term but it's been corrupted. if you break it down into what intelligence is and i think i know that and then surveillance from the reconnaissance these are surveillance platforms. if used well they can create intelligence, but they are not in and of themselves intelligence platforms. and in fact, our language and emphasis on them betrays particularly american trade. when it comes to intelligence, we generally apply an uneven emphasis on the techn

radioactive iodine there is 10,000 times the permissible limit. here's david wright. >> reporter: today, more bad news from the reactor. radiation levels rose dramatically. rad radioactive iodine is now at 10,000 times the permissible limit. radioactive cesi mu, 5um, 500 t. it lingers for hundreds of years. this sign says off-limits, but there's not anybody here to object. 20 clom terms outside the plant, the radiation levels are too high for check points manned. so the crew drives on past. everyone was ordered to evacuate three weeks ago. they left in a hurry. trains just stopped dead on the tracks. family pelts left behind are eager for their masters to come home. at a bus stop, the poster for a political campaign. it says "the countryside is the place of new beginnings." the candidate and the voters are gone. just 12 miles away, hundreds of workers are still struggling valiantly to tame the reactors. and the pressure is taking its toll. in e-mail messages published, several of them explained that the reactor is just one of their worries. "there

you don't have to have permission. he searched the vehicle, there was a black gym bag on the floor in front of the passenger seat. inside there was a tech nine machine gun, a very nasty-looking gun with an air cooler on the barrel. the man was busted. so i said to the sergeant later, i said, now, just -- i want to understand this. he didn't have to stop when you spoke to him. no, he didn't. and he didn't have to go back to his vehicle, right? >> no, he didn't. and he certainly didn't have to unlock the door and open it. no, that's right, he could have done better, said the sergeant. [laughter] people do not know their rights, especially under the fourth amendment. under boost monte, a supreme court decision in which thurgood marshall strenuously dissented, there is no obligation to advise people of their right to refuse to be searched as there is an obligation in the miranda case to advise people of their right to refuse to answer questions. therefore, people, you know, say, okay, all the time, and a lot of people i as

i see one or two i mean like monsanto in other countries wheat rice flax out how thought and no permission was given. and it can aged people and the farmers and the continuum are said we have seen the damage it has done to health environment more chemicals the poor crops we do not want any more new g.m.o. . i've heard not only in your country but also in my country and united states scientists say that some government people say we must be part of this new technology. this new technology is crazy science it's unsafe science and it's not proven science. and if we've had in north america eleven twelve years of game modes how come we don't have lots of food at the dock hungry world. of corporations want total total control of the seed supply which will then give them overall control of the food supply that's what you most are all about not more. hungry world but control of the seed supply. lindland. the russian republic blends historic diversity with economic diversification oil drilling industry pushes for tomorrow's petrochemical products traditionally the issues the focus is on the pilot d

to the permission lies in the m.o.u. if in their judgments they execute operation -- or exigent circumstances or emergency pursued when they need. >> go back and read what happens. that request has to be approved by the lan manager. and if a land manager does not, then all is there to pay. this m.o.u. does not work because it is unfair. border patrol has to come to you and begged for permission. time after time after time, you are not granted the permission in your not doing it in a timely fashion. and when you do to it, then you ask for mitigated amounts of money which congress has no control. we do not know how much money you're getting from border control. we do not know how you are spending it. at one time we tried, you actually get a list of what you're getting and what you're spending if it was removed from the conference committee report. there're so many problems down there, if it makes one's head span, especially with the rhetoric we're getting here today. i yield back to the chairman. >> mr. vitiello, according

and no permission was given. and it can aged people and the farmers and the continuum are said we have seen the damage it has done to health the environment more chemicals what the poor props we do not want any more new modes the i've heard not only in your country but also in my country and the united states scientists say and some government people say we must be part of this new technology. this new technology is crazy science it's unsafe science and it's not proven science. and if we've had in north america eleven twelve years of game modes how come we don't have lots of food now that the done hungry world. of worker ration is one total total control of the seed supply which will then give them total control of the political party that's what do you most are all about and not more who feed a hungry world control of the seeds of power. live in a country that don't understand that there's more violence in the streets of this country than there are in the streets in afghanistan or baghdad. one night in the sprin

the charges and within the first days of the calendar, the chief would be here and say with your permission, i need 60 days. i think a good number of cases very early on could be disposed of very early on. miss porter has come one a draft. i think if we put that piece into place, i think we dramatically cut down the number of cases. >> great, thank you, commissioner hammer. your work on this has been unbelievable. the interim rules we put together. the new rules. the accommodation of rules. i have to tell you it has helped the process and you get all the credit for this. and again, you spent a lot of time and a lot of thought went into it. you met with the necessary parties. the good news is that we want to make clear to you, chief suhr, that we sat here where your lawyers came to us and said this is a termination case. we can find a middle ground. these recommendations that we have been trying do, thank god for chief suhr who has taken control of this and we're getting fewer cases with the police department, the chief is exercising his position in giving 10 days. in my opinion, it is no go

see one hundred two i mean like monsanto another company's wheat rice flax out thousand and no permission was given. and it can aged people and the farmers and the current to me are said we have seen the damage it has done to health environment more chemicals the park rocks we do not want any more new homes. the i've heard not only in your country but also in my country and united states scientists say and some government people say we must be part of this new cake knology. this new technology is crazy science it's unsafe science and it's not proven science. and if we've had in north america eleven years of g.m.o. so how come we don't have lots of food now that the gun hungry world. the corporations want total total control of the seed supply which will then give them total control of the pollute the park that's what you most are all about not more food peter hungry world control of the seeds of. to live in a country the gun understand that there's more violence in the streets of this country than there are in the streets in afghanistan or baghdad. this spring become a brace of. as it. is

can go in your fields they can get your tax records your programming records with or without your permission and if a parm or commit some violations of the contract might sound or can take all its profit or monsanto can make and destroy its crop and parmer is not allowed to say anything to anybody about it. no the multinationals with these contracts are exercising more power than any government would ever dare to do months saddle in your two thousand and three contracts have another cause added which states that a farmer can no longer sue once handle or take months out of court or lay a lawsuit against monsanto no matter for what reason it could be whether it's perceived or poor crops they no longer consume or saddle more sound repeats their rates are way our farm even taken months hundreds of courts so all their freedom of speech expression is taken away total domination and controlled by a multinational over a plumber has light stamping a primary into her into the ground he has no longer any rights where and that's basically what the judge ruled in my case against montana's he's against me

minors have to get permission from their parents to do it.te senator ted lou says the study shows bed cause cancer and the law doesn't allow kids to buy cigarettes or liquor. critics say the government should stay out of it. >>> walking a mile in someone else's shoes. that's what a couple hundred of men did in high heels. not drag queens in this camp but as linda yee shows us to make money for the rape crisis center. >> i would like to think that i have phenomenal taste in women's high heels. >> reporter: size 10 feet squeezed into delicate heels. >> the balls of my feet are killing me and i haven't even started walking yet. >> reporter: it is not a pretty sight. but then neither is the problem these men want to highlight. violence against women. this is the ninth annual men's march to benefit the san jose ywca program to stop rape, sexual assaults and gender violence. it is really important for us to be out here and show that there are men out there who care about this stuff. >> reporter: so they walk a mile in her shoes. a symbolic if not p

but that said, it's very difficult to get permission from the male relatives to photograph. >> without that permission they won't do it. >> no. >> and if you do try and do it you can actually get the woman killed because if her male relatives see that she has been photographed without their permission, she can get killed by the family. >> the next one is a youn young-- 11-year-old who set herself on fire. >> it is a big problem in afghanistan. a lot of young women, generally they're married women. even if they are married at about 13, 14, they set themselves on fire because you can't get divorced in afghanistan very easily. if you want to leave your husband or if you want to escape an abusive home, there is no escape, really. there are very few shelters. there are a few but very few place you can go. so a lot of women burn themselves and set themselves on fire. and this young girl is only 11 years old. and she had learned about it. she said that she did it because she dreamed that a woman had told her to do it. but later i found out that she had been abused by her parents. and she set

we got their permission a few years ago as we were expanding the food waste compost program to utilize that building to transload organic materials and to transfer trucks to take it to our compost sites. that has been a real issue for us. because now, they are talking about taxing us -- a significant tax. we have a problem with that. we expect they are entitled to something for having our facilities there. we think the amount they are asking for is a little exorbitant for the impact that we have. i have instructed our management team at that location to figure out how we are going to handle that material in a portion of the transfer station so we can get it out of brisbane and the nexus for the tax is not there. yes, we have been talking to them for years about the need to expand our facility. a couple of years ago, your board of supervisors adopted a mandatory composting and mandatory recycling ordinance. they have been extremely effective in allowing the amount of material that is collected for recycling for composting to be increased rather substantially. we also now have the challe

the reason is when we got the permission to use pier 96 for the purpose of recycling our traditional recyclables -- paper, bottles, cans -- we committed to the citizens of the bayview that this was going to be recycling only. we told them, we committed that we would not bring garbage into the bayview district. that was important to them an important to us. our facility, pier 96 sits right below the hunters point housing project. while we did not have to do it, we committed and have been voluntarily for the last -- i guess it has been eight or nine years now that pier 96 has been there and processing the city's recyclables -- we voluntarily offered, long before anybody was talking about local hire ordinances in the city -- we voluntarily offered all new jobs to people who live in two zip codes that are impacted in the bayview, and we have hired somewhere around 175 people who come from that zip code -- those two zip codes to work for us. what we heard a week or two ago from the port that was of real interest to us was the possibility of using peer 84 long-term replacement facilities.