and prishvin writes in his diary about this commissioner that persyuk is drunk in his hands kept ourconclusion, which he, as it were, came at the cost of his own life experience, and that’s all. this was reflected in his prose then. he also wrote such a highly social artistic rose. and then he wrote this very story, which i already called the worldly cup. and i tried to publish this story; the civil war had already ended. the nep began, publishing life revived, and they came to me and ran into soviet censorship, which was very strict. then what is printed with us when taught pelnik, a wonderful soviet writer, with whom they came not only to be friends, but at least to support him. such friendly relations are like pelnyak upon request. prishvina conveyed this story to trotsky, namely lev davydovich trotsky, it was he who was then responsible for soviet ideology, for soviet culture, and in general for this soviet agenda. trotsky read and made the following verdict: i recognize the story’s artistic merits, but it is entirely counter-revolutionary and counter-relational. and when prishvi