heard many of us didn't understand the notice we could comment on other seconds of the eir as and pertain to the alternative section. in the interest of fairness and due process a grant of a continuance would be appropriate. this is much too important a document the issues are far too critical to the future of san francisco. as well as to present and future residents of san francisco to ram this process through without giving everyone in the city a change to comment. please grant us a continuance. thank you >> thank you. >> good afternoon, commissioners. i'm john this hearing is a hearing that is called to comply with a court order. it was appreciated if in non-compliance complying with the court order through would have an a constructive notice the notice was sent out december during the holiday for the public to review and to come here on the 23rd of january for the organizations of time of of the city to develop and study the documents and make appropriate comment to the eir and materials that have been recirculated but worse than that the notice was - it said the hearing will be limit

and also would like to speak on one more reason why there is such a cycle of homelessness pertaining to people have drug addiction problem. i recently found out that there's a proposal by an individual who happens to be a black man who wants to pass out crack pipes. subject to that on the ground that's keeping people in the recycle loop when the truth of the matter is you need educational system to let them know that smoking cocaine deteriorates your brain and your cerebellum, the main part of your brain that causes you to remember instead of encouraging them to come get crack pipes -- >> thank you, sir. i appreciate it. thank you. next speaker, please. >>> hello, supervisors. brian basinger, director of the aids housing alliance. thank you for taking the time to hold this hearing. i'd like to encourage you to also think about reframing the angle about how we look at services in san francisco. we can look at services also as a job creator. i know that people with hiv and aids bring down more federal and state money in san francisco than we consume in resources. and, so, economics, it

historic preservation commission under charter under the referral of duties in which the matter that pertain to the historic resources and in effects to those resources must be circulated and i find such a statement is contained in the collective summary that the eir could result in a potentially impact to resource etc. so my contention is you need to a circulate this through the historic preservation commission at some point. and, secondly, there's been allocation this the notice for this has been inadequate that's a legal issue without going through a long protracted discussion between attorneys i can only accept what is before us as being adequate. i am open, however, to extending the comment period not this particular hearing but a comment hearing it's for another three weeks. i don't know how the other commissioners will feel we can get to that in a motion if there is some agreement >> commissioner moore. >> i believe that all argument which for further clarification have been brought forward respectfully and without having all the sections of the document in front of me to which the co

rerequest that you grant us the estimation e extension of time necessarily to review the pages that pertain to the eir. there's very much a need for they're to be single-family residents. and we need to keep the rh one in place. there's been a lot of discussion about the lack of transportation or the muni transportation not being up to par which i don't need to get into it spaets and if you grant united states t the extension it will be greatly appreciated >> thank you. >> thank you. >> good afternoon carolyn st. francis association. san francisco. i also support of the continuance. i did not understand until a couple of days ago we could comment on the counterpart sections and i need more time. policy 1.6 should sad add a reference such as a is it fair to say wood so single-family homes could be maintained in san francisco. we just celebrated our citizen technology in 2012 as a single-family neighborhood in san francisco and those are the types of neighborhood that should be encouraged in san francisco. muni is unequal able to serve our population during the rush hour. normally 20 minutes

pertaining to the story, pertaining to what i know to get at some type of truth that i feel is the certain of the guy's engine, if that makes any sense at all, it is kind of like getting at something that hopefully will be something that kind of catapults whoever you are playing into action, and it is a hard thing to do, and sometimes you don't find it. but yo you are in constant sear. >> do you put the process on paper or a mental exercise. >> no it is very mental, it is work. it is problem solving. it is a lot of things. >> rose: looking back at the super bowl, and the life of philip seymour hoffman when we continue. funding for charlie rose is provided by the following. >> captioning sponsored by rose communications from our studios in new york city, this is charlie rose. didn't change anything for this game and didn't make up any new calls and change any defenses or precious or anything, we put our guys in situation to play they were comfortable with and they did and learned how they were playing and we got a great play out of everybody. >> rose: the seattle seahawks gave a crushing vi

that's the funding that we have that pertains to reaching the public with what's happening at city hall terms of the attorneys and our official attorneys but we don't have fund in our department for other kinds of outreach at this time >> so where could the expenses of what sfgovtv does if that's within their budget to broadcast us and to have on the website the extremely that the boardometers and the archiving. >> i believe my deputy has informed we with have a work order with sfgovtv at the 9 thousand plus and the work order with sfgovtv to perform our video services. >> thank you. you're welcome >> any further questions. >> thank you very much. we'll open this up for public comment. anyone wishes to comment seeing none, public comment is closed. i appreciate you're coming by madam clerk. can i have a motion to table - to file item 6 we can without objection >> madam clerk, is there any other business before us. >> no mr. chair. >> no mr. chair. >> thanks everyone we are so you can't save money? it's easy as pie! brown bag your lunch instead of going out. six dollars saved timed 5 day

china is the key player, once again, as it pertains to north korea. at some point you have to wonder whether the alliance can hold. as you go through this, it's horrific. it's murder, rape, torture, slavery, and specific examples of a woman made it drown her own baby. people imprisoned and tortured for watching a soap opera. children in prison and starved from birth. in the light of all that. do you think this will change anything? >> north korea has not followed international norms. they are unpredictable. possibly. kim jong un, the new leader sees this and undoubtedly he has to read it. perhaps there's going to be internal forces in north korea, moderate forces in the military, in the political structure saying we are not going get assistance to the starving people, unless there's changes. that is a limited but possible course that might change things. i wouldn't count on it, but now the best answer is some kind of engagement with kim jong un on this report, on the nuclear weapons reduction, on engaging with south korea. on rekindling the 6-party ta

>> well the supreme court has ruled before on situations pertaining to the epa and their overreach whencops to certain laws that are put in place but specifically when it comes to the epa trying to ache private property away from people in the name of protecting the environment. i think that when it comes to clean, the clean water situation i think the epa or the supreme court will probably look at that in a similar fashion. i would hope overall that their decision kind of bleeds into looking more of what president obama has done with his executive orders as we've seen with specific laws. i mean deciding not to enforce certain things, only because they don't agree with them, not just they have been struck down by congress or changed. obamacare is obviously the biggest example of that. it will be interesting to see what arguments are made, especially from the obama side of the court, to say what about that. >> appropriate delegation of authority by the congress to create epa. frankly the epa is doing a lot of good things to rye to put that in -- lou: created by richard nixon. >> that's c

>> well the supreme cou has ruled before on situations pertaining tthe epa and their overreach when itthat are put in place but specificallwhen it comes to the epa trying to ache private property away from people in the name of protecting the environment. i think that when it comes to clean, the clean water situation i think the epa or the supreme court will probably look at that in a similar fashion. i would hope overall that their decision kind of bleeds into looking more of what president obama has done with his executive orders as we've seen with specific laws. i mean deciding not to enforce certain things, only because they d't agree with them, not just they have been suck down by congress or changed. obamacare is obviously the biggest example of that. it will be interesti to see what arguments are made, especially from the obama side of the court, to say what about that. >> appropriate delegation of authority byhe congresto create epa. frankly the epa is doing a lot of good things to rye to put that in -- lou: created by richarnixon. >> that's correct. and the original father was

[inaudible] it is a request of a study so i think anything pertaining to our ballot measure should go to the rules committee. again, i think we are repeting ourselves and understand supervisor wieners concerns as well. i thipg we should just talk a vote on the motion >> supervisor co00 >> i wanted to reiterate, supervisor ye agreed to hear the item on march fwent and that is reasonable time for us to deal with. when you-it is a reasonable amount of time. supervisor kim acknowledged there could be a opportunity for a special committee meeting which is a additional meeting to handle the rules xhilty agenda. supervisor wiener, i understand the concerns of the board and the desire to see it sent tothe rules committee because that is the established pat squrn the process and we are a process driven body. part of your concerns that you just articulated are because you are afraid people will ubinstruct the process and we have seen it happen before, but i am confident in supervisor yes ability to move something through the committee so with that said i will withdrawal my motion off the floor.

. >> public comment, on all matters pertaining to item 8 below, closed session and including public comment on vote, whether to hold item 8 no closed session. >> a public comment regarding our closed session? litigations related matters and disciplinary related matters that are confidential and protected by the police officers bill of rights and the california supreme court? >> hearing none, public comment is closed. >> do i have a motion? >> i move that we go into closed session. >> second. >> all this favor, aye. >> thank you very much, ladies >> we are back, do i have a motion in >> to not disclose. >> do i have a second. >> second. >> all if favor. >> aye. >> before we call the last line item, which is the adjournment, as i stated earlier in the agenda tonight, we are adjourning in the memory and the honor of sergeant michael j. hutchins san francisco police department who lost his battle to cancer. who left and leaves behind his wife, his three children, his father, and part of the police family and his sister. and so, he was a great officer, and that is the third officer that we have

invited leonard dana from the 12-13th district audit to give you the board, a short presentation pertaining to the sfusd 12/13 audit. in addition, mr. dana is able to answer any questions after his presentation. also present is the manager on the audit. nathan middleman. mr. dana? speaker: thank you for accommodating us. i have another time commitment item tonight. i won't take much of your time. but just to let you know we have completed the audit and submitted the audit to the state. just to let you know that all of the opinions are unqualified meaning they change the wording this year. now they are called unmodified opinions which means it's a clean opinion. everything is fairly stated and that goes for the financial statements, state compliance and federal compliance as well. we did not make any audit adjustments during the year or during the audit as well. that means the audits going forward are for the district which is obviously a very important item. i did want to let you know nathan here has been on-the-job for 5 years. he's kind of a fix you are around the district office and he b

it's the hub of the camp during any given camp week and consequentially it has to be in pertaining prettyer several years the turf has declined in spots and noted more attendance are attention. the fire fighting effort on the rim fire may have broken some of the lines of the irrigation it will help repair the irrigation rates and replace the turf areas and complete t the areas to the 2014 camp season. that's our proposed allocation for the money we're requesting from you today and within the open space fund there's a fund balance of $14,621 within the commissioners reserve. you can see told them a for the sub fund and if approved the department will help with the enhancement program that starts saturday february 1st we are asking as requested by two commissioners >> before we give it back to commissioner mcdonnell and commissioner bonilla to review and debate. i want to augment a couple of things about this first, i want to express my pronounced gratitude to commissioner bonilla and 1k34kd to we're rebounding from an off-season we almost lost of the camp to a celebration of the camps 90th

indeed i would say we're looking at the legislation as it pertains to gender and zip code there's a phenomenal i not for screen 4 negligent employers will only hire people of one negligent group so they're in the underground economy. we're hoping this legislation that supervisor weiner is sponsoring will put an end to something that is unfair to the vast majority of parking operators playing by the rules >> thank you very much any other members of the public who want to make comment. seeing none, public comment is closed. commissioner dwight >> so for the operator that are let's call them instruck up lose what prevents them from lying on it does not. how do you go about enforcing this some that number that didn't raise a red flag >> any regulatory regime that i can list a hundred of them in san francisco including taxes people can also try to cheated

justin sullivan had a warrant in existence for his arrest, wholly unrelated to any of the matters pertainingo this case. in an attempt to evade that, he gave his brother's name. our curiosity was piqued to the point that we thought perhaps justin sullivan was using henry's identification, and it could have conceivably been that justin dropped the i.d. card at the scene of the crime. >> but like his brother, justin denied any involvement in the murders. he said he had an alibi, that he was with friends at a nightclub, which they corroborated. then investigators asked their third suspect, william deparvine, for a dna sample. he said no. >> we don't have any probable cause at this point in time in the investigation to indicate that mr. deparvine is involved in the murder. therefore, we don't have enough information to draw a search warrant. >> without a warrant, police couldn't get a genetic sample directly from deparvine. but there were other ways. >> we were looking for him to either eat something, drink something and discard it, chew gum and discard it, or even spit so that we could swab tha

clarified that the comments maybe made as to the revisions and those reference sections as they proton - pertain to the alternatives. today, the secretary and the staff repeated the incorrect reductions the writ issued by the court said you must consider all comments as to revisions to the eir and consider all comments to the revisions. so your notice it inadequate and you must recirculate. the court held that you must see that the eir discussions was not inclusionary you have the opportunity to recommend to the board the policies that will be better. we'll submit written comments but essential you should eliminate the sees to instead of the income target for the period. the pipeline units anticipated are 25 thousand more and more - >> thank you, madam your time is up. >> i'd like to continue. >> you can submit our comments in writing. thank you >> my name is a steven white. on beaumont avenue. i support the continuance. i'm worried about major changes in the quality of our neighborhood. and also worried about transportation issues. thank you >> thank you. >> may i have the overhead, please. oka

i am using special money from the legislature to enforce these laws that pertain to illegal immigrationther crimes. >> sheriff joe we have our community comment on that . . . >> well, where is the brutality? i have a monitor that has done monitoring in detroit, and oakland that had to do to brutality. there is no brutality in my office by my deputies. it's strictly how we stop people on the streets in traffic violations. >> sheriff joe we have got about 30 seconds left. you are well-known for a lot of things. what does the sheriff joe arpaio legacy look like? >> i don't care about legacies. i'm doing my job, and when i leave office i can look in the mirror and say i did it my way. i don't plan on leaving for all of those activists out there for many, many, many more years. >> all right. thanks sheriff, thanks to our community. until next time, we'll see you online. ♪ >>> good evening, everyone, welcome to al jazeera america. i'm john siegenthaler in new york. lethal force, the u.s. debates whether to launch a drone attack against an american. >>> escape how hundreds of syrians were able

[inaudible] it is a request of a study so i think anything pertaining

people and how does it pertain to today. it does.f she's running in 2016, it will apply to that. but, you know, bill clinton also went on these revenge cycles in 2010 and 2012 where he actually took out people who didn't support his wife. so i think that this all comes forward in time. >> and both of you, amy, are convinced that there is no question that she hasn't stopped running for president? she has every intention of running in 2016? >> oh, sure. this train is rolling and gaining steam for sure. all of these outside groups have formed around her, she is fundraising, already happening, red for hillary is there. all she needs to do really is decide that she is running and the whole landscape is there for us. now, one thing, jonathan, that the book gives her credit for, talking again about diplomacy is restoring the image around -- of america around the world after the bush years and you certainly bring up some of the positive things that bob gates and general petraeus had to say about her. given everything that's happened since yo

>> there's some big questions here, richard, and really what this pertains to from a federal standpoint, a congressional standpoint, is there will out of this massive data breach that happened back in december be some sort of uniformed federal standard for companies and banks to notify their consumers, pretty much all of us in this country, whether or not there was some sort of fraud regarding purchases they make at big retail shop and what not. what this sets up from a congressional perspective, as in washington, everything becomes political. you have lobbying groups from retailers saying no. banks have to do more, banks need a chip in their credit card. they can't just have a magnetic strip. retailers are pushing back saying, no, no, no, they want the banks to have those cards. banks are saying every single time there's a data breach, we're the ones that know about it and the retailers do not. you're going to see them fight this out to try and get a better uniform federal standard that pertains better to their industry, but i would be shocked after this happened because it's such a gr

would submit that for this sort of behavior to continue out there, is also bad public policy as it pertains to the transit first policy, and if you are going to come to san francisco in a single passenger vehicle, and that should be your premium mode of transportation. and i was also put eye spot light on this that as you are driving by and when you see rates that are so, low, in the 7 and 10 range and so on, something is going on in those garages and we are hoping that this legislation will put a spot light on that, thank you. >> thank you, sir. >> next speaker? >> good morning supervisors my name is david rodriguez and i am a business representative for teamsters and one of my job duties is to visit some of the parking garages in san francisco to follow up with some of the members who have grievances or questions or concerns and while i am doing the routes, and literally across the street or sometimes next door which are non-union operators and i would say that more than half are spanish speaking which is my first language and so i will have a conversation with them and they will ask me,

here is a resolution subsection to define what those were and defining that all of those sections pertain to information that is at the sheriff's office. i would like to thank all the fingerprint technicians and laughed law enforcement agency. >> this resolution was passed in 2010, perhaps 2011 and that was when community first slipped none san francisco. it was against our wishes. no one wanted. sheriff was a really out spoken national leader opposed fingerprint sharing for background checks. that's why we had this resolution. this commission canvas one -- was one of the 1st first to ask for an audit. now we don't respond to any ice and there has been a lot of sufficient for that. i'm going to recommend that we reduce the number of things that we ask for in our resolution since we've accomplished a lot in this city and i know it takes a lot of resource and a lot of mr. bruzo's time to do this. we were in the first to collect data but now ice is collecting a lot of data so there is other sources for data and it's very complicated to level 1, 2 and 3 and our data is different from theirs a

the work you have done pertains to the dna which is a very small amount found on the knife in question. >> yes. and that's been examined a number of times now. what happened originally, they arrested amanda knox and raffaele sollecito four days after the crime. they collected evidence but never analyzed it. when they analyzed the evidence both dna, it wasn't raffaele, it wasn't amanda. it was rudy guede. this isn't a third person, this is a completely separate actor according to the defense and i think the record shows that. but in any case, rudy guede asks for a speedy trial and is convicted. why the prosecution continued with its two initial suspects when all of the dna is rudy guede's in that room, all of the dna that is found the day of the murder is the he's on her body, in her vagina. if this case had been worked properly, look at the data, look at the evidence, amanda knox and raffaele sollecito were never charged. they were charged based on a gut feeling before the evidence was processed. once the evidence was processed, scientifically it pointed to one person who was tried and

i really look at it pertaining to the story.f you want to get the story, if you want to get close to somebody, if you want to find out what is really the truth on what is interesting, you have to create a trust between the journalist and the subject, i trust that is deep and profound, , thatally in this case ultimately you are going to send out. you are going to take their lives and send it out for possibly their benefit -- your benefit and maybe not theirs. i think there is a betrayal that happens. happens something that that i think it's something that might be a certain faustian type of thing. are goinge that you to pay a price. is there a price to be paid for this type of relationship? i find that fascinating. i think for capote he paid a huge price for that relationship and possibly today journalist's could identify. had thead he not relationship he couldn't have gotten the story. >> we wouldn't have had this great book if he didn't do what he did, but ultimately if you look into the story or watch the film or read about it

the first item is public comment, and this is for any items that are not on the agenda but do pertaino the business of the entertainment commission, is there anyone here that would like to make public comment? >> seeing none, public comment is closed. and let's move on to item two and approval of the minutes from january 21st. >> do you have any changes or motions? >> move to approve. >> second. >> this is a motion and a second. >> we can take public comment on this? >> is there any public comment on our minutes from our last meeting? i don't see any, so that is now closed. let's move on to voting. >> voting, sorry. >> commissioner hyde? >> aye. >> commissioner joseph? >> aye. >> commissioner lee? >> aye. >> commissioner campagnoli. >> aye. >> president tan? >> aye. >> all right. now on to item three, which is the report from executive director. >> good evening, as you can see there is nothing in your packet. i was on vacation last week. and so there is only really very view things to report. one is to reiterate that march 29th is our retreat. it will be 9 a.m. to about 1:00 and i hav

questions that the judge was entertaining this morning from the jurors, and his answers to them as they pertainefense. and looking for real clarity, at least according to the jurors, on the use of deadly force, and whether it is justified or if they were to find that it was not justified against one person, would that mean it would apply to everybody that was part of that vehicle in that suv. what do you interpret from these questions? i know earlier you said, you really don't want to try to read the tea leaves and know what's going through the minds of the jurors, but as you try to extrapolate these questions, what -- you know what do you think as a defense attorney, and as well as a former prosecutor? >> well, there are actually, fredricka, they're very sophisticated questions, because the charges in the case basically are against dunn for having shot and killed jordan davis. that's the first-degree murder charge, but there are charges against the three other kids who were in the suv as well. attempted murder charges involving them. so the jury is saying, well, you know, if he used appropriat