i have spoken to this board in 2007 extensively, when supervisor peskin was reviewing this issue. it has functioned in the city since 1996, when we had the first accessory year use. we think discretionary review is not a good idea. if you continue the matter, we encourage you to continue it no more than two or three weeks. we think a clock problem would occur at the end of october. my name is paul albretton, outside counsel for t mobile. we are unfamiliar with this request. we heard about it in the last half hour. president miguel: just laid it on the rail, thank you. is there any other -- yes. >> my name is joe panesha. i am also a representative of the project sponsor, t mobile. the projects were deemed to be complete early july. they have or even continued once. there is another request for a continuance. we respectfully ask that in fairness and the spirit of due process that we try to hear these items as soon as possible. we feel there has been ample opportunity to have these discussions, whether they be between us and telegraph hill dwellers, a meeting on june 30, or whether