leaders the rest i will submit spews thank you supervisor peskin. >> thank you supervisor peskin.pervisor mar views thank you so much supervisor peskin for speaking about tom hayden. i will just say we would do him to teach a course at new college law school when i was there. what an amazing history support her on statement was drafted by hayden and i think why to bother sts leaders at that failure i was born but it had an impact on the student movements and to student nonviolent court in committee and the student rights movement i think the patient that came out of the port runs invisibly i think about everyday. the biggest visionary approach from radical and revolutionary politics into electoral arena something that's really important get lots of lessons she taught us and what an amazing figure that impacted the youth movements of the 60s to civil rights and even how we look at it looked oral politics today. i will miss him greatly and do want to express thanks to supervisor peskin for raising his name in the backseat had on our city and our country and world. >> thank you super

a great question commissioner peskin. and these are, they are temporary in nature, and these are maximum budget amount of 500,000 all the way through the end of 2018. and we are currently right now, working with the state of california, in the area of the toll authority to go ahead and institute some additional improvements in the area that frankly would put us in a position to send a lot less than 500,000, and so we are managing that accordingly with all of the stake holders. >> i might submit to you colleagues, that maybe when we have a smaller not-to-exceed amount, and i mean that i don't want to say not-to-exceed half a million, when it should be not-to-exceed 200,000 or 300,000. why don't we wait until they narrow that amount down. and appropriate ate what needs to actually be appropriate ated. >> i am sorry, could you -- i don't think that i understand what you are suggesting. >> the operations and maintenance of the vita point include security. as well as just over all maintenance, and garage pick up as well as the

cohen and supervisor peskin. san francisco issuers staggering number of approximate 40,000 student beds that this is just truly remarkable. these 40,000 students compete with everyone else is looking for housing which makes housing more expensive for everyone. if you years ago supervisor generator offered legislation to identify new student housing while making it abundantly clear it's illegal to convert existing general population housing to student housing in san francisco. student housing as it is today is generally exempt from inclusion rate requirements so long as that housing remains a student housing. hence existing law requires that any point housing entitled the student housing later decides to convert to general population housing at that point the project is required to meet all of its inclusionary requirements, plus intricate today ordinance in no way alters this requirements. student housing to be provided in two ways. the educational institution itself can build housing for its own students or, when

. >> good morning chair farrell and members of the board i see that supervisor peskin just came in i don't sure. >> okay. we thanks ms. hayward joined by supervisor peskin the sponsor i'm going to turn it over to him for comments. >> thank you, mr. chair is a change to the administrative code which would change the number of self-appropriate funds that in this year's budget total cost one and $75 million and these are self-appropriately category 8 funds the proposal before us to change them into category 4 where they'll not self-appropriate but appropriate by the board of supervisors specifically this would apply to the inclusionary housing program which in the 2016-2017 budget is about one and $13 million jobs housing and linkage in the current budget is 43 and a half million dollars, the expedited condominium conversion market octavia at approximately $5 million and eastern neighborhoods at $3.3 million and the 97 prop a housing bond repayments 20 but one and $75 million as a matter of policy this board should take back the power of the appropriation as to the use of those fund and

. >> good morning chair farrell and members of the board i see that supervisor peskin just came in i don't sure. >> okay. we thanks ms. hayward joined by supervisor peskin the sponsor i'm going to turn it over to him for comments. >> thank you, mr. chair is a change to the administrative code which would change the number of self-appropriate funds that in this year's budget total cost one and $75 million and these are self-appropriately category 8 funds the proposal before us to change them into category 4 where they'll not self-appropriate but appropriate by the board of supervisors specifically this would apply to the inclusionary housing program which in the 2016-2017 budget is about one and $13 million jobs housing and linkage in the current budget is 43 and a half million dollars, the expedited condominium conversion market octavia at approximately $5 million and eastern neighborhoods at $3.3 million and the 97 prop a housing bond repayments 20 but one and $75 million as a matter of policy this board should take back the power of the appropriation as to the use of those fund and

supervisor campos supervisor cowen supervisor farrell supervisor kim not present supervisor mar supervisor peskin supervisor tang supervisor wiener supervisor yee madam president kw0u789 thank you ladies and gentlemen, can you please join us in the pledges and to the republic for which it stands, one nation under god, indivisible, with liberty and justice for all. >> madam clerk any communications. >> i have none to report madam president colleagues, any changes to the october 17th special board meeting and the october 18th regular board meeting minutes seeing none, a motion to approve those minutes motion by supervisor avalos and seconded by economy supervisor farrell colleagues without objection, without objection those meeting minutes will be passed after public comment. >> madam clerk read the consent calendar. >> items 1 through 6 are route. >> roll call vote. >> on items 1 through 6. >> supervisor mar supervisor peskin supervisor tang supervisor wiener supervisor yee supervisor avalos supervisor breed supervisor campos supervisor cowen supervisor farrell supervisor kim there are 11 i's. >>

a great question commissioner peskin. and these are, they are temporary in nature, and these are maximum budget amount of 500,000 all the way through the end of 2018. and we are currently right now, working with the state of california, in the area of the toll authority to go ahead and institute some additional improvements in the area that frankly would put us in a position to send a lot less than 500,000, and so we are managing that accordingly with all of the stake holders. >> i might submit to you colleagues, that maybe when we have a smaller not-to-exceed amount, and i mean that i don't want to say not-to-exceed half a million, when it should be not-to-exceed 200,000 or 300,000. why don't we wait until they narrow that amount down. and appropriate ate what needs to actually be appropriate ated. >> i am sorry, could you -- i don't think that i understand what you are suggesting. >> the operations and maintenance of the vita point include security. as well as just over all maintenance, and garage pick up as well as the

a great question commissioner peskin. and these are, they are temporary in nature, and these are maximum budget amount of 500,000 all the way through the end of 2018. and we are currently right now, working with the state of california, in the area of the toll authority to go ahead and institute some additional improvements in the area that frankly would put us in a position to send a lot less than 500,000, and so we are managing that accordingly with all of the stake holders. >> i might submit to you colleagues, that maybe when we have a smaller not-to-exceed amount, and i mean that i don't want to say not-to-exceed half a million, when it should be not-to-exceed 200,000 or 300,000. why don't we wait until they narrow that amount down. and appropriate ate what needs to actually be appropriate ated. >> i am sorry, could you -- i don't think that i understand what you are suggesting. >> the operations and maintenance of the vita point include security. as well as just over all maintenance, and garage pick up as well as the

cohen and supervisor peskin. san francisco issuers staggering number of approximate 40,000 student beds that this is just truly remarkable. these 40,000 students compete with everyone else is looking for housing which makes housing more expensive for everyone. if you years ago supervisor generator offered legislation to identify new student housing while making it abundantly clear it's illegal to convert existing general population housing to student housing in san francisco. student housing as it is today is generally exempt from inclusion rate requirements so long as that housing remains a student housing. hence existing law requires that any point housing entitled the student housing later decides to convert to general population housing at that point the project is required to meet all of its inclusionary requirements, plus intricate today ordinance in no way alters this requirements. student housing to be provided in two ways. the educational institution itself can build housing for its own students or, when

. >> good afternoon supervisor peskin, supervisor president london breed and members of the board i'm listing ca is a acting environmental officer the question whether the project anothers 115 south van ness avenue kwflgz for a plan expectation in corneas with the california environmental quality act and the ceqa guidelines i'll be making a few opening remarks before i i'm going to turn it over to linda who prepares the subject of the appeal i'll describe the project and highlighted two oishlgz raise in the appeal that ever rays on recent ceqa appeals before the board the project sight is three-quarters of an acre 33 square feet building that was occupied by mcmillan electric that moved to cesar chavez street the pivoting building b will be demolished the planning department issued a c pe on july the documented the review of the environmental effects and the construction of a 5 or 6 mixed use building and the project will include one and 56 dwelling units 26 onsite housing units and include one thousand square feet of commercial retail use and 4 thousand trade shop space and parking f

a great question commissioner peskin. and these are, they are temporary in nature, and these are maximum budget amount of 500,000 all the way through the end of 2018. and we are currently right now, working with the state of california, in the area of the toll authority to go ahead and institute some additional improvements in the area that frankly would put us in a position to send a lot less than 500,000, and so we are managing that accordingly with all of the stake holders. >> i might submit to you colleagues, that maybe when we have a smaller not-to-exceed amount, and i mean that i don't want to say not-to-exceed half a million, when it should be not-to-exceed 200,000 or 300,000. why don't we wait until they narrow that amount down. and appropriate ate what needs to actually be appropriate ated. >> i am sorry, could you -- i don't think that i understand what you are suggesting. >> the operations and maintenance of the vita point include security. as well as just over all maintenance, and garage pick up as well as the

he is, and aaron peskin welcome back. thank you all so much for being here and we are also joined by the former clerk gloria young, thank you so much. before we get started i would like to take a moment of silence to acknowledge the folks who have worked through this chamber, who are no longer with us today. something that we agree on is that people love coming to san francisco, settlers and immigrants began arriving after the first independent homestead was erected near what is today is known as port mouth square in 1843. the town was growing very quickly, and was renamed san francisco on january 30th 1847. the california gold rush increased our population over night, from 1,000 people in 1848, to 25,000 by december 1849. in february of 1849, the citizens of what was known as the district of san francisco erected a legislative assembly. which they empowered to make laws not in conflict with the constitution of the united states nor the common laws thereof. today, is about recognizing the legislative chamber and all of th

. >> thank you last month supervisor peskin and i introduced this legislation inform place regulations on short-term rentals in the city the legislation informed by research from the school of hospitality at penn state university a cap on short-term rentals whether the host is present or not and grandfathered in hosts that have registered with the city at the existing 90 day cap for unhosted rent-controlled units for 36 hours cap for hosted reversals that styles the cost for department of emergency the violation of short-term rental law and empowers nonprofit that are dedicated to preserving the housing for enforcement of violated of short-term rentals law i've said we need robust effective regulations of short-term rentals and we need to make changes when something is not working as well as we know that should be we have far too many hosts not registering with the city and people exceeding or just ignoring the annual rental caps this tack critical housing units off the market making them unavailable for those struggling to find an affordable place it shouldn't be for lucrative to offe

. >> supervisor peskin i take the liberty of revealing the data i find out that project has a lethal i didn't history there were two other - two site permits prior to the one i take over in 2003 when i look at the record in 2003 that building is built almost exactly like the other building. >> however, it is only with - without the perimeter frame with the concrete core and very similar to the building in the infiniti building we have flexible a revalley on that plus the patoma building and it is exceptional to have a train high-rise that's why i invoked the panel it was not a code proscribed design it was plus the train tunnels go through that. >> what did we find out during that peer review. >> i have flexible 3 professor bailey, mr. leon, what's his - from. >> mit and no graduated from mit joseph and also doctor - who's the expert inform soil interaction ross are the 3 panel i was - the city began to look at the site so not that much of a period you bring on at that stage. >> mr. tom do you recall the letters from the mitts professors charles and andrew including it will sink as m

cohen and supervisor peskin. san francisco issuers staggering number of approximate 40,000 student beds that this is just truly remarkable. these 40,000 students compete with everyone else is looking for housing which makes housing more expensive for everyone. if you years ago supervisor generator offered legislation to identify new student housing while making it abundantly clear it's illegal to convert existing general population housing to student housing in san francisco. student housing as it is today is generally exempt from inclusion rate requirements so long as that housing remains a student housing. hence existing law requires that any point housing entitled the student housing later decides to convert to general population housing at that point the project is required to meet all of its inclusionary requirements, plus intricate today ordinance in no way alters this requirements. student housing to be provided in two ways. the educational institution itself can build housing for its own students or, when

nash and supervisor peskin for the late mr. donald and ms.leanor thank you madam clerk, is there any additional business to come before this body? >> that concludes our business for today thank you, colleagues we're we great to have so many people here for the launch of the sf can iron initiative you'll hear from other people momentarily by my first duty to introduce the mayor of the city and county of san francisco the honorable mayor edwin lee that will make a few remarks. >> (clapping.) >> thank you, very much. we are in san francisco. >> yeah. >> yeah. >> and today it is another opportunity to announce in my lifetime one of the most exciting things we do and if we could just put our imagination active hearts and minds together and say to ourselves that we can actually cure cancer in san francisco with the partnerships that we have we're going to do that the best we can beginning today. >> (clapping.) >> i've always, always cherished this relationship that our general has with uc san francisco it's research abilities our ability to spoke t

colleagues a motion to excuse supervisor wiener and supervisor yee move forward by supervisor peskin and seconded by supervisor farrell without objection, without objection supervisor yee and supervisor wiener are excused all right. colleagues, any changes to the october 4, 2016, board meeting minutes seeing none, a motion moved by supervisor mar and seconded by supervisor peskin colleagues without objection without objection those meeting minutes pass after public comment. >> madam clerk call the first item the special ordinance the mayors appearance before the board the honorable mayor edwin lee no questions submitted from supervisors from the even districts any address the board up to 5 minutes. >> mr. mayor the floor is yours. >> good afternoon, supervisors and members of the public i want to say thank you all. participating at the unite gatherings now more than ever the people of san francisco wants to be united in a city that paves the way for better policy and outcomes the federal election clarified much we agree on in to no more than ever needs to stand for citizens and our v

the government audit & oversight for today wednesday, october 265, 2016, i'm the brunt chair aaron peskin joined by board president london breed our clerk clerk erica major madam clerk, any announcements? >> . >> yes. documents to be included should be submitted to the clerk. items acted upon today will appear on the please read the brunt first item. >> may we make a motion. >> i'd like to make a motion to excuse vice chair supervisor norman yee can we take that without objection? that will be the order. and madam clerk the first item on a resolution urging the employee richard to hold a public hearing and issue a report >> thank you. the sponsor of that report has asked that we - we mr. unexcuse supervisor yee he showed up and supervisor yee we called item fundi have been informed this to the to postponed without objection. >> supervisor yee is excused any any public comment on item one without objection we'll continue that item through the chair. >> madam clerk the brunt final item. >> the oversight processes for the fine arts museum of san francisco and it's board of trustees thank you

. >> thank you last month supervisor peskin and i introduced this legislation inform place regulationson short-term rentals in the city the legislation informed by research from the school of hospitality at penn state university a cap on short-term rentals whether the host is present or not and grandfathered in hosts that have registered with the city at the existing 90 day cap for unhosted rent-controlled units for 36 hours cap for hosted reversals that styles the cost for department of emergency the violation of short-term rental law and empowers nonprofit that are dedicated to preserving the housing for enforcement of violated of short-term rentals law i've said we need robust effective regulations of short-term rentals and we need to make changes when something is not working as well as we know that should be we have far too many hosts not registering with the city and people exceeding or just ignoring the annual rental caps this tack critical housing units off the market making them unavailable for those struggling to find an affordable place it shouldn't be for lucrative to offer

a great question commissioner peskin.nd these are, they are temporary in nature, and these are maximum budget amount of 500,000 all the way through the end of 2018. and we are currently right now, working with the state of california, in the area of the toll authority to go ahead and institute some additional improvements in the area that frankly would put us in a position to send a lot less than 500,000, and so we are managing that accordingly with all of the stake holders. >> i might submit to you colleagues, that maybe when we have a smaller not-to-exceed amount, and i mean that i don't want to say not-to-exceed half a million, when it should be not-to-exceed 200,000 or 300,000. why don't we wait until they narrow that amount down. and appropriate ate what needs to actually be appropriate ated. >> i am sorry, could you -- i don't think that i understand what you are suggesting. >> the operations and maintenance of the vita point include security. as well as just over all maintenance, and garage pick up as well as the s

nash and supervisor peskin for the late mr. donald and ms. eleanor thank you madam clerk, is there any additional business to come before this body? >> that concludes our business for today thank you, colleagues we're >> all right. good morning, everybody. welcome to the transportation authority plans & programs committee for tuesday, november 15, 2016, like to thank our clerk steve stamos and leo and mark from sfgovtv madam clerk, any announcements? no announce. >> mr. clerk item one. >> roll call commissioner avalos commissioner breed absent commissioner farrell commissioner peskin commissioner hwang absent we have quorum okay. thank you very much colleagu colleagues commissioner tang had a previous engagement can i have a motion can we take that without objection? 70 >> all right. mr. clerk item number 2. >> sense advisory report this is an informational item. >> good morning item number 4 the $3.1 million for the traffic calming most of questions or comments from the cca the clarifications on specification by the degree to which federal d

. >> thank you thank you supervisor peskin. >> madam president someone you don't know supervisor peskin. >> i didn't know the chickens i never met the chickens. >> (laughter). all right. colleagues moving right along thank you so madam clerk let's go to our items for adoption without reference to committee >> a member may object and serve an item and have it considered separately. >> madam clerk one item i believe can you pull 54 supervisor cowen. >> thank you madam president i was going to ask to sever 54 as well. >> on the remaining items colleagues colleagues, can we take that same house, same call? without objection those items are approved unanimously marking call 54. >> a motion to schedule the board of supervisors to seeing no other names on the roster, today november 5th o'clock to hear the law enforcement practices. >> supervisor cowen. >> motion to table. >> yes. i'd like to make a a motion to table seconded by supervisor peskin colleagues without objection, without objection this item will be tabled madam clerk call item 43. >> item 43 is a public hearing the board of supervi

supervisor peskin. >> thank you madam chair. to supervisor wiener through the chair, you're referring to the language onlines 24 and 25 page 65? >> yes, that is correct. where it says, appendix d fire apperateess access code, section d 105 of the fire code is adopted. we will strip out those two lines. >> okay, so the document that you just handed out, that is a a additional change because you have on page 42 and 43 you got some new language and then so you are saying this is a additional change? >> that is correct and my apologize, i should clarify. when we prepared the amendments we didn't realize at that time really until shortly before the hearing the department insert adupgz of appendix d. you are correct, the written amendments before you include the clean up amendments requested by the department, the reinstatement of the bulb-outs and make a oral amendment to strip out the reference of adoption of appendix d and thank you for that clarification supervisor. >> thank you. >> thank you, let's go with the presentation from t

we also have sfr visor farrell and peskin making adu city wide. you are probably aware the governor also signed just recently a state law that essentially facilitates and encourages owners to do adu's by waving the utility cost for connections. that does save substantial amounts of dollars so whether or not this actually leads to more adu permits, we'll have to wait and see. as of right now dbi issued 29 of those permits, we had about 134 applications filed. there are still 116 of them under review at planning and another 17 under review at the fire department. so, we are trying to coordinate with planning to see what some of the review issues might be on adu. they continue to be a potential source for more affordable housing, but i would say the process is still relatively slow. i think mentioned earlier during the president announcement the triannual codes have been passed. the board passed that unanimously on consent yesterday. we made arrangements with the mayors office to try to obtain that signature soon in the next day or two so will make o

supervisor peskin. >> thank you madam chair. to supervisor wiener through the chair, you're referring to the language onlines 24 and 25 page 65? >> yes, that is correct. where it says, appendix d fire apperateess access code, section d 105 of the fire code is adopted. we will strip out those two lines. >> okay, so the document that you just handed out, that is a a additional change because you have on page 42 and 43 you got some new language and then so you are saying this is a additional change? >> that is correct and my apologize, i should clarify. when we prepared the amendments we didn't realize at that time really until shortly before the hearing the department insert adupgz of appendix d. you are correct, the written amendments before you include the clean up amendments requested by the department, the reinstatement of the bulb-outs and make a oral amendment to strip out the reference of adoption of appendix d and thank you for that clarification supervisor. >> thank you. >> thank you, let's go with the presentation from t

breed supervisor campos supervisor cowen supervisor farrell supervisor kim supervisor mar supervisor peskin supervisor tang supervisor wiener not present supervisor yee madam president we have quorum. >> thank you, ladies and gentlemen, please join us in the pledge of allegiance and to the republic for which it stands, one nation under god, indivisible, with liberty and justice for all. >> all right. madam clerk any communications >> yes. madam president by a memorandum on october 1, '26 in receipt of cornerstones if mar communicating his veto of legislative that established the neighborhood property be crime unit in the police department pursuant to the charter the board any veto with not less than two-thirds and if i member wants to schedule and vote let me know by 5:00 p.m. >> colleagues by changes to the september 26th you can 2016 board meeting minutes seeing none, a motion by supervisor mar and seconded by supervisor farrell colleagues those will be approved after the public comment. >> items 1 through 5 the consented as a whole and not to individual board members, no one is required

colleagues a motion to excuse supervisor wiener and supervisor yee move forward by supervisor peskin and seconded by supervisor farrell without objection, without objection supervisor yee and supervisor wiener are excused all right. colleagues, any changes to the october 4, 2016, board meeting minutes seeing none, a motion moved by supervisor mar and seconded by supervisor peskin colleagues without objection without objection those meeting minutes pass after public comment. >> madam clerk call the first item the special ordinance the mayors appearance before the board the honorable mayor edwin lee no questions submitted from supervisors from the even districts any address the board up to 5 minutes. >> mr. mayor the floor is yours. >> good afternoon, supervisors and members of the public i want to say thank you all. participating at the unite gatherings now more than ever the people of san francisco wants to be united in a city that paves the way for better policy and outcomes the federal election clarified much we agree on in to no more than ever needs to stand for citizens and our v

colleagues a motion to excuse supervisor wiener and supervisor yee move forward by supervisor peskin and seconded by supervisor farrell without objection, without objection supervisor yee and supervisor wiener are excused all right. colleagues, any changes to the october 4, 2016, board meeting minutes seeing none, a motion moved by supervisor mar and seconded by supervisor peskin colleagues without objection without objection those meeting minutes pass after public comment. >> madam clerk call the first item the special ordinance the mayors appearance before the board the honorable mayor edwin lee no questions submitted from supervisors from the even districts any address the board up to 5 minutes. >> mr. mayor the floor is yours. >> good afternoon, supervisors and members of the public i want to say thank you all. participating at the unite gatherings now more than ever the people of san francisco wants to be united in a city that paves the way for better policy and outcomes the federal election clarified much we agree on in to no more than ever needs to stand for citizens and our v

colleagues a motion to excuse supervisor wiener and supervisor yee move forward by supervisor peskin and seconded by supervisor farrell without objection, without objection supervisor yee and supervisor wiener are excused all right. colleagues, any changes to the october 4, 2016, board meeting minutes seeing none, a motion moved by supervisor mar and seconded by supervisor peskin colleagues without objection without objection those meeting minutes pass after public comment. >> madam clerk call the first item the special ordinance the mayors appearance before the board the honorable mayor edwin lee no questions submitted from supervisors from the even districts any address the board up to 5 minutes. >> mr. mayor the floor is yours. >> good afternoon, supervisors and members of the public i want to say thank you all. participating at the unite gatherings now more than ever the people of san francisco wants to be united in a city that paves the way for better policy and outcomes the federal election clarified much we agree on in to no more than ever needs to stand for citizens and our v

breed supervisor campos supervisor cowen supervisor farrell supervisor kim supervisor mar supervisor peskin supervisor tang supervisor wiener not present supervisor yee madam president we have quorum. >> thank you, ladies and gentlemen, please join us in the pledge of allegiance and to the republic for which it stands, one nation under god, indivisible, with liberty and justice for all. >> all right. madam clerk any communications >> yes. madam president by a memorandum on october 1, '26 in receipt of cornerstones if mar communicating his veto of legislative that established the neighborhood property be crime unit in the police department pursuant to the charter the board any veto with not less than two-thirds and if i member wants to schedule and vote let me know by 5:00 p.m. >> colleagues by changes to the september 26th you can 2016 board meeting minutes seeing none, a motion by supervisor mar and seconded by supervisor farrell colleagues those will be approved after the public comment. >> items 1 through 5 the consented as a whole and not to individual board members, no one is required

. >> thank you last month supervisor peskin and i introduced this legislation inform place regulations on short-term rentals in the city the legislation informed by research from the school of hospitality at penn state university a cap on short-term rentals whether the host is present or not and grandfathered in hosts that have registered with the city at the existing 90 day cap for unhosted rent-controlled units for 36 hours cap for hosted reversals that styles the cost for department of emergency the violation of short-term rental law and empowers nonprofit that are dedicated to preserving the housing for enforcement of violated of short-term rentals law i've said we need robust effective regulations of short-term rentals and we need to make changes when something is not working as well as we know that should be we have far too many hosts not registering with the city and people exceeding or just ignoring the annual rental caps this tack critical housing units off the market making them unavailable for those struggling to find an affordable place it shouldn't be for lucrative to offe

i'm supervisor cowen the chair and to my right is it scott wiener the arock and to my left is aaron peskin our clerk alicia and take moment to thank our forensics leo and nona melkonian for evaluating us in the broadcast thank you very much madam clerk, any announcements? >> >> yes. all electronic devices. completed speaker cards and documents to be included should be submitted to the clerk. items acted upon today will appear on the. >> okay great you both are ready to present on this item and shelly campbell take that away. >> good afternoon. i'm shelly the public works personnel we're here for the jurisdiction challenge from the point of privilege the item before you is virtually for the public works sewer system improvement program the sewer system improvement program is a $20 million investment required to renovate, upgrade our aging infrastructure to insure reliable and seismically sewer system for generations to come france is 70 projects 2 plus billion dollars is alter southeast plant which started out 70 years ago property jurisdictional challenge was initiate to enable the sfpuc t

. >> thank you last month supervisor peskin and i introduced this legislation inform place regulations on short-term rentals in the city the legislation informed by research from the school of hospitality at penn state university a cap on short-term rentals whether the host is present or not and grandfathered in hosts that have registered with the city at the existing 90 day cap for unhosted rent-controlled units for 36 hours cap for hosted reversals that styles the cost for department of emergency the violation of short-term rental law and empowers nonprofit that are dedicated to preserving the housing for enforcement of violated of short-term rentals law i've said we need robust effective regulations of short-term rentals and we need to make changes when something is not working as well as we know that should be we have far too many hosts not registering with the city and people exceeding or just ignoring the annual rental caps this tack critical housing units off the market making them unavailable for those struggling to find an affordable place it shouldn't be for lucrative to offe

breed supervisor campos supervisor cowen supervisor farrell supervisor kim supervisor mar supervisor peskin supervisor tang supervisor wiener not present supervisor yee madam president we have quorum. >> thank you, ladies and gentlemen, please join us in the pledge of allegiance and to the republic for which it stands, one nation under god, indivisible, with liberty and justice for all. >> all right. madam clerk any communications >> yes. madam president by a memorandum on october 1, '26 in receipt of cornerstones if mar communicating his veto of legislative that established the neighborhood property be crime unit in the police department pursuant to the charter the board any veto with not less than two-thirds and if i member wants to schedule and vote let me know by 5:00 p.m. >> colleagues by changes to the september 26th you can 2016 board meeting minutes seeing none, a motion by supervisor mar and seconded by supervisor farrell colleagues those will be approved after the public comment. >> items 1 through 5 the consented as a whole and not to individual board members, no one is required

breed supervisor campos supervisor cowen supervisor farrell supervisor kim supervisor mar supervisor peskin supervisor tang supervisor wiener not present supervisor yee madam president we have quorum. >> thank you, ladies and gentlemen, please join us in the pledge of allegiance and to the republic for which it stands, one nation under god, indivisible, with liberty and justice for all. >> all right. madam clerk any communications >> yes. madam president by a memorandum on october 1, '26 in receipt of cornerstones if mar communicating his veto of legislative that established the neighborhood property be crime unit in the police department pursuant to the charter the board any veto with not less than two-thirds and if i member wants to schedule and vote let me know by 5:00 p.m. >> colleagues by changes to the september 26th you can 2016 board meeting minutes seeing none, a motion by supervisor mar and seconded by supervisor farrell colleagues those will be approved after the public comment. >> items 1 through 5 the consented as a whole and not to individual board members, no one is required

he is, and aaron peskin welcome back.and we are also joined by the former clerk gloria young, thank you so much. before we get started i would like to take a moment of silence to acknowledge the folks who have worked through this chamber, who are no longer with us today. something that we agree on is that people love coming to san francisco, settlers and immigrants began arriving after the first independent homestead was erected near what is today is known as port mouth square in 1843. the town was growing very quickly, and was renamed san francisco on january 30th 1847. the california gold rush increased our population over night, from 1,000 people in 1848, to 25,000 by december 1849. in february of 1849, the citizens of what was known as the district of san francisco erected a legislative assembly. which they empowered to make laws not in conflict with the constitution of the united states nor the common laws thereof. today, is about recognizing the legislative chamber and all of the actions that took place here to help

. >> thank you last month supervisor peskin and i introduced this legislation inform place regulations on short-term rentals in the city the legislation informed by research from the school of hospitality at penn state university a cap on short-term rentals whether the host is present or not and grandfathered in hosts that have registered with the city at the existing 90 day cap for unhosted rent-controlled units for 36 hours cap for hosted reversals that styles the cost for department of emergency the violation of short-term rental law and empowers nonprofit that are dedicated to preserving the housing for enforcement of violated of short-term rentals law i've said we need robust effective regulations of short-term rentals and we need to make changes when something is not working as well as we know that should be we have far too many hosts not registering with the city and people exceeding or just ignoring the annual rental caps this tack critical housing units off the market making them unavailable for those struggling to find an affordable place it shouldn't be for lucrative to offe

peskin absent tang absent weiner,, present. yee, present. we have a quorum >> thank you. go to item 2 >> item 2 chairs report this is an information item >> november election but mixed results for our transportation sector along with others in our region the transportation authority was delighted that measure rr 3.5 bond passed handily in november with the sport of 81% of san francisco voters. this measure will ensure bart has the funds it needs to conduct pressing maintenance work systemwide particular the transbay tube. measure rr is important for safety and reliability and also hands capacity to train control upgrades and much needed maintenance facilities than one item not included in the spark bond was relating to recreation and park fleet expansion of 300 vehicles. these were included in local county measures including prop j in san francisco relating to transportation of homelessness funding. as you note the voters overwhelmingly supported prop j with 60% in 67% of the vote which rejected prop k the measure that would fund prop j and without a funding source mayor

cohen and supervisor peskin.ncisco issuers staggering number of approximate 40,000 student beds that this is just truly remarkable. these 40,000 students compete with everyone else is looking for housing which makes housing more expensive for everyone. if you years ago supervisor generator offered legislation to identify new student housing while making it abundantly clear it's illegal to convert existing general population housing to student housing in san francisco. student housing as it is today is generally exempt from inclusion rate requirements so long as that housing remains a student housing. hence existing law requires that any point housing entitled the student housing later decides to convert to general population housing at that point the project is required to meet all of its inclusionary requirements, plus intricate today ordinance in no way alters this requirements. student housing to be provided in two ways. the educational institution itself can build housing for its own students or, when a more

. >> oh, i'm sorry supervisor campos. >> supervisor peskin and i get confused with each other all the time it's the height. >> bow tie and that's right that's right thank you madam president colleagues as you may know this is an item of a hearing that was held at the board at the last meeting an interesting meeting and what we have here is finding that reflect a motion that was made and as supervisor so for the district and the maker of that motion i want to make a couple of things clear because i think is that this is a preentdz action by the board of supervisors is in in respect the option before the board were in a way perhaps not as clear in terms of capturing what we intend why i intended to happen i don't think the motion right now reflects what that intent and i actually know from talking with not just the project sponsor but the appellants themselves not clear point motion reflects when what i think people want to come out but my view i was hoping to accomplish additional analysis on the question of whether socioeconomic changes like adapt had a physical impact on the environm