>> supervisor peskin: yes. >> okay. we're really excite to turn our attention to with partnering with the departments as well as building up the capacity of leadership of people with lived experience. really fundamentally transformative ways. very excited to work with the board, work with the mayor's office and work with our fellow committee members. i want to thank all the committee members who served. we were very active committee and dedicated a ton of time to this. i think it really paid off. i think it's going to make an impact on our city. thank you very much. >> supervisor peskin: thank you ms. leadbetter for your service and your work on the inaugural effort. with that, going once going twice, ms. friedenbach. wow. right there on time. [laughter] >> yeah, can you guys hear me? >> supervisor peskin: yes, we can hear you. i want to thank you for proposition c while we have the chance. >> that was the really complicated entry on to this. for some reason, it wasn't letting me unmute myself. my apologies. i've been r

chair peskin? >> supervisor peskin: thank you president walton. thank you for your work on this issue, seeing no comments from committee members. why won't we open this up to presentations by the eight individual applicants for the four seats. we will start with ovava eterci afuhaamango. i apologize if i mispronounced your name. applicant for seat number one. >> hi, can you hear me? >> supervisor peskin: yes, we can. >> my name is ovava. i'm born and raised in the city. i have family all over the city. even though my line of work is in private marketing, this a urban impacts me and my community directly. as far as work experience i have a bachelor's degree in public policy. i see this role as at next step helping my community. i'm applying for vacant seat number one. if there are any questions, i'm happy to answer. i can go into depth. >> supervisor peskin: thank you. any questions from committee members? let's move on to the next applicant, alexandra post for seats 1-4. hold on. president walton? >> supervisor walton: i did have one question. i w

supervisor peskin. >> supervisor peskin: thank you.i agree that it is good to have goals and good to have ambitious goals and i was involved in much earlier iterations of the climate action plan and it's heartening to see the graph with the decreasing rates and all of those subareas, matter of fact, many years ago, i was sent by you guys to the meeting of the parties in new delhi and at that time, we were wrestling with things like putting light emitting diods into all of our lights. i wanted to call to the attention of my colleagues and ask the department some questions around the area of housing. it is good to have ambitious goals but they also weighed into public policy that i think really might not belong in chapter 9 of your code. when we get into issues of affordability and stream line -- for instance, on page 8 lines 10-11, there's a line about a goal to build 5,000 new housing units per year. i think it's a good goal. how did you come up with 5,000, why not 7500 or 10,000. where did we get that. and a policy statement, 30% whic

peskin. >> clerk: on the motion to approve the minutes, [roll call] there are eleven ayes. >> president walton: without objection. the minutes will be approved after public comment as presented. madam clerk. let's go to the consent agenda items 1 through 7. >> clerk: items 1 through 7 are on consent. these items are considered to be routine. if a member objects an item may be removed and considered separately. >> president walton: thank you, colleagues, anyone wish to sever any items? i don't see anyone. please call the roll on items 1 through 7. >> clerk: on items 1 through 7, [roll call] >> clerk: there are 11 ayes. >> president walton: without objection, these ordinances are passed on the first reading and these resolutions are adopted unanimously. madam clerk, please call unfinished business, item number 8. >> clerk: item 8 is an ordinance to amend the administrative code to prohibit landlords for nonpayment of rental that was not paid due to the covid-19 pandemic provided the tenant has

. >> commissioner peskin. absent. >> commissioner preston. >> present. >> commissioner ronen. >> present. >> commissioner safai. absent. >> commissioner stefani. >> present. >> commissioner walton. >> present. >> we have a quorum. >> thank you. i want to note that commissioner chanwas excused. will you please call the next item. >> i will make an announcement about public comment. public comment will be available for each item on the agenda by calling 415-655-0001. access code (187)736-6351 of the pound pound. you will be able to be a participant. when the item is call press star 3. when it is your turn to speak you will hear a message and you will be allowed two minutes to speak. calls taken in the order received. speak slowly and clear down the volume of your television or radio. item 2. chair's report. information item. >> thank you, madam clerk. colleagues, i want to thank vice-chairman delman and commissioner ronen for serving on this committee. we will consider adoption of employer and worker affordabili

supervisor peskin. >> supervisor peskin: thank you, colleagues. today, i'm introducing a piece of legislation that hopefully all eleven of us can agree on that we are lovingly calling the love your laundromat legislation. this is a piece of legislation that's actually the result of about a year's worth of research in my office and that research shows what i think we have seen which is that laundro mats tend to be in the city and serve lower income communities and less likely to have in-home washers and driers kind of what you'd expect. and as we learned last september, when a tons of bubbles was facing displacement by their landlord, the availability of cleaning services is without a doubt a social and racial equity issue. it's an issue that impacts seniors and people with disabilities and everybody in the neighborhood they are a key piece of social infrastructure and the presiptous drop in the number of laundromats in the city is something we should take note about. according to the data from the san francisco p.u.c., 84 of the city's listen sinc

supervisor peskin? >> supervisor peskin: thank you. i want to thank the mayor's office and supervisor chan for coming to a reasonable commendation that will allow us to complete the budget. i just researched that if you joined the parks alliance, you can get additional tickets to conservatory flowers. i wonder if that includes the 5% or how that works? we'll figure that out in a separate hearing. >> president walton: thank you, so much. i do want to say, i think it is very interesting that there's an entity that receives money that belongs to the city and county of san francisco when we collect fees. that is a very interesting relationship. i 100% think it's inappropriate relationship. i want to make sure i stated that for the record. with that said, madam clerk, can we get a roll call on item 36 as amended and accepted by the mayor? would that be the right way to frame it? >> clerk: thank you for asking. our minutes will reflect that the mayor's office requested that the board of supervisors make these changes and the board agreed to

supervisor peskin? >> supervisor peskin: thank you. i want to thank the mayor's office and supervisor chan for coming to a reasonable commendation that will allow us to complete the budget. i just researched that if you joined the parks alliance, you can get additional tickets to conservatory flowers. i wonder if that includes the 5% or how that works? we'll figure that out in a separate hearing. >> president walton: thank you, so much. i do want to say, i think it is very interesting that there's an entity that receives money that belongs to the city and county of san francisco when we collect fees. that is a very interesting relationship. i 100% think it's inappropriate relationship. i want to make sure i stated that for the record. with that said, madam clerk, can we get a roll call on item 36 as amended and accepted by the mayor? would that be the right way to frame it? >> clerk: thank you for asking. our minutes will reflect that the mayor's office requested that the board of supervisors make these changes and the board agreed to

supervisor peskin? >> supervisor peskin: thank you, president walton. i would like to move to incorporate number one to that new exhibit, unless the city attorney believes that that new exhibit that was circulated to all of you today is already incorporated; and second is, i would also like to make a motion -- and second, i would also like to make a motion, while it would still approve the acceptance from the moneys of state of california, would not authorize the general manager of the recreation and parks department to enter into modifications and amendments to the grant contract, including to any of its exhibits. so i would like to move, at page two, after, on-line 18, the word contract, to insert a period there, and to remove the rest of that resolve provision on the balance of that page and the first two lines of page 3. >> president walton: thank you, supervisor peskin. do we have a second? thank you. there's a motion to amend made by supervisor peskin, seconded by supervisor chan, and i believe these are not substantive. they are not. city attorne

supervisor peskin? >> supervisor peskin: thank you. with regard to outside bodies, i serve on the bay conservation and development commission which regulates development in the bay and within 100 feet of the shoreline for the nine counties. it's a 27-member commission with a half century of history. we met on may 6, 2021 and discussed all sorts of regional decisions. we received a briefing on the policies of the san francisco water front special area plan which was first adopted in 1975 and amended in the year 2000. which amendments resulted in the creation of a number of open spaces along the water front. on june 17th, we received a briefing regarding mixed use development and discussed as an informational item, that proposed projects consistency or lack there of with the public trust doctrine that established bay conservation and development commission. i served on the san francisco restoration authority. that is the body that distributes the $25 million per year in the $12 per parcel measure aa parcel tax for the nine counties. we d

supervisor peskin? >> supervisor peskin: thank you, president walton. i would like to move to incorporate number one to that new exhibit, unless the city attorney believes that that new exhibit that was circulated to all of you today is already incorporated; and second is, i would also like to make a motion -- and second, i would also like to make a motion, while it would still approve the acceptance from the moneys of state of california, would not authorize the general manager of the recreation and parks department to enter into modifications and amendments to the grant contract, including to any of its exhibits. so i would like to move, at page two, after, on-line 18, the word contract, to insert a period there, and to remove the rest of that resolve provision on the balance of that page and the first two lines of page 3. >> president walton: thank you, supervisor peskin. do we have a second? thank you. there's a motion to amend made by supervisor peskin, seconded by supervisor chan, and i believe these are not substantive. they are not. city attorne

supervisor peskin? >> supervisor peskin: thank you. with regard to outside bodies, i serve on the bay conservation and development commission which regulates development in the bay and within 100 feet of the shoreline for the nine counties. it's a 27-member commission with a half century of history. we met on may 6, 2021 and discussed all sorts of regional decisions. we received a briefing on the policies of the san francisco water front special area plan which was first adopted in 1975 and amended in the year 2000. which amendments resulted in the creation of a number of open spaces along the water front. on june 17th, we received a briefing regarding mixed use development and discussed as an informational item, that proposed projects consistency or lack there of with the public trust doctrine that established bay conservation and development commission. i served on the san francisco restoration authority. that is the body that distributes the $25 million per year in the $12 per parcel measure aa parcel tax for the nine counties. we d

supervisor peskin. >> supervisor peskin: thank you, madam chair. i'm disappointed on the e-mails i got on behalf of the san francisco golf alliance. i would be honored to be listed as a co-sponsor. >> chairman: thank you, supervisor peskin. supervisor mar. welcome to our committee. go ahead. >> supervisor mar: thanks chair melgar. i'm actually here for another item but i'd like to thank you for the opportunity on this for bringing this landmark designation forward. kind of like the action the board just took last week to establish. just to confirm on the effort to really recognize and lift up the rich heritage of the chinese community and in this case, many different, you know, ethnic communities in our city as well as other communities and especially on the west side of the city. so thanks to the chinese historical society of america and all the advocates and i would love to be added as a co-sponsor as well. >> chairman: supervisor preston. >> supervisor preston: thank you, chair melgar and supervisor chan and also just sharing so much of this his

so, colleagues, as the supervisor said and chair peskin said. i'm bringing three ordinances all in one. in our efforts to reimagine how we distribute food and food related services to our most vulnerable residents here in san francisco. these three ordinances build off one another. the food security task force was first created by former supervisor sophie maxwell in 2005. for 16 years, the department of health under the fundamental leadership of ms. paula jones and susie smith community based organization silos. as our city begins to recover from the covid-19 pandemic, the role of security passport has become even more important. and more certain in covid in what we're all experiencing. agenda item number four seeks to reauthorize the food security task force for another three years. while tasking the body to provide a more expensive report. the new report and data that we seek for nearly the last 18 months of the covid pandemic, our city has seen first-hand of bankrupt undocumented community members and long time residents and seniors. many res

supervisor peskin. >> supervisor peskin: thank you, president walton. see, i was starting to sit because none of you would stand up and now you're all standing upo i'll stand up and regale you with a bit of history that starts long before my time. muni used to be a property of the san francisco p.u.c. and it was later spun off long before i was on the board of supervisors as its own entity. in 1999 there was an agreement between then supervisor gavin newsome and then another supervisor that gave the m.t.a. a lot of autonomy from the elected board of supervisors. and ostensibly the chief executive -- the mayor. and while it is true that the elected board of supervisors has been largely -- since 1999 -- divorced from the day-to-day governance of the m.t.a. and that is less true over newsome and all the way through. i think they see themselves as an executive agency. but the fundamental proposition e of 1999 was actually aimed at making them transcend it from politics, from the legislative and the executive branches. and to dip into a stable source of base

supervisor peskin. >> supervisor peskin: thank you, president walton. see, i was starting to sit because none of you would stand up and now you're all standing upo i'll stand up and regale you with a bit of history that starts long before my time. muni used to be a property of the san francisco p.u.c. and it was later spun off long before i was on the board of supervisors as its own entity. in 1999 there was an agreement between then supervisor gavin newsome and then another supervisor that gave the m.t.a. a lot of autonomy from the elected board of supervisors. and ostensibly the chief executive -- the mayor. and while it is true that the elected board of supervisors has been largely -- since 1999 -- divorced from the day-to-day governance of the m.t.a. and that is less true over newsome and all the way through. i think they see themselves as an executive agency. but the fundamental proposition e of 1999 was actually aimed at making them transcend it from politics, from the legislative and the executive branches. and to dip into a stable source of base

supervisor peskin? >> supervisor peskin: president walton, on page 2 of the motion, starting at line 9, we need to make some changes insofar as mr. corette, while i hold him in high esteem, he has not served as the director as local 21. whereas moses corette will represent the largest number of employees currently employed by the redevelopment agency as a member of the international federation of professional and technical engineers local 21, semicolon, and. >> president walton: thank you, supervisor peskin. i believe that was a motion to amend the language? >> supervisor peskin: yes, sir. >> president walton: seconded by supervisor preston. madam clerk, on the motion to amend item 54, made by supervisor peskin, seconded by supervisor preston, roll call, please. [roll call] >> clerk: there are 11 ayes. >> president walton: and without objection, the motion to amend passes unanimously. madam clerk, please call the roll on the remaining item. >> clerk: on item 54 -- [roll call] >> clerk: there are 11 ayes

supervisor peskin? >> supervisor peskin: thank you madam chair.the last item, i would be delighted to be listed as a co-sponsor and at the appropriate time, happy to move the amendments. >> supervisor melgar: thank you supervisor peskin. if there are no further comments or questions -- did you want to share remarks about the item? >> hi, can you hear me? >> yes. >> the department doesn't have a specific presentation related to this. we just wanted to respectfully and formally request the 90 day extension to allow for a total of 180 days for the historic preservation commission to render the decision. we thank the supervisor's office for taking that under consideration. >> supervisor melgar: thank you. supervior preston. >> supervisor preston: thank you chair melgar and supervisor stefani's office. this is not in our district but very close and we are jealous of the fact that you have this amazing space. and i think these landmarking efforts are important for long-term presentation and all of us have had in our district the loss of theaters, movie

second by peskin. thank you, commissioner peskin. please call the roll. >> clerk: on item 7 -- [roll call] >> clerk: you have ten ayes. the item has approval on its first reading -- final approval on its first reading. >> chair mandelman: thank you, madam clerk. please call the item 8. >> clerk: clerk item 8 is adopt the district 4 mobility study. this is an action item, and i would like to note that we received approximately 70 public comments. >> chair mandelman: i would like to note that the district 4 mobility study report does not include the configuration of the great highway. so this is not a great highway item, and with that, i will invite commissioner mar to make remarks. >> supervisor mar: thank you so much, chair mandelman. and yeah, i just wanted to offer some brief opening remarks before the preparation on the district 4 mobility study. the district that i represent is among the most car dependent in san francisco, and this is the culmination of a years long study on how we can change that. and to that end, i don't think

vice chair peskin? >> supervisor chan: well, chair mandelman, could i just make a clarification about the reason that we're making this motion specifically? i think both commissioner -- >> chair mandelman: if vice chair peskin and commissioner melgar are okay with deferring to you on that -- >> supervisor peskin: i'm talking to commissioner stefani's comments on the coastal commission language. it doesn't have to be in the amendment. i did not make it as part of the amendment. i was just giving some context, so i've spoken. >> chair mandelman: thank you, commissioner peskin. are you okay, commissioner melgar, with commissioner chan jumping you in the queue? i think i saw you indicate okay. >> supervisor chan: thank you, chair mandelman. the recommendation of staff, not only that they have specifically recommended concept three and concept five, but overall in the entire report, they have not studied concept two at all. and by removing the recommendation altogether, this is hard work, and they want us to

>> i agree with you chair peskin that this is an issue that unfortunately has persisted. it's very complex. the task force had suggested reauthorizing for five years. it has been reauthorized at times three years, at times two years. it is quite a lot of work when it comes to reauthorizing. so i do believe additional years would be fine to add to the reauthorizations. >> chairman: if on item number pouchlt, we were to move the reauthorization date from 24 to 2026, will that be substantive or not? >> no, that would not be substantive, but if i may, i would like to like to add on why that sunset date is there. and that's because under the board's rules, there are rules about regular meetings of subordinate bodies and the rules say the ellening legislation shall also include the qualifications of each member, the length of terms of appointments and the sunset clause not to exceed three years. so that is in the bortd's rules of order. of course, the board may be ordinance exceed that limit, but it is really what we use as a default and where the board seeks to establish a bod

peskin.he minutes, [roll call] there are eleven ayes. >> president walton: without objection. the minutes will be approved after public comment as presented. madam clerk. let's go to the consent agenda items 1 through 7. >> clerk: items 1 through 7 are on consent. these items are considered to be routine. if a member objects an item may be removed and considered separately. >> president walton: thank you, colleagues, anyone wish to sever any items? i don't see anyone. please call the roll on items 1 through 7. >> clerk: on items 1 through 7, [roll call] >> clerk: there are 11 ayes. >> president walton: without objection, these ordinances are passed on the first reading and these resolutions are adopted unanimously. madam clerk, please call unfinished business, item number 8. >> clerk: item 8 is an ordinance to amend the administrative code to prohibit landlords for nonpayment of rental that was not paid due to the covid-19 pandemic provided the tenant has paid at least 25% of the rent owned t

supervisor peskin? >> supervisor peskin: thank you.side bodies, i serve on the bay conservation and development commission which regulates development in the bay and within 100 feet of the shoreline for the nine counties. it's a 27-member commission with a half century of history. we met on may 6, 2021 and discussed all sorts of regional decisions. we received a briefing on the policies of the san francisco water front special area plan which was first adopted in 1975 and amended in the year 2000. which amendments resulted in the creation of a number of open spaces along the water front. on june 17th, we received a briefing regarding mixed use development and discussed as an informational item, that proposed projects consistency or lack there of with the public trust doctrine that established bay conservation and development commission. i served on the san francisco restoration authority. that is the body that distributes the $25 million per year in the $12 per parcel measure aa parcel tax for the nine counties. we discussed the geogra

i would like to thank supervisor peskin for this opportunity. i think part of our calls to provide assistance to immigrants entrepreneurs thinking this would be a great opportunity to continue our effort in making sure that our families, they have the income needed to be providing technical assistance to families to formulize and realize businesses into meet all the requirements that the city has for them to continue doing business in the city. we really appreciate this effort and thank you supervisor peskin for this opportunity. >> : thank you. next speaker. >> : hello. i work at fisherman's wharf. i'm calling to voice my support to acquire permits. it's not fair to the vendors who pay for permits and employees. the city needs to protect the legal vendors and put a stop to the illegal vending. we need your help to support this program and thank you for listening. >> : thank you so much. next speaker. >> : hi. this is john. i'm a property manager in fisherman's wharf. thank you for this piece of legislation. i just want to say i think this shoul