, oh you want to go after me, supervisor peskin, me, chan. >> why don't we start with supervisor peskin, it looks like everybody else withdrew their name. >> thank you, president and thank you supervisor ronen for that offer. dating back to 2019 when most of you members of the board at the time, supported the creation of new section of chapter 19 b which was a provision that actually not a san francisco first, i think we were the 7th municipality in the state of california to adopt legislation which required all of our, how they used it for what purposes and what the protocols around the use of that februarying knowledging are ranging from who the data is shared with, what city employees have access to the data how long the data is stored, a series of used policies and over the intervening years, albeit, we had a little bit of covid and a little bit of shut down in all of things, in thed middle of it, some two dozen have brought us about surveillance fiment that none of us knew we had. sf it's been a transparent that makes the dpept think about these technology and think about what is a

we appreciate all the work the committee president peskin and chair peskin and supervisor chan done regarding the policy. submitted bite sfpd but we continue to have occurrence. take time to examine all the consequences of the massive changes and julie tran stated the study impact in other jurisdiction. you must vet the potential unintended consequences and civil liberty impacts of sweeping surveillance tools such as live monitoring and exonerating evidence is not destroyed as a result of the policy. this is extremely important changes in san francisco and we urge to you take time to [inaudible]. >> thank you. >> move on to the next caller. >> hello i'm a resident of district 7. i want to ask how exact low is the ability to conduct live surveillance curtail crime limp is no data backing this. over all i'm suspicious of sfpd to conduct to access third party cameras. why is the concern system insufficient this has in the been addressed i urge prierzs to take time and question the logic behind implementing without further amendments. thank you. >> next caller. >> hello i'm leah and i'm [inaudibl

, oh you want to go after me, supervisor peskin, me, chan. >> why don't we start with supervisor peskin, it looks like everybody else withdrew their name. >> thank you, president and thank you supervisor ronen for that offer. dating back to 2019 when most of you members of the board at the time, supported the creation of new section of chapter 19 b which was a provision that actually not a san francisco first, i think we were the 7th municipality in the state of california to adopt legislation which required all of our, how they used it for what purposes and what the protocols around the use of that februarying knowledging are ranging from who the data is shared with, what city employees have access to the data how long the data is stored, a series of used policies and over the intervening years, albeit, we had a little bit of covid and a little bit of shut down in all of things, in thed middle of it, some two dozen have brought us about surveillance fiment that none of us knew we had. sf it's been a transparent that makes the dpept think about these technology and think about what is a

, oh you want to go after me, supervisor peskin, me, chan. >> why don't we start with supervisor peskin, it looks like everybody else withdrew their name. >> thank you, president and thank you supervisor ronen for that offer. dating back to 2019 when most of you members of the board at the time, supported the creation of new section of chapter 19 b which was a provision that actually not a san francisco first, i think we were the 7th municipality in the state of california to adopt legislation which required all of our, how they used it for what purposes and what the protocols around the use of that februarying knowledging are ranging from who the data is shared with, what city employees have access to the data how long the data is stored, a series of used policies and over the intervening years, albeit, we had a little bit of covid and a little bit of shut down in all of things, in thed middle of it, some two dozen have brought us about surveillance fiment that none of us knew we had. sf it's been a transparent that makes the dpept think about these technology and think about what is a

supervisor peskin. >> thank you. as mrs. madeline and i communicates e mail and not able because i was in rules to follow up with the phone call. relative to monthly parking i don't see, there is, not suggesting change to the rates well? and not be obviously subject to fleckable parking. is that right? >> i will let rob answer this piece. >> good afternoon rob malone mta. there was no mention of our machining low parking policy but since the question kim came up we do have a policy at all garages first of all a couple thing in terms of rates mechanic low rates are set by surveying the local area or competing facilities or lacking this is a facility that it is not have local competition. in that case compare to the other facilities around the city. the other thing we do is close low monitor the balance the equalization moum month lows are using the garage versus transient parkers the daily parkers are using the facility. in the case of this garage. there are only about 25 monthly parkers. out of a facility over 800 stall its

supervisor peskin. chair lee. i would be more than happy and i think i expressed at the last meeting to have it impossibility that the board of supervisors could wave itself. the suggestion you made which would be -- even one step further which is only this body could wave it for the board. it is acceptable. >> thank you. any other. >> i want to make myself clear, i will not vote for this today. unless or because -- the attempt to influence definition is too narrow. and i would choose the commission's current regulation definition of attempt to influence over the definition in this proposed legislation. >> i would say i read that there is dissonance, i understand why we want to wait i'm wondering the time line. if we revise this would we and sends it to the city attorney's office. what is the process. i agree there is no need to delay and say we will edit the regulation but pass this. it makes sense if we draft this to get it right but i want to ask about the time line yoochl madam chair and commissioners as much

vice chair mandelman. >> aye. >> chair peskin. >> aye. jot megz the motion passes >>s next is item 2. a hear to consider appointing 4 members to inclusionary housing committee for terms spiring 3 months after the date the city controller produces the inclusionary affordable housing requires by planning code 415.10. >> not unlike the last item where the voters voted on manage that gave the legislative branch of government ability to make amendments. and this goes back a time depending where you want to start the story about 20 years ago then supervisor mark leno passed the first piece of inclusionary housing legislation in san francisco. it had been i'm looking at the soon to be considered enemy neil to planning mr. braub. it had been a planning department guideline in the 1990's. and early i think in 2001 supervisor leno turned it it section 415 of the planning code this med a requirement to have 10% of the units in buildings over 10 units in size. the boardable at certain rates. that changed over time as markets changed. and hen unfortun

supervisor peskin? >>supervisor aaron peskin: yes, i won't be supporting to send it back and i don't understand the basis for it and will say that this is, i think i have been critical often of appointments not from this body but of appointments that lack the expertise for the seats they are taking and we have many many commissions and task forces that are filled with those and this is the polar opposite. i'm a bit as the very strange to me that we would need more time to consider peter cohen who is well-known to the board and provided expertise and one of the top experts around these very issues, and i think we are lucky that someone of his caliber wants to serve on this technical committee, and not really understanding the basis of more time when it's already been vetted and recommended by the committee. >> thank you so much, supervisor peskin. >> madam clerk, would you call on the motion to send this file back to committee. >>clerk: on the motion to send this file back to committee. [roll call] >> th

supervisor peskin?visor aaron peskin: thank you, president. i would like to acknowledge the budget committee and chair ronen for, this is not just a normal contract, but for asking the questions about the cost over runs that are really quite excessive and also just to put a place marker on items like this where a project has almost doubled in cost from its original projections. to note that this board of supervisors really does not by virtue of the cgmc method have oversight except for in rare circumstances like a contract like this that we can't say no to because we have to add another $55 million or the project won't be done, but i think with this entire dynamic there is more examination by the board of supervisors and i would like to thank them for taking this serious and discharging their duty. thank you, i agree. colleagues, can we take this item same house same call? without objection this item is approved. item 18. >> >>clerk: 18. 220844 [real property lease - aardvark storage unlimited, inc. - 6

supervisor peskin? >>supervisor aaron peskin: thank you for this hearing and thank you to local 2 for being up since 4:00 this morning, to all of you to the director of sfo staff and mr. kevin wesley who i have known along ago from the multi-employer group. we are the landlord. we are the landlord and the charter has very very specific land and we have the unlimited power of inquiry. so show me the leases, the six leases. i will read some of the names in a minute, but before i do that, let's talk about section 9.118 of the charter. that is the provision of the charter that's been around from a quarter of the century from before my time that says that any contract with anticipated revenue of $1 million or more is subject to approval by the board of supervisors. any modification for amendment or termination, even termination of such a contract is subject to approval by the board of supervisors. any modification is subject to the board of supervisors. any lease of ten years or longer in duration even optio

supervisor peskin, do you want to make a motion?>> i would like to move this item to the full board with a positive recommendation. >> and oon that motion peskin. >> aye. >> preston melgar. >> aye. >> peskin. >> aye. >> that passes. any other items in. >> no other items. >> thank you, we are now adjourned. yay! >> good morning and welcome to the first rules committee after our summer recess. today, monday september, 12, 2022 i'm the chair aaron peskin joined by supervisor connie chan. the clerk is victor young. >> board are convening

next up is supervisor peskin. >> thank you, madam clerk.leagues, today i'm introducing a couple of resolutions, one with regard to shark park, city park in san mateo county in pacifica which if all of you saw the article in the chronicle by gary camia was unbeknownst to me and many people as a japanese internment camp during word war two. we know about topaz but didn't realize a city park was the site of an internment camp and this is a resolution urging our recreation and parks department to acknowledge this dark chapter of our history with appropriate interpretive signage onsite and the second resolution is urging our sf mta to enforce against motorized scooters on sidewalks ask clear violation of our existing laws but that's pro live rating and sidewalk fencing and asking sf mta to not allow are permits to be issued for scooters not equipped and the technology has been slow in equipping their four thousand permanent device was that technology and finally colleagues and would like to adjourn in the memory of several individuals, most of w

. >> supervisor peskin? >> present. >> supervisor preston? >> present. >> preston present. >> supervisor ronen? >> present. >> safai? not present. supervisor stephanie? >> present. >> supervisor walton. >> present. >> mr. president, you have a quorum. >> thank you, madam clerk. the san francisco board of supervisors acknowledges that we are on the unseated homeland of the room ramaytush oholone. [land acknowledgement] colleagues please stand with me to cite of pledge of allegiance. ["pledge of allegiance"] >> i would like to action knot the staff after sfgov and we have tom and michael who record each of our meetings and make the transcripts available to the public online. madam clerk, do we have any communications this afternoon >> yes, mr. president. the board of supervisors welcomes the public to the legislative chamber here in room 250 in city hall to advise the board in person or listen to the proceedings. the meeting is airing live on sfgov tv award-winning channel 26, where you may view the computer live stream at www dot sfgov tv dot

supervisor peskin? >>supervisor aaron peskin: yes, i won't be supporting to send it back and i don't understand the basis for it and will say that this is, i think i have been critical often of appointments not from this body but of appointments that lack the expertise for the seats they are taking and we have many many commissions and task forces that are filled with those and this is the polar opposite. i'm a bit as the very strange to me that we would need more time to consider peter cohen who is well-known to the board and provided expertise and one of the top experts around these very issues, and i think we are lucky that someone of his caliber wants to serve on this technical committee, and not really understanding the basis of more time when it's already been vetted and recommended by the committee. >> thank you so much, supervisor peskin. >> madam clerk, would you call on the motion to send this file back to committee. >>clerk: on the motion to send this file back to committee. [roll call] >> th

supervisor peskin?visor aaron peskin: thank you, president. i would like to acknowledge the budget committee and chair ronen for, this is not just a normal contract, but for asking the questions about the cost over runs that are really quite excessive and also just to put a place marker on items like this where a project has almost doubled in cost from its original projections. to note that this board of supervisors really does not by virtue of the cgmc method have oversight except for in rare circumstances like a contract like this that we can't say no to because we have to add another $55 million or the project won't be done, but i think with this entire dynamic there is more examination by the board of supervisors and i would like to thank them for taking this serious and discharging their duty. thank you, i agree. colleagues, can we take this item same house same call? without objection this item is approved. item 18. >> >>clerk: 18. 220844 [real property lease - aardvark storage unlimited, inc. - 6

supervisor peskin. >> item 24. >> thank you supervisor peskin. supervisor melgar. >> i would like to be added to 23 and 24. >> thank you, supervisor melgar. super mar. madam clerk, would you please call the roll on items 22 and 25. >> on 22 and 25, supervisor dorsey, aye, mandelman. aye, supervisor mar, maraye. melgar, aye. peskin, aye, preston, preston aye, ronen, ronen aye, safai, safai, aye. stefani, aye. walton, aye. >> walton aye, and supervisor chan. chan aye, there are 11 ayes. >> thank you, without objection these resolutions are adopted unanimously. please call item number 23. >> clerk: 23 is a resolution hold on my computer froze for a moment. item 23 this is a resolution to support the burrmese people a return to democratic civilian run government. >> thank you, supervisor mar. >> thank you, president walton and mandelman for cosponsoring this resolution and thank you to supervisor melgar for her resolution supporting on march 13. and i want to acknowledge the leaders and organization here in the mermese community. and ron lee, valerie

supervisor peskin. >> item 24. >> thank you supervisor peskin. supervisor melgar. >> i would like to be added to 23 and 24. >> thank you, supervisor melgar. super mar. madam clerk, would you please call the roll on items 22 and 25. >> on 22 and 25, supervisor dorsey, aye, mandelman. aye, supervisor mar, maraye. melgar, aye. peskin, aye, preston, preston aye, ronen, ronen aye, safai, safai, aye. stefani, aye. walton, aye. >> walton aye, and supervisor chan. chan aye, there are 11 ayes. >> thank you, without objection these resolutions are adopted unanimously. please call item number 23. >> clerk: 23 is a resolution hold on my computer froze for a moment. item 23 this is a resolution to support the burrmese people a return to democratic civilian run government. >> thank you, supervisor mar. >> thank you, president walton and mandelman for cosponsoring this resolution and thank you to supervisor melgar for her resolution supporting on march 13. and i want to acknowledge the leaders and organization here in the mermese community. and ron lee, valerie

[gavel] >> and i understand that supervisor peskin is supportive of this license transfer so given that i will make a motion to prepare a resolution determining that license will serve the public convenience or necessity and that we send the resolution forward to the full board with positive recommendation. madam clerk. >> i'm sorry mr. clerk are these coming out committee reports. they should be committee reports. we will also need to [inaudible] that needs to be a committee report. >> okay. okay. >> as a committee report. >> yes. >> on the motion prepare the resolution and send it out of the committee report by supervisor stefani. >> [off mic]. >> aye. >> supervisor melgar absent. chair mar. >> aye. >> there are two aye it is. >> thank you. so this will be sent to the full board as a positive recommendation to the committee report >> and can we rescind the vote for item one to take it as a committee report. >> yes i would make that motion. >> on the motion to rescind. vice chair stefani. aye, melgar absent. chair mar. >> aye. >> there are two ayes. >> okay [gavel] >> and then on the m

please present our moon cakes to supervisor peskin. it's a mini moon cake so don't worry about the calories, okay. [laughter] so, representing -- all right. so, representing the larasa community resource center, we have gabriel or shawn or wendy. i don't know if they are here. if not, then we have carlos representing the labor council, we rise immigration center, so supervisor gordon mar. [applause] thank you. and if -- representing the elderly would give one to shamaka from the mayor's office. and then i think shamann went back to the chamber so we'll bring his box. let's give a big hand to the supervisor's office and mayor's office. [cheers and applause] and then we'll go back to our agenda. it's very hot today. [taking pictures] >> thank you! [indistinct chatter] >> all right. sorry for the interruption but we now, i would like to invite the chair of our immigrant rights commission, ms. celine canelli to say a few words and i have to tell celine, she's very, very supportive of the sf pathway really from the day one since we conceive

vice chair is aaron peskin. with sfgovtv we have mendoza, our clerk is i elijah seaneders and commissioner chan will not attend today. with that, mr. saunders will you call the roll. >> american dorsey. >> commissioner mandelman. >> present. >> commissioner mar. >> (. >> commissioner melgar. >> present. why commissioner peskin. >> present. why commissioner preston. >> present. >> commissioner ronen. >> present. >> commissioner safai. >> absent. >> commissioner stephanie. >> absent. >> commissioner walton. >> present. >> >> stephanie present. great. thank you, mr. clerk. before our next item. i know you have public comment announcement. >> yes, i do. >> for the public interested in participating in the meeting we welcome you in person in the chamber room 250 in city hall or watch chabl channel 26 or 99. streamed live on sfgov.org. for those wish to comment remote dial 415-655-0001 then access code: 2495 385 4046 ##. you will listen for the mote nothing role time when public comment is called press star 3 to be ad

board, i'm raphael and i chair this board and our vice board is aaron peskin and sanders. mr. clerk, will you call the roll. >> [roll call] >> taking roll call. >> [roll call] >> chair we have quorum. >> thank you, mr. clerk. i think you have a public comment announcement. >> i do. for members of the public interested in participating in this board meeting, we welcome your attendance in person and the ledge slaytive chamber, room 250 in city hall or watch cable channel 26 or 99 depending on your provider. or stream the meeting live at www dot sfgov tv dot org. for those wishing to make public comment remotely, the best way to do so is dial 415-655-0001 and when prompted entering access code 24986863170. and then press pound and pound again. you'll be able to listen to the meeting in real time. when public comment is called for the item you wish to speak on, press star three to be added to the queue to speak. do not press star three again or you'll be removed from the queue. when the system says your line is unmuted, the live operator will advise you that you will be allowed tw

commissioner peskin? >> aye. >> commissioner preston? >> aye. >> commissioner ronen? >> aye. >> commissioner safai? >> aye. >> safai aye. commissioner stefani? >> aye. >> commissioner walton? >> aye. >> there are ten ayes and the motion passes. >> thank you, mr. clerk. please call item 4. >> item four, community advisory committee report. this is -- this is an informational item. we have kevin from the t -- >> good evening, commissioners. my name is kevin ortiz, i'm not chair cline but i'm here to provide the update for the san francisco county transportation authorities community advisory committee. and i represent district nine. so, we had, for the july 27th meeting, we had updates on our bylaws as well as ethics training. it was very an informational meeting we did. you know, this last meeting, we ended up having a couple of reports on the obag request, so the one bay area grants and so, there was a lot of discussion particularly around the 16th, 24th and balboa park stations particularly around funding for the design funding for elevators. now, i will say that i m

supervisor peskin, do you want to make a motion?>> i would like to move this item to the full board with a positive recommendation. >> and oon that motion peskin. >> aye. >> preston melgar. >> aye. >> peskin. >> aye. >> that passes. any other items in. >> no other items. >> thank you, we are now adjourned. yay! >> my name is sylvia and i'm the owner of the mexican bistro. we have been in business for 18 years and we first opened on garry street in san francisco, and now we are located in a beautiful historic building. and we are part of the historical building founded in 1776. at the same time as the mission delores in san francisco. (♪♪) our specialty food is food from central mexico. it's a high-end mexican food based on quality and fresh ingredients. we have an amazing chef from yucatÁn and we specialize on molotov, that are made with pumpkin seeds. and we're also known for handmade tortillas and we make our own fresh salsa. and we have cocktails, and we have many in the bar. we have specialty drinks and they are very flavorrable

supervisor peskin, do you want to make a motion?>> i would like to move this item to the full board with a positive recommendation. >> and oon that motion peskin. >> aye. >> preston melgar. >> aye. >> peskin. >> aye. >> that passes. any other items in. >> no other items. >> thank you, we are now adjourned. yay! >> good afternoon, thank you everyone for coming. my name is jeffrey come lin and i'm san francisco's director of transportation. and i'm so grateful to have the secretary, the speaker and the mayor here to celebrate our progress on the central subway. we are joined by local community and i'm grateful to all of you in the local community who who have put up with years of construction and disruption here in the heart of china town but we promise it is going to be worth it. as we sit here i want to action knot the long history it has taken to get here including remembering the earthquake and the demolition of the embarcadero freeway and this project started both as a radical idea and a strong community partnership. in the recov

supervisor peskin, do you want to make a motion? >> i would like to move this item to the full board with a positive recommendation. >> and oon that motion peskin. >> aye. >> preston melgar. >> aye. >> peskin. >> aye. >> that passes. any other items in. >> no other items. >> thank you, we are now adjourned. yay! >> so, welcome everybody. welcome, that's right. give yourselves a hand. we're alive. we are ain't dead, it's no funeral right. it's about saving lives. before i start, i just want to acknowledge speaker of the house and her team for being here. nancy pelosi, thank you. i want to acknowledge our mayor of san francisco, mayor london breed. my sister. [applause] so it's a pleasure to have you here in the alley in the selma and i got acknowledge my brother the chief right there. chief of police, sfpd. originally from la but he's in frisco with us and our new da, my sister, ms. brooks jenkins. thank you. i got to give a shout-out to mom's demand action in the house. the brady campaign, the sftd, all the united playaz here helpin