good ahead. >> thank you chair peskin. really only to express thanks and gratitude to the jefferson and he the mayor's office for sponsoring this. >> there we go. is there public comment on item 3? >> chair peskin before we move on i wanted to be sure that i heard correct low that meet and conifer is in the required >> that is correct. >> yes. >> members who wish to speak on this item and joining in person line up to speak. at this time. for those remote call 415-655-0001 then access code: 2486 917 6560 ## and press star 3 to enter the queue. for those in the queue continue to wait until the system indicated you are unmuted that is your queue to begin your comment. no one in the room for public comment and there is nobody on the phone line on this matter. >> okay. public comment on item 3 is closed. and supervisor mandelman would you like to dot honors? >> i will move we forward this to the full board with positive recommendation. >> roll call. >> to that motion supervisor chan. >> aye. >> chair mandelman. >> aye >> chair

peskin. can i respond to supervisor peskin.i don't want00 eye than completely eviscerates the point of the amendment obviously the mreers always evaluating the point i'm making and when i'm worried about is this the police have never done this in 11 years. we now unearth third degree major discussion. in san francisco. and it is just the way we are going as a society. we are more mech anized, ai. we are -- we are relying more on technology in the society. if we don't require them to use human beings and deescalation first my worry is that it will become the fall back of choice. and so i'm not -- it it is we are saying different thing this is is different amendment. to evaluate is the same as out weighs. it is like -- and using what criteria. there should be a specific criteria and that should be use the other tools first. if those don't work have you this other tool. i think it is a very different amendment and that's i didn't can't agree to it. >> if i may respond, mr. president. and i say this fully acknowledging that i am no

supervisor peskin had a history of [inaudible] supervisor peskin and dorsey must resign it puts our live in danger i yield my time, >> thank you can we hear from our next speaker, please. why i'm jessica i'm here about item 32 [inaudible] i hope you vote on. i'm a sexual >> i will pause your time you mentioned item 22. 32. >> thank you, kindly. >> i moved to the city i was, wear this was a haven for lgbt a + q people i move friday miami tow be only and asexual here and i hope you recognize my expression with this resolution week. >> thank you very much. >> thank you for sharing your comments. welcome. >> i'm brand good win media director for the democratic club cannabis club promoting the wealthier of medical patience and consumers. thank you for unanimous low passing item 4. and post poke any cannabis tax. why did you say item 4? >> yes. it is on the agenda and that's precisely why you can't spoke it had public comment in committee. >> thank you. public comment time. why mr. patrellis, it is your turn. >> before i get started i need the cooperation of sfgovtv what is this again? this is

chair peskin and thank you, supervisor chan. it may be that we should explore that with this and lafco has been a great resource as you say with the some items asthma dam clerk referenced departments may not have been prioritizing them. look forward to conferring with you about that and whether that might be a good fit. i want to briefly touch on just point out 2 things on the issue. of the balance power interpretation here. first of all, to point out, following up on chair peskin's comments and the charter has and section 101 all right and powerhouse city ask county not vested shall be exercises by the board of prierzs that is a catch all that empowered the board of surprises broadly. i would point out this is a central issue. >> the city's charter does not have an exclusivity clause. if you look at united states constitution and the state constitution, they preclude a branch are exercising a power this another branch has this is in the the case in our city charter. so, of the idea this just because you know, buss and trines ar

unless there are objections. >> commissioner peskin. >> vice chair peskin. >> thank you, chair. so -- just to edifiy my colleagues, i'm working with the city attorney in my incarnation as a member of the board of supervisors on city wide legislation which if we finds that to be acceptable as policy i will also bring to the transportation authority that would -- stop the city and county of san francisco and by extension the sfcta from granting funds to or otherwise doing business with 501c4's. >> thank you vice chair peskin. commissioner preston. thank you, chair mandelman. i'm curious if in terms of the existing rowels interested to hear from the city attorney i assume they are approveed form when they come before us. is there a legal concern regarding these grants to -- c4 receiving? we can have our council address that. it would be my inclination without weighing in on the merits of the concerns that were raised the simple matter of courtesy i incline to give us more time to look into any of the issues raised including legal occurrence we may havism intends to bring this back.

unless there are objections. >> commissioner peskin. >> vice chair peskin. >> thank you, chair. just to edifiy my colleagues, i'm working with the city attorney in my incarnation as a member of the board of supervisors on city wide legislation which if we finds that to be acceptable as policy i will also bring to the transportation authority that would -- stop the city and county of san francisco and by extension the sfcta from granting funds to or otherwise doing business with 501c4's. >> thank you vice chair peskin. commissioner preston. thank you, chair mandelman. i'm curious if in terms of the existing rowels interested to hear from the city attorney i assume they are approveed form when they come before us. is there a legal concern regarding these grants to -- c4 receiving? we can have our council address that. it would be my inclination without weighing in on the merits of the concerns that were raised the simple matter of courtesy i incline to give us more time to look into any of the issues raised including legal occurrence we may havism intends to bring this back. give

chair peskin and thank you, supervisor chan. it may be that we should explore that with this and lafco has been a great resource as you say with the some items asthma dam clerk referenced departments may not have been prioritizing them. look forward to conferring with you about that and whether that might be a good fit. i want to briefly touch on just point out 2 things on the issue. of the balance power interpretation here. first of all, to point out, following up on chair peskin's comments and the charter has and section 101 all right and powerhouse city ask county not vested shall be exercises by the board of prierzs that is a catch all that empowered the board of surprises broadly. i would point out this is a central issue. >> the city's charter does not have an exclusivity clause. if you look at united states constitution and the state constitution, they preclude a branch are exercising a power this another branch has this is in the the case in our city charter. so, of the idea this just because you know, buss and trines ar

unless there are objections. >> commissioner peskin. >> vice chair peskin. >> thank you, chair.st to edifiy my colleagues, i'm working with the city attorney in my incarnation as a member of the board of supervisors on city wide legislation which if we finds that to be acceptable as policy i will also bring to the transportation authority that would -- stop the city and county of san francisco and by extension the sfcta from granting funds to or otherwise doing business with 501c4's. >> thank you vice chair peskin. commissioner preston. thank you, chair mandelman. i'm curious if in terms of the existing rowels interested to hear from the city attorney i assume they are approveed form when they come before us. is there a legal concern regarding these grants to -- c4 receiving? we can have our council address that. it would be my inclination without weighing in on the merits of the concerns that were raised the simple matter of courtesy i incline to give us more time to look into any of the issues raised including legal occurrence we may havism intends to bring this back. give --

unless there are objections. >> commissioner peskin. >> vice chair peskin. >> thank you, chair. so -- just to edifiy my colleagues, i'm working with the city attorney in my incarnation as a member of the board of supervisors on city wide legislation which if we finds that to be acceptable as policy i will also bring to the transportation authority that would -- stop the city and county of san francisco and by extension the sfcta from granting funds to or otherwise doing business with 501c4's. >> thank you vice chair peskin. commissioner preston. thank you, chair mandelman. i'm curious if in terms of the existing rowels interested to hear from the city attorney i assume they are approveed form when they come before us. is there a legal concern regarding these grants to -- c4 receiving? we can have our council address that. it would be my inclination without weighing in on the merits of the concerns that were raised the simple matter of courtesy i incline to give us more time to look into any of the issues raised including legal occurrence we may havism intends to bring this back.

thank you chair peskin. >> thank you supervisor chan. approximate i'm not prepared vote on this just boy virtue of the fact i believe mrs. li said she does not consider hergz to fit the requirement which mior may not apply to her of being a frequency, regular muni rider. nor does she claim that she fits the professional experience. i would like to have answers to those threshold 8 a102 questions that are up to this board to determine wlo we have the right compliment set forth in the charter. i would after public comment like to continue this merit to the call of the chair. having established that there is no time frame which we must act. and i understand that mrs. lieshgs are li will return in a month. so may be we can interview her in person or may be the mayor will reconsider a suggestion by supervisor channel and i concur with the thrust of the comment this is supervisor chan articulated why den we open item 5 up for public comment. >> yes. members of the public who wish to speak and join nothing person line up to speak. for those rem

supervisor peskin. i. supervisor preston. >> madam clerk please call the roll on item 28. supervisor ronen. i. supervisor safai. i. >> supervisor stefani. >> i. >> supervisor walton. >> i. >> supervisor chan. i. supervisor dorsi. i. supervisor mar. i. supervisor melgar. i. supervisor peskin. i. supervisor preston. >> i. >> preston i. there are ten is. >> thank you without objection this motion is approved unanimously. welcome back supervisor mandelman. madam clerk, let's go to roll call for introductions. we will come back to item 28. >> first up for roll call on introductions is supervisor supervisor ronen. i. supervisor safai. i. >> supervisor stefani. >> today i will ask to close today's meeting in memory of lorraine marie -- she died on saturday at 81. she is the mother of our lieu continue ant governor. born march 16th 1940 elaine was a proud greek american. she held deeply the values of persistence, kindness and patriot i am and instilled those values in her children. elaine was a teacher. above all

>> aye. >> peskin?aye. >> the motion passes without objection. >> next item, please. >> -- next on the agenda is item no. two, ordinance amending the administrative code to permit members of the san francisco employees' retirement system (sfers) to designate special needs trusts as retirement beneficiaries in certain circumstances, and to specify requirements for those trusts. >> supervisor safai is the lead sponsor of this measure and a member of the retirement board. supervisor safai, welcome, good morning. >> thank you, chair. thank you, colleagues. colleagues, today i'm presenting legislation to change the administrative code to allow for special needs trust as retirement beneficiaries. i will give a brief overview of the legislation and turn it over to staff, the retirement system to elaborate further. as the president of the retirement system, we have a responsibility to our members to update the rules and regulations when it's necessary. last year, a member who was planning their estate pointed o

i'm supervisor melgar chair joined by vice chair supervisor preston and supervisor peskin. the committee clerk today is erika major and i would like to acknowledge jason gold and janet at sfgovtv for staff thanksgiving meeting. >> do you have announcements? >> the board of supervisors and committees are convening hybrid meeting for in person comment and remote access and public comment via phone. board rescuizes equal access is essential and taking public comment as follows. first taken on each item. those in person will be allowed to speak first and we will take those waiting on the phone line. for those watching channel 26, 28, 78 or 99, and sfgov.org the public call in number is streaming the number is 415-655-0001. that is 415-655-0001. and you enter access code: 2484 878 4906##. when connected you will hear the meeting discussions but muted and in listening mode only. when your item come up and public comment is called those in person should be lineup to your right and those on the phone line dial star 3 to be added to the queue if you are on your phone turn down your

supervisor peskin. >> thank you. clothes i have 3 resolutions for introduction today. one with regard to the ethicky commission backlog. of mandatory audits of public low financed local campaigns as well as lobbyist audits. it was revealed since 2014 the wh the campaign conduct code was amended by daved chiou requiring the commission to audit one lobbyist per year. they have audited 8 years later zero. to their credit 6 are under way. in the 2016 election cycle, the mandatory required audits of public low financed campaigns were finish in the 14 months in the 2018 cycle they were finished no later than 23 months after the campaign when it got to 2019, 2020 will not be complete their own submission. this is -- justice delayed it is justice denied supposed to be transparent i want to thank the cosponsored of the resolution urging ethices to get rid of their become log by working with the city controller's city service audit division. this is a core function i want to thank supervisor preston, chan, mandelman, ronen and safai for cosponsorship and safai for suggestion per

. >> chair peskin. >> aye. >> the motion passes. we are adjourned. >> good afternoon this meeting will come to order. welcome to the october 31, 2022 regular meeting of land use and transportation of the san francisco board of supervisors. happy halloween. i'm supervisor melgar chair joined by vice chair supervisor preston and supervisor peskin. the committee clerk today is erika major and i would like to acknowledge jason gold and janet at sfgovtv for staff thanksgiving meeting. >> do you have announcements? >> the board of supervisors and committees are convening hybrid meeting for in person comment and remote access and public comment via phone. board rescuizes equal access is essential and taking public comment as follows. first taken on each item. those in person will be allowed to speak first and we will take those waiting on the phone line. for those watching channel 26, 28, 78 or 99, and sfgov.org the public call in number is streaming the number is 415-655-0001. that is 415-655-0001. and you enter access code: 2484 878 4906

supervisor chan. >> thank you chair peskin. >> preston, peskin, it is all good. >> i'm sorry (inaudible) >> i have much more followers on twitter. >> i concur with your sentiment chair peskin and about just overwhelming right now the appointees on this body is women. i also see that there is a vacant seat that is a mayoral appointment but love to encourage the mayor's office to consider ms.- >> the vacant seat is the seat we just filled with mr. lambert. >> that was number 5? >> which i think would make him the only other male out of 9. >> in deed. okay. >> vice chair mandelman. >> one of the items where i don't love being on the rules committee. both of these candidates are excellent. my staff had the opportunity to talk to mr. crawford. very impressed. we haven't had the opportunity to talk directly to ms. milton but heard very good things about her so i could support either of these applicants. >> alright. of course there will be future opportunities on this body and other bodies that work for our children and families, so i will make the difficult choice and make a motion to send mr

so, thank you supervisor peskin for bringing up the language. i think we recall comparris apples to oranges and people like to look back on election results and say -- member who campaigned for the no on i campaign and the yes on j campaign these are what we are talking about today is different. i think that you know -- i am somebody who bikes every where. and i how we go about doing it is important temperature is important to people in my district and we heard from supervisor chan it is different to put people in her district as well. it does bum me out supervisor mar when i hear you say you have been working on this for 2 years. you and i had 3 conversations about great highway. one when we came wurp a compromise, 2 when you asked me to schedule this prior to the election. which i respectfully turned down. and then when you asked meet hours worked for me. i told you they did not quite i had questions. after that there was no attempt to negotiate or comto consensus and i don't think that happened with supervisor chan either although i cannot sp

supervisor chan. >> thank you chair peskin. >> preston, peskin, it is all good. >> i'm sorry (inaudible) >> i have much more followers on twitter. >> i concur with your sentiment chair peskin and about just overwhelming right now the appointees on this body is women. i also see that there is a vacant seat that is a mayoral appointment but love to encourage the mayor's office to consider ms.- >> the vacant seat is the seat we just filled with mr. lambert. >> that was number 5? >> which i think would make him the only other male out of 9. >> in deed. okay. >> vice chair mandelman. >> one of the items where i don't love being on the rules committee. both of these candidates are excellent. my staff had the opportunity to talk to mr. crawford. very impressed. we haven't had the opportunity to talk directly to ms. milton but heard very good things about her so i could support either of these applicants. >> alright. of course there will be future opportunities on this body and other bodies that work for our children and families, so i will make the difficult choice and make a motion to send mr

i'm supervisor melgar chair joined by vice chair supervisor preston and supervisor aaron peskin. the committee clerk is erika major and like to acknowledge matthew and [inaudible] at sfgovtv for staff thanksgiving meeting. >> the board of supervisors and committees are convening hybrid meetings allow in person upon attention and remote access via phone. board recognizes equal access is essential and take public commentace follows, on each item on the agenda. those in person will speak first and then you will take those on the remote line. for those watching channel 26, 28, 78 or 99, and sfgov.org, the upon public call in number is streaming. the number is 415-655-0001. again, 415-655-0001. and access code: 2482 802 4703 ##. when connected you will heart discussion but muted. when your item of interest come up and public comment is called those in person line up to bear right and those on the phone line dial star 3 to be added to the queue fundamentor your phone turn down your television and all listening device. we will take public comment from those in person first and go to our

supervisor peskin. thank you. and let mow say to all of my colleagues i appreciate the tone and tenor of the points and conversations. and i actually thank you the electorates in here this is what planning is electric for and why supervisor mar scheduled this we all have shared desires about protecting our existing tenants and population this if i can state t have learned lessons of redevelopment from decades ago and don't want to repoe while we seek more density there seems to be a shared desire and understanding that the need is need for affordable and extreme low affordable and moderate income. y don't think there is anybody jumping up and down meeting the met boy 1 and a half times luxury housing need. and fauk a bit about how we got here. which is many of the things this san francisco has evolved over time inclusion or affordable have been aimed on the local level at addressing the need we all share. so ab7 and the voters put their money where their mug is many time in general obligation bonds which is amaze

n moved by peskin, is there a second? seconded by melgar. mr. clerk, call the roll. >> commissioner chen. >> aye.an. >> chen aye mend theman. >> aye.air. >> aye dd commissioner melgar. >> aye commissioner preston aye. >> commissioner ronen aye commissioner safai? commissioner safai. safai absent. commissioner walton. >> aye. >> there are eight ayes. the consent agenda is approved. >> aye. >> look there are nine ayes, th consent agenda is approved. >> did you get me? >> we got you. >> i kept saying, i don't know what happened. >> thank you. with that, mr. saunders, please call item 8. 8. >> sf school access plan update. this is informational. >> we have david long presenting. >> we do. >> all right. i'm sharing my slides. >> thank you chair and good morning i'm david long transportation planner presenting on school access plan. next slide. so, here is our agenda today. the school access plan supported by a planning grant and funds from commissioner mar's district 4 office. i will start with study goals and out reach for discussions findings from

good ahead. >> thank you chair peskin. really only to express thanks and gratitude to the jefferson and he the mayor's office for sponsoring this. >> there we go. is there public comment on item 3? >> chair peskin before we move on i wanted to be sure that i heard correct low that meet and conifer is in the required >> that is correct. >> yes. >> members who wish to speak on this item and joining in person line up to speak. at this time. for those remote call 415-655-0001 then access code: 2486 917 6560 ## and press star 3 to enter the queue. for those in the queue continue to wait until the system indicated you are unmuted that is your queue to begin your comment. no one in the room for public comment and there is nobody on the phone line on this matter. >> okay. public comment on item 3 is closed. and supervisor mandelman would you like to dot honors? >> i will move we forward this to the full board with positive recommendation. >> roll call. >> to that motion supervisor chan. >> aye. >> chair mandelman. >> aye >> chair