and i want to thank president peskin for his early cosponsorship. he has been involved in this legislation as limp thank you very much. >> thank you. miss herrera will you read the amendment. or audrey. when am do that? audrey? great. >> okay. >> and now audrey from planning department. >> thank you. >> good afternoon, supervisors historic preservation and planning commission heard this item in january and almosted 've recommended prove with modifications. as miss herrera stated most incorporated today. one additional recommendation the planning commission recommendd that was not included in the draft but this supervisor ronen's office is supportive of and hope you make today is to require the department will planning upon department record notices of violation where a penalty will be assessed against title of the property. the commission is recommend thanksgiving they want to ensure this potential new property owner before they purchase the property and the title is transferred is aware of outstanding monetary penalties or any outstanding violation

president peskin du want to say something before? >> go ahead. >> i don't know what you are going to say i tell you what i was going to say in the intervening week, i heard from one of the early adopters of adu's who my office worked with for many years noted that there have been other changes in state law that this does not conform to that arguablely if adopted part of this legislation would allow for more adu's and as importantly more rent controlled adu's specific low the state mrau would allow detached up to 18 feet in height as to the 16 feet and allow 2 rather twhoon adu's in a detached structure in a rear yard. when accompanied by a multifemale residence didn't this is accounts for one unit compared to 2. if the building is rent controlled they would be rent controlled. for i thought may be we could incorporate those into those changes in this and further conform state law changes i think became effective i know at the beginning of the year and this i think this legislation may begin it was introduced back in august, not have

good afternoon board board president peskin. my name is eric, i live in district 2 in the marina here to thank supervisor preston for introducing the resolution today around vision zero and unsafe streets which i think are very urgent matter. we lost 37 people to traffic violence last year. the most deadly year we had since 2014 when we adopted vision zero. traffic deaths in this city are a solvable problem and know what we need to do to be able to stop them. we need lower speeds and we need enforcement of traffic laws. we simply have chosen not to make that a priority. i am begging you supervisors to pass the resolution today and hold our government feet to the fire on this and take the steps to insure we achieve the goal of ending traffic deaths by next year. thank you very much. >> thank you for your comments. next speaker, please. >> my name is nancy arbuckle in district 3 a senior and pedestrian and member of walk sf. i also want to thank supervisor preston for introducing resolution giving vision zero and unsafe streets th

supervisor peskin. >> thank you. and i askedo of those questions off line and have answers i thought they should be asked for the record. relative to the rubric in san francisco has been since you first proposed this in 2003 and failed. the luof san francisco before the state started meddling in preempting reason control has been the local requirement -- and and it is my belief that we the extent the state mandated program preempts our local reason control no longer applies with the state program is ouzed. would you like to say that for the referred in so we can point to sacramento with the promote gesture. owen the adu's approved under our local program have the ability to impose rent control. hapercentage of adu's approved are done under the local program and rent control opposed to the state program? >> good afternoon natalityia with planning staff. billsod data about 85% of the built adu's done through the local program and subject to rent control the remaining 15% has been approved under the state program. we ha

chair megafrm supervisors peskin and preston. happy new year. we are joined on the phone by michael lennon and gregory from the d. public works and have a few slides to illustrate the out come of the proposed ordinance. >> give a baptist statistic to where the program is currently. in light of this transition we are moving through and additional resources and grants available to shared space. shared spaces take place in the out doors in public realm. we are transitioning private lots permits and on vacant lots to out of the shared spaces program to the planning department's temporary and cu authorization permits. we had an administrative dead line for pandemic permittees to mitt an application for post pandemic permit due to the out roach and engage am work our communication and public education manager we saw the vast will majority submit with an application. there are 350 we have yet to hear from. we are dunning efforts to roach the folks through phone banking and activities to verify if they will operate after the pan dem and i can provide pa

>> thank you, president peskin. i would like to include california assembly chair regional jones sawyer, california appropriation chair chris hold on, after california speaker anthony rendon for a copy of this resolution. >> motion to amend made by supervisor walton, is there a second? second by supervisor mandelman. we'll take that on the amount, same house same call. madam clerk, do we have anymore business. >> clerk: that does conclude the business for today. >> and i will note that there are no in memoira and we are adjourned. as latinos we are unified in some ways and incredibly diverse in others and this exhibit really is an exploration of nuance in how we present those ideas. ♪♪ our debts are not for sale. >> a piece about sanctuary and how his whole family served in the army and it's a long family tradition and these people that look at us as foreigners, we have been here and we are part of america, you know, and we had to reinforce that. i have been cure rating here for about 18 year. we started with a tabl

i want to thank commissioner peskin president peskin. jessy is back our riprogram manager to present this item. >> thank you. good morning, commissioners. jessy rail program manager i'm happy to be here to present the very last set of allocations from the prospect circumstance program. these 3 pertain to the rail extension of projects i want to also add my thanks to deputy director well fortand her team for their work on requests andoir staff partners at joint power's authority. the. program includes initiatives san francisco the center piece saturday rail extension known portal. the dtx is lead by tjpa and bring high speed rail to the heart of downtown. the fourth and [inaudible] rail yard site where caltrain terminates and provides storage from a portion of the float. caltrain is leading a buildings case process to study the long-term future of the rail yard site. transportation authority leading project planning for the pennsylvania avenue extension project. it is san francisco's preferred alignment to the corridor through the city by

. >> supervisor peskin. why present. >> supervisor preston. >> present. >> supervisor ronen. >> present. why supervisor safai. >> not present. >> supervisor stefani. >> present. >> supervisor walton. >> present. >> mr. president, you have a quorum >> thank you, madam clerk the san francisco board supervisors acknowledges we are on the unseed an cest roll home land of the ramaytush ohlone who are the original inhabitants of the san francisco pel anyone slam as the stewards of this land and in accordance with their traditions the ramaytush ohlone have never ceded, lost nor forgotten their respondents as their care takes and all people who is reside in their traditional territory. we benefit from living and working on their home land. we wish to pay our respects acknowledging then cest cors and irrelevant tifs of the recommend ram community and affirming their sofr reason rights at first peoples. join me in the pledge. >>[pledge of allegiance] are there communications? >> yes, mr. president this meeting of the

president peskin? to continue it next week supervisor melgar, supervisor peskin. >> aye >> supervisor preston. >> aye >> supervisor melgar. >> aye. yop that motion passes. thank you. thank you. >> so let's now go to item 4, please. >> ordinance amending the planning code and zoning ma'am to add the village special use district adjacent to 56 julian at 80 julian and making appropriate findings. member his wish to ment on item 4, call 415-655-0001, aceess code: 2491 233 7925 ##. and if you have not done so press star 3. madam chair >> thank you. this is exciting. we have alex west off from planning who will make a presentation for us. we have peter brat from friendship house to present and suzanne brown from equity community builders and makal press. >> thank you. >> and i believe we have slides for this f. we can pull them up. >> we are working on pulling them up. just a second. >> so, good afternoon, supervisors. alex west off, planning staff. the item buffer would amend the planning code to create the

. >> supervisor peskin. why present. >> supervisor preston. >> present. >> supervisor ronen. >> present. why supervisor safai. >> not present. >> supervisor stefani. >> present. >> supervisor walton. >> present. >> mr. president, you have a quorum >> thank you, madam clerk the san francisco board supervisors acknowledges we are on the unseed an cest roll home land of the ramaytush ohlone who are the original inhabitants of the san francisco pel anyone slam as the stewards of this land and in accordance with their traditions the ramaytush ohlone have never ceded, lost nor forgotten their respondents as their care takes and all people who is reside in their traditional territory. we benefit from living and working on their home land. we wish to pay our respects acknowledging then cest cors and irrelevant tifs of the recommend ram community and affirming their sofr reason rights at first peoples. join me in the pledge. >>[pledge of allegiance] are there communications? >> yes, mr. president this meeting of the

commissioner peskin vice chair melgar. >> thank you, chair mandelman and thank you supervisor peskin i'm treed have that conversation. i think that you know we want to incent rise when we want to see in terms of behavior and right you in we have our municipal and he bart in a facing a fiscal cliff and -- car driving back to where it was prepandemic even though ridership in municipal and he bart lagged far. it is krez it me that you can come up from san mateo for free but you have to pay for bart. and that's the system that we set up. and so i am ready to have this conversation we are behind. not just other counties in the bay area but the east coast. so i -- will support what the staff is doing what i would ask is that we pay attention to the operational details. because you know i think this for something like this to work it has to be easy. we will get lots of push back from the public. has to be easily explainable. i would encourage us not to have a complicated system to try to as much as possible leverage when we have in clipper. come other regional frameworks. so that we can be

supervisor peskin. >> thank you chair walton. colleagues, i rise to remake the motion that i made in committee that failed to change this from a motion to approve the nominee to a motion to reject the nominee for the reasons that i stated in committee. the historic preservation commission of san francisco plays a very important role for the-about 1 percent of the built land mass and built environment in a handful of cases even things that are not built like some open spaces and park s. it is the body that reviews potential landmark designations, potential historic district designations, and deals with the issuance of certificates of appropriateness when people want to demolish or alter them. many years starting in the late 1960's san francisco was at the leading edge of historic preservation in urban america, and at that time pioneered the landmark preservation advisory board, but by the end of my second term in 2007, 2008 san francisco was behind the times. cities around the country had full-fledged commissions that dealt with h

. >> thank you, chair peskin. i want to thank you for leading on this, i'm proud to be your cosponsor on this and i will reiterate that all we've heard is clean and safe. people want clean and safe more than anything in the city. constituents in the downtown from bay view to richmond, everybody is looking for clean and safe. we had a hearing from the department of public works last year, historic vacancies somewhere between 20 and 30%, i think it's no coincidence having a short staff contributes to the condition of our streets. the i think i like is it allows a pathway for temporary workers to move into those positions and we're working with the department with local 261 to create pathways for placements. so i want to work with director shore and i'm happy to support this supplemental today and believe it correlates with our previous proposal for safety as well. thank you. >> thank you, assumes safai i will add, that as we're trying to be attempt driven that unlike the calls for service that have dropped from almo

supervisor peskin. >> thank you chair walton. colleagues, i rise to remake the motion that i made in committee that failed to change this from a motion to approve the nominee to a motion to reject the nominee for the reasons that i stated in committee. the historic preservation commission of san francisco plays a very important role for the-about 1 percent of the built land mass and built environment in a handful of cases even things that are not built like some open spaces and park s. it is the body that reviews potential landmark designations, potential historic district designations, and deals with the issuance of certificates of appropriateness when people want to demolish or alter them. many years starting in the late 1960's san francisco was at the leading edge of historic preservation in urban america, and at that time pioneered the landmark preservation advisory board, but by the end of my second term in 2007, 2008 san francisco was behind the times. cities around the country had full-fledged commissions that dealt with h

. >> thank you, chair peskin. i want to thank you for leading on this, i'm proud to be your cosponsor on this and i will reiterate that all we've heard is clean and safe. people want clean and safe more than anything in the city. constituents in the downtown from bay view to richmond, everybody is looking for clean and safe. we had a hearing from the department of public works last year, historic vacancies somewhere between 20 and 30%, i think it's no coincidence having a short staff contributes to the condition of our streets. the i think i like is it allows a pathway for temporary workers to move into those positions and we're working with the department with local 261 to create pathways for placements. so i want to work with director shore and i'm happy to support this supplemental today and believe it correlates with our previous proposal for safety as well. thank you. >> thank you, assumes safai i will add, that as we're trying to be attempt driven that unlike the calls for service that have dropped from almo

good afternoon board board president peskin. my name is eric, i live in district 2 in the marina here to thank supervisor preston for introducing the resolution today around vision zero and unsafe streets which i think are very urgent matter. we lost 37 people to traffic violence last year. the most deadly year we had since 2014 when we adopted vision zero. traffic deaths in this city are a solvable problem and know what we need to do to be able to stop them. we need lower speeds and we need enforcement of traffic laws. we simply have chosen not to make that a priority. i am begging you supervisors to pass the resolution today and hold our government feet to the fire on this and take the steps to insure we achieve the goal of ending traffic deaths by next year. thank you very much. >> thank you for your comments. next speaker, please. >> my name is nancy arbuckle in district 3 a senior and pedestrian and member of walk sf. i also want to thank supervisor preston for introducing resolution giving vision zero and unsafe streets th

good afternoon board board president peskin. my name is eric, i live in district 2 in the marina here to thank supervisor preston for introducing the resolution today around vision zero and unsafe streets which i think are very urgent matter. we lost 37 people to traffic violence last year. the most deadly year we had since 2014 when we adopted vision zero. traffic deaths in this city are a solvable problem and know what we need to do to be able to stop them. we need lower speeds and we need enforcement of traffic laws. we simply have chosen not to make that a priority. i am begging you supervisors to pass the resolution today and hold our government feet to the fire on this and take the steps to insure we achieve the goal of ending traffic deaths by next year. thank you very much. >> thank you for your comments. next speaker, please. >> my name is nancy arbuckle in district 3 a senior and pedestrian and member of walk sf. i also want to thank supervisor preston for introducing resolution giving vision zero and unsafe streets th

supervisor pes con. >> peskin, aye. supervisor preston, no. and supervisor ro non. >> aye. >> and ro non, 7 aye sxz 4 nos with supervisor walton, chan, melgar and preston voting no. >> this ordinance is finally passed, next item. >> clerk: item 4, this is the ordinance to extend through fiscal year 2027 through 28. the temporary suspensions of the application of the business registration and fee requirement to transportation networks and taxi drivers. >> roll call. >> clerk: on item 4, safai, aye. stefani, aye, walton, walton aye, supervisor chan, chan aye, supervisor dorsey, dorsey aye, eengrdio aye. melgar, aye, walton, aye. supervisor preston. preston aye, and supervisor ronen. ronen, aye, there are 11 ayes. >> this ordinance is passed on first reading. next item. >> clerk: item this is 5 to authorize the department of public health to solicit donation to see sorry the opening of safe consumption sites. >> same house, same call, the resolution is adopted. next item. >> clerk: ideal 6 to establish at 10.6 billion the appropriation limit for

supervisor pes con. >> peskin, aye. supervisor preston, no. and supervisor ro non. >> aye. >> and ro non, 7 aye sxz 4 nos with supervisor walton, chan, melgar and preston voting no. >> this ordinance is finally passed, next item. >> clerk: item 4, this is the ordinance to extend through fiscal year 2027 through 28. the temporary suspensions of the application of the business registration and fee requirement to transportation networks and taxi drivers. >> roll call. >> clerk: on item 4, safai, aye. stefani, aye, walton, walton aye, supervisor chan, chan aye, supervisor dorsey, dorsey aye, eengrdio aye. melgar, aye, walton, aye. supervisor preston. preston aye, and supervisor ronen. ronen, aye, there are 11 ayes. >> this ordinance is passed on first reading. next item. >> clerk: item this is 5 to authorize the department of public health to solicit donation to see sorry the opening of safe consumption sites. >> same house, same call, the resolution is adopted. next item. >> clerk: ideal 6 to establish at 10.6 billion the appropriation limit for

thank you, president peskin. a quick question on am the we talked about the 10% that are still out there. what has the department done so we don't back slide on 90 percent still in compliance? sustain at is a part of our object itch. in measures require sustain act i will ask director mc guire and sergeant rivera to talk about this what this looks like t. is built in compliance measures. some things we revisit and the other thing because of just the dgo really aggressive revision scheduling. use of force. we have to revisit that that is tier one. dgo. revisit that every year to make adjustment this is is new and the right thing to do but tell lead to sustain abltd to keep our policies irrelevant voluntary and not another 20 or 30 years before we resunrise this policy. policing changes and changing now quick are then and there it has. it is built in the metrics of what we greed to and if you read them in detail they are measures that are baked in this we agreed to. thank you. seeing no other members on the roster

and also want to introduce a resolution along with supervisor ronen, supervisor peskin, president peskin and supervisor chan. i'm introducing this resolution, committing the 50th anniversary of chinese progressive association. 50 years ago, in 1972 for justice and since then, cp a has developed and activated generations of new leaders to build power with other marginized community and transform living and working conditions for working class families in san francisco. they also have had a long history of building racial solidarity between communities and san francisco to make sure that working families can continue to call their san francisco their home. cp a will have their formal 50th anniversary event on april first. and last i'm introduced a resolution in support of a b912 funding violence known as safe act by assembly member reggie sawyer. into programs that reduce violence, provide diversion opportunities and deliver critical support including mental health, education, and vocational services. creating safe spaces during peek times plays a crucial role and diversion outcome. a b912

supervisor peskin. >> thank you chair walton.to remake the motion that i made in committee that failed to change this from a motion to approve the nominee to a motion to reject the nominee for the reasons that i stated in committee. the historic preservation commission of san francisco plays a very important role for the-about 1 percent of the built land mass and built environment in a handful of cases even things that are not built like some open spaces and park s. it is the body that reviews potential landmark designations, potential historic district designations, and deals with the issuance of certificates of appropriateness when people want to demolish or alter them. many years starting in the late 1960's san francisco was at the leading edge of historic preservation in urban america, and at that time pioneered the landmark preservation advisory board, but by the end of my second term in 2007, 2008 san francisco was behind the times. cities around the country had full-fledged commissions that dealt with historic preservation

was this you supervisor peskin? >> i think this was tom. >> i remember that happening once and in my time in this building i was curious to know if you had any. it does in the happen often but you know it is -- not just interior it is is also very irrelevant van with objects and things like mourls and feet have been crucial. we worked preserve and promote entire interior space. fully paneled oak rooms like the one we are in today. we have worked to remove those save those and move those to museum fist they are not lan marks. i guess that is irrelevant van now the castro thor there is a big debate regards to the seats and use of this. how would you prospect that topic. the seats are not historic. i understand that the use case may have historic purpose in terms of people sitting for a sing languages and other things this have gone on for many years the seats themselves i support the decision this those are not historic. >> thank you. seeing no other comments among my colleague open up to public comment. mr. clerk. wh

and i want to thank president peskin for his early cosponsorship.een involved in this legislation as limp thank you very much. >> thank you. miss herrera will you read the amendment. or audrey. when am do that? audrey? great. >> okay. >> and now audrey from planning department. >> thank you. >> good afternoon, supervisors historic preservation and planning commission heard this item in january and almosted 've recommended prove with modifications. as miss herrera stated most incorporated today. one additional recommendation the planning commission recommendd that was not included in the draft but this supervisor ronen's office is supportive of and hope you make today is to require the department will planning upon department record notices of violation where a penalty will be assessed against title of the property. the commission is recommend thanksgiving they want to ensure this potential new property owner before they purchase the property and the title is transferred is aware of outstanding monetary penalties or any outstanding violations on the

. >> thank you, president peskin. there are a couple of things i want to address. from time to time, it comes up about how many police officers we should have in the city and county of san francisco. there is a lot of ways to measure that. but importantly there was a long process about how we underwent that under the supervisor and former president norman ye that was based on workload and population, visitor statistics, calls for service data, in the many years that i have been in and around san francisco politics and san francisco city government, which began with my first job out of college working for the district attorney. i think that was excellent and important work that did it right to figure out how many police our unique characters ikz needs. it always, irritates me a little bit when i hear people use residential population as it a de nominater that is used here in san francisco. in 2019, we also had 26 and a half million visitors just tourist coming to san francisco. that's equivalent of the population of texas coming to visit. and that's not counting the

i want to recognize supervisor peskin. move item one with positive recommendation to full board and i'm sorry that supervisor safai is stoy his way but let's call the roll on that motion to forward with positive recommendation vice chair mandelman. >> aye. >> member safai, absent. >> chair chan. >> aye. >> we have 2 ayes with member safai absent am >> motion passes. call item 2 >> item 2 is an ordinance amending the business and tax regulation's code to expand through fiscal 27-28 temporary suspension of the business registration and fee requirements to transportation met york drivers and taxi drivers. member who is wish to comment call 415-655-0001, access code: 2491 751 5889 ##. once connected press star 3 to enter the speaker line a prompt will indicate you raised your hand. when you have been unmuted that is your signal to begin comments. board president pes pel would you like to make comments before we call for presentation. >> thank you for your cosponsorship. i don't have much to tood what is set forth other than to