it doesn't seem to have pete lindsay hoiles _ doesn't seem to have pete lindsay hoiles interest.— doesn'tarry _ hoiles interest. management, what do you make of it? harry makes - hoiles interest. management, what do you make of it? harry makes an - you make of it? harry makes an excellent point about what lindsay hoyle has chosen to comment on and not comment on. the article about angela rayner was ugly, misogynistic drivel. i think there is a valid question to ask even this is based on an anonymous tory mp of why they felt it was necessary to publish, why they frame the article to seem to further their misogyny and insult angela rayner as though she's thick because she didn't go to oxford union debating in her younger years. i think those are all valid questions. what's not really valid is to get the speaker to try and tell them off for reported comments, should they be true in the first place it is a slippery slope. they are much more serious problems that lindsay hoyle could deal with. i do have simply because he sort of operates like a head of hr in the comments. and he probably feels