for neither randolph nor peter carr, can be made a symbol for america. indignant revisionism however is not a substitute for concrete facts and relevant evidence. blatant speculation is not drawn with a sharp pencil, but a broad brush. thomas jefferson, both a man, and his family amount to something more important than soren gossett, now obscuring his memory. the hemmings case against mr. jefferson rests on three skeletal pieces of evidence. and i want to talk about them today. framed by selective exclusion of all the scope of tory evidence, pointing to mr. jefferson's complete innocence. number one, the hearsay testimony of sally's son, madison, who gave an interview to a politically biased editor 50 years after the fact, stating that he, madison, was the son of thomas jefferson. number two, the unreliable documentation, stating the physical precedence of jefferson at the time that each of sally's conceptions. and three, the misleading dna, which would be excluded in a real trial and discredited in whole or part. so let's talk about the most credible ev