as peter clarke terms it, you may encounter unexpected "potholes." peter clarke: well, the first pothole is being able to communicate effectively with a physician. we were in the examining room with an older woman who was coming to her physician for a routine post-adjuvant chemotherapy session. and she came in in a bright green jumpsuit, and she was vivacious and energetic, and her physician asked what she'd been doing. she said well, you know, i've just come from my jazzercise class. and he exploded in indignation that she, in her physical condition would do jazzercise. well, she fled the examination in tears and, as we learned, never again visited the physician. and, a number of months later, finally succumbed to her condition. that's such a pointless and needless... expression of deference to a physician, rather than standing your ground and saying, "this is why i'm doing this. this is keeping me alive emotionally. this is providing the energy that i need to continue my life." barbara korsch: everett koop has made statements that 90% of the errors

that thejust know president is grateful to the ,roup, richard clarke katzenstein, peter swire for devoting themselves to the suffered over the last several for them to consider. over the next several weeks, we will be reviewing the report and they6 recommendations as consider the path forward including sorting through which we will implement which might require further study and which we will choose not to pursue. it's a substantive, lengthy report and it merits serious review and assessment. when we finish the internal review, the overall internal review in january, the president will deliver remarks to outline .he outcomes of our work anticipating this question, i will go right to the answer. we had intended to release the full report in january given the inaccurate and incomplete reports about the content, we felt it was important to allow people to see the full report to draw the wrong conclusions and for that reason we will be doing that this afternoon, releasing the full report. speak onhe president that at all today act go >> i would not expect that. i don't have any scheduling of t

note that thet president is grateful to the group, richard clarke, jeffrey stone, peter, and others,for devoting themselves to this effort over the past several months and providing thoughtful input for the administration to consider as we conclude the ongoing inter-agency review of signals and intelligence collection being led by the white house. now, over the next several weeks, we will be reviewing the review group report, and it's 46 recommendations, as we consider the path forward, including sorting through which recommendations we will implement, which might require further study, and which we will choose not to pursue. it is a substantive, link the report, and it merits serious review and assessment. when we finish the internal review, the overall internal review in january, the president will deliver remarks to outline the outcomes of our work. question, i this will go right to the answer. while we had intended to release the review group's a full report in january, as i said earlier, given an accurate reports, we thought it was important for people to see the full report to

ritual -- richard clarke cass sunstein and peter swire for devoting himself to the separate and providing input file full and put for the administration to consider as we include the review of signals intelligence collection being led by the white house. now over the next several weeks, we will be reviewing the review group's report and its 46 recommendations as we consider the path forward including sorting through which recommendations we will implement, which might require further study in which we will choose not to pursue. it's a substantive lengthy report and it merits serious review and assessment. when we finish the internal review the overall internal review in january the president will deliver remarks to outlying the outcomes of our work. anticipating this question i will go right to the answer. while we had intended to release the review group's full report in january as i said earlier given the inaccurate and incomplete reports by the press about the report's content we felt it would be -- to draw their own conclusions and we will be doing that this afternoon releasing the fu

for now, i just note that the president is grateful to the group, richard clark, michael morrell, jeffrey stone, c.a.t, and peterfor devoting themselves to the effort over the past several months and providing input for the administration to consider as we conclude the ongoing interagency review of signal intelligence collection being lead by the white house. now over the next several weeks, we will be reviewing the review group's report. and the 46 recommendations as we consider the path forward, including sorting through which rights we will implement, which might require further study. and which we will choose not pursue. it's a substantiative, less than think report. it merits serious review and assessment. when we finish the internal review, the overall internal review in january, the president will deliver remarks to outline the outcomes of our work. anticipating this question, i'll go right to the answer. while we had intended to e release the review group's full report in january, as i said earlier, give inaccurate and incomplete report in the press about the report's cob tent. we felt it was important f

richard clarke, michael more rel, cass sunstein and peter squire several months for providing input for the administration to consider as we review signals intelligence collection being lead by the white house. it draws on the group members considerable expertise in intelligence, counterterrorism, civil liberties and law and privacy matters and on their consultations with the u.s. government privacy and civil liberties advocates in the private sector. as i mentioned yesterday over the next several weeks we'll review the review group's report and its more than 40 recommendations as we consider the path forward including sorting through which recommendations we will implement, which might require further study and which we will choose not to pursue. we would expect the overall internal review to be completed in january and the president will deliver remarks. as i mentioned yesterday the review group's report we expect to be released publicly. >> i'm sorry, released what? >> publicly. >> next month? >> i don't have timing on that but we do expect it to be released publicly. >> will the rev

clarke, former u.s. sever security adviser, michael morel, former deputy cia director, jeffrey stone, a university of chicago law professor, cass sunstein, a harvard law professor who once worked in the administration, and peterwire, who served on obama's national economic council. record and quite public in my concern over the actual independent of this group. i am one of the 47 technologist that wrote a letter to the president saying we need technological acumen on a technological review committee. unfortunately, that was ignored. i'm concerned that administrative division -- the administration officials comprise the entirety of this group. i do not see how you can do a truly independent review of surveillance when so many people are tied in. i think this is epitomized by the fact that this review group is housed under james clapper, under the very agency that it is supposed to be independently revealing. what you mean it is housed there? >> if you go to their website, you actually go to dni, you go to the intelligence ministry here in the united states. that is were you can get information about the group. he reports to james clapper and his agency. and that agency passes along what ever is embedded out of