have this extra mechanism which you might have heard of called the higgs mechanism named after peter higgs, he rode down the theory with massive particle's bleak as the we would make nonsensical prediction that high energy. it wouldn't make sense. the theory can't possibly just a simple theory with these fundamental methods. there has to be something more interesting going on and that is called the higgs mechanism. i'm not going to explain it in detail but i have a chapter in the book explaining what it means. in addition to that there is another puzzle, why are the masses what they are? with the scale for those masses? it is a real puzzle if you just use quantum field theory which is what we use that combines together special relativity and quantum mechanics. what we do and we believe it is right but if you were to calculate how heavy you think the match should be you would find there's a discrepancy of 15 orders of magnitude. it makes the theory work. looks like you have to do an enormous fraud or what we call fine-tuning. .. it seems as likely it's likely to be something rather interest

extra mechanism which you might've heard of called the higgs mechanism made after the physicist peter higgs, if you just wrote down the tier of massive particles would make nonsensical predictions at higher energies. it just wouldn't make sense. the theory can't be that possible. there has to be something more interesting going on in the more interesting thing is called the higgs mechanism which not explain in detail but i have a whole chapter where he really explain what it means in terms of particles of acquiring mass. in addition to that, there's another puzzle, which is particles get their mass, but why are the masses but they are? what sets the scale for the masses? in fact, it is a real puzzle if you just use quantum field eerie, which is what we use that combines together quantum mechanics to be particles of physics. it's what we do and we believe it's ray. if you calculate how have you think these should be, you would find there is a discrepancy of 16 orders of magnitude. so to make the theory work, looks like you have to do an enormous statue what we call fine-tuning. now, i'm glad

you didn't have this extra mechanism which might've heard of called the hitt isism named after peter higgs, futures were down the theory he would make nonsensical projections of high-energy. just wouldn't make sense. the theory can't be a simple theory with the fundamental methods. there has to be something more just and going on in that march's thinking is called the higgs mechanism which i'm not going to explain in detail but i have a whole chapter the book where i explain what it means in terms of articles. in addition to that, there is another puzzle which is okay particles get their mass but why are the masses what they are? what sets the scale for those masses? in fact it's a real puzzle if you just use quantum field theory which is what we use that combines together special relativity and quantum mechanics to do particle physics. it's what what we do and we believe is right but if you were to calculate how heavy you think these masses should be you would find that there is a discrepancy of 16 orders of magnitude. it makes the theory work and it looks like you have to do an enormous