critics, including david davis and peter hitchens . and peter hitchens. >> so they're spying on a onabsolutely. david davis was at the time and david davis, who, the way, was questioned who, by the way, was questioned who, by the way, was questioned who questioned the who himself questioned the modelling behind the alarming covid death toll predictions on social media and elsewhere was investigated . for that, peter investigated. for that, peter hitchens was outspoken about monitoring . he was monitored monitoring. he was monitored after sharing an article based on leaked nhs papers which claimed data used to publicly justify the lockdown was incomplete . right now, what incomplete. right now, what happened? what happened here is and is becoming more and more apparent every day, whether you went along with it or not, whether you were happy to go along with it or not. people were controlling the information. could be information. so you could be controlled and that in itself goes against anything in a democratic society and a couple of years ago, if you'd said that, that would be a cr

critics, including david davis and peter hitchens . and peter hitchens. >> so they're spying on a onbsolutely. david davis was at the time and david davis, who, the way, was questioned who, by the way, was questioned who, by the way, was questioned who questioned the who himself questioned the modelling behind the alarming covid death toll predictions on social media and elsewhere was investigated . for that, peter investigated. for that, peter hitchens was outspoken about monitoring . he was monitored monitoring. he was monitored after sharing an article based on leaked nhs papers which claimed data used to publicly justify the lockdown was incomplete . right now, what incomplete. right now, what happened? what happened here is and is becoming more and more apparent every day, whether you went along with it or not, whether you were happy to go along with it or not. people were controlling the information. could be information. so you could be controlled and that in itself goes against anything in a democratic society and a couple of years ago, if you'd said that, that would be a cra

. >> peter hitchens said >> i mean, peter hitchens said he's trying to not drop the he's just tryinge ming vase. that's his whole job before the election. but he is giving good go. let's have giving it a good go. let's have a look. >> i just can i just agree with you and change my mind? i was. >> was braun. thank you, >> braun was braun. thank you, louis. first time louis has agreed have a quick louis. first time louis has agre> big star story for you for. for an ice rink. an ice rink monday. what does that mean? an ice monday. ice ice rink monday. ice rink monday. it means, like, tomorrow is be cold skate is going to be cold skate britain biggest bomb two britain biggest snow bomb in two years. i mean, that's looking back really far is back historically really far is tw

. >> peter hitchens said >> i mean, peter hitchens said he's trying to not drop the he's just tryinge ming vase. that's his whole job before the election. but he is giving good go. let's have giving it a good go. let's have a look. >> i just can i just agree with you and change my mind? i was. >> was braun. thank you, >> braun was braun. thank you, louis. first time louis has agreed have a quick louis. first time louis has agre> big star story for you for. for an ice rink. an ice rink monday. what does that mean? an ice monday. ice ice rink monday. ice rink monday. it means, like, tomorrow is be cold skate is going to be cold skate britain biggest bomb two britain biggest snow bomb in two years. i mean, that's looking back really far is back historically really far is tw

peter hitchens working.would we've never would argue that we've never actually seriously prosecuted a war not war on drugs, that we're not arresting it. arresting people for it. >> effectively, it's decriminalised facto decriminalised in a de facto way, they way, even when they decriminalise drugs, the gangsters control of gangsters still have control of the drugs take a look the drugs industry. take a look at and astrazeneca . at pfizer and astrazeneca. >> oh, here go. >> oh, here we go. >> oh, here we go. >> there . they're all gangsters. >> there. they're all gangsters. yeah wondered how long we'd get for lewis to go on to that. but never let's move never mind. let's move on to this now. this is a this story now. uh, this is a story in the i on boxing day and even though it's winter, the tories are feeling the heat. paul tories are feeling the heat. paul, have you got this one? >> yeah, they certainly are. tories facing growing elections . tories facing growing elections. threat from farage's reform uk .

chamberlain's policy in 1939, though, and hoover was one of the first to actually make this argument peter hitchens, among others, has also recently made it be tailor made a similar case more than a half century ago was that by extending this guarantee to poland, he effectively ripped up any chance of an agreement between poland and germany. it's a little bit delicate to talk about, particularly because poles are so proud of their history, of defiance and of fighting and they don't like to be remind it did that until roughly january to march of 39. they were effectively allied to nazi germany or at the very least negotiating on a very friendly basis with nazi germany. but in fact, chamberlain's guarantee is a little bit like throwing a, you know, a great big wrench in the works. it not just accelerate hitler's own plans with his own designs on poland. it also and this is the delicate part, convinced the poles that they had a security guarantee from britain, which they didn't really have. if you read the fine print, i actually did a column in this last year when i was talking about what i consider t

. >> peter hitchens said years issue. >> alleter hitchens said years issue. >> all these itchens saidrs issue. >> all these issues ared years issue. >> all these issues are justars ago, all these issues are just used conservatives used to attack conservatives and make them sound sort of like fusty sex fusty idiots. the same sex marriage just marriage thing, and they just lose argument, so marriage thing, and they just loseargumentnent, so marriage thing, and they just loseargument is nt, so marriage thing, and they just loseargument is already so marriage thing, and they just loseargument is already lost.) marriage thing, and they just lose church nt is already lost.) marriage thing, and they just lose church ofis already lost.) marriage thing, and they just lose church of england'slost.) the church of england's going to do do. do what it's going to do. >> but also argument would >> but also the argument would also the church also be by making the church more they're bringing also be by making the church more into they're bringing also be by making the church more into somewhatyringin

i'm just reading peter hitchens the abolition of britain at the moment.and the most gb news book ever. and he about this , about the he talks about this, about the changing and how changing in policies and how things things shifted . and i things how things shifted. and i think time i went think by the time i went to school could some of school, we could feel some of that. know, a different that. you know, it's a different world place world was a different place anyway there a anyway. it says there was a penod anyway. it says there was a period in the 1970s when suddenly there was this idea period in the 1970s when sudcifily there was this idea period in the 1970s when sudcif a' there was this idea period in the 1970s when sudcif a childe was this idea period in the 1970s when sudcif a child wantedis idea period in the 1970s when sudcif a child wanted to dea period in the 1970s when sudcif a child wanted to learn, that if a child wanted to learn, it would approach the table and they mustn't be forced to do it. well, of course, it didn't matter for the pri

. >> peter hitchens said years issue. >> alleter hitchens said years issue. >> all these itchens saidrs issue. >> all these issues ared years issue. >> all these issues are justars ago, all these issues are just used conservatives used to attack conservatives and make them sound sort of like fusty sex fusty idiots. the same sex marriage just marriage thing, and they just lose argument, so marriage thing, and they just loseargumentnent, so marriage thing, and they just loseargument is nt, so marriage thing, and they just loseargument is already so marriage thing, and they just loseargument is already lost.) marriage thing, and they just lose church nt is already lost.) marriage thing, and they just lose church ofis already lost.) marriage thing, and they just lose church of england'slost.) the church of england's going to do do. do what it's going to do. >> but also argument would >> but also the argument would also the church also be by making the church more they're bringing also be by making the church more into they're bringing also be by making the church more into somewhatyringin

i'm just reading peter hitchens the abolition of britain at the moment.and the most gb news book ever. and he about this , about the he talks about this, about the changing and how changing in policies and how things things shifted . and i things how things shifted. and i think time i went think by the time i went to school could some of school, we could feel some of that. know, a different that. you know, it's a different world place world was a different place anyway there a anyway. it says there was a penod anyway. it says there was a period in the 1970s when suddenly there was this idea period in the 1970s when sudcifily there was this idea period in the 1970s when sudcif a' there was this idea period in the 1970s when sudcif a childe was this idea period in the 1970s when sudcif a child wantedis idea period in the 1970s when sudcif a child wanted to dea period in the 1970s when sudcif a child wanted to learn, that if a child wanted to learn, it would approach the table and they mustn't be forced to do it. well, of course, it didn't matter for the pri

on top of that, i would add, hitchens , who i would add, peter hitchens, who i'm an admirer of, would terrorism. it's just a person with mental health issues. we shouldn't be pathologizing these things in such a way. what i would say, though, is you're on a watch list. you've been in prison for four years. i mean , you are four years. i mean, you are a terrorist. i think that's a reasonable thing. generally reasonable thing. i generally think place to think that's a decent place to come from. but in this instance, i would push back against i would push back against that. and look what an awful way and also look what an awful way to go these people were to go because these people were attacked with knives, with hammers. imagine hammers. i mean, i can't imagine a death than being a worse death than being bludgeoned hammer. this was bludgeoned by a hammer. this was a husband and wife , as olivia a husband and wife, as olivia said, nationals in paris said, german nationals in paris for the festive season . an for the festive season. an awful, awful story. and if he has got mental health i

i'm just reading peter hitchens the abolition of britain at the moment. about the changing and how changing in policies and how things things shifted . and i things how things shifted. and i think time i went think by the time i went to school could some of school, we could feel some of that. know, a different that. you know, it's a different world place world was a different place anyway there a anyway. it says there was a penod anyway. it says there was a period in the 1970s when suddenly there was this idea period in the 1970s when sudcifily there was this idea period in the 1970s when sudcif a' there was this idea period in the 1970s when sudcif a childe was this idea period in the 1970s when sudcif a child wantedis idea period in the 1970s when sudcif a child wanted to dea period in the 1970s when sudcif a child wanted to learn, that if a child wanted to learn, it would approach the table and they mustn't be forced to do it. well, of course, it didn't matter for the privileged children. always got children. they always got through home and through th