a veteran labour mp backed peter kyle's plan for a confirmatory referendum.ikely to need a longer extension anyway for a whole variety of other reasons so why not take advantage of that reality to hold a confirmatory vote on the likely outcome of brexit, whatever happens on the deliberation. as did a conservative without it would be a way to get theresa may deal through. it could be argues, why are going back to the people but i am going back clearly and only and with a great degree of self—loathing to say this, i'm going back purely because parliament is unable to reach a majority and reach a decision. the motion calls for nothing in this house should be approved without a referenda but we have to agree with this house the side. and please engage in that process come together, support a deal that protectsjobs in the economy and then put it to the british people. we believe it is essential to hold the people's vote on the final deal, ultimately, it must be a question of deciding between the things we know and which have worked well, though not perfectly for s

i've just been with peter kyle who picked for the amendment i voted for, which is whatever deal thatut it to the british people. and theresa may could do that. she could do it tomorrow. you could say, i've got my withdrawal agreement, negotiated it with the european union, she thinks it's rather good, put it to the british people and this whole thing would be done by september or october. and finally, given that stephen barclay stood up tonight, saying, pilate has failed yet again to reach a conclusion, he talked about it, seem to be hinting at the possibility of bringing the deal back. do you really think your hopes of another referendum can really be revived at this stage of the game? what do you think will happen on wednesday? we still got the highs vote of any of the options before parliament. you're not giving up? goodness, no! the british people are entitled to change their mind, just like mps change their mind, the way that they are voting. they did on her withdrawal agreement, they did tonight again. they are allowed to change their minds and vote again, but the british peopl

in respect to mr peter kyle's motion e, the ayes were 280, the noes were 282, so the noes have it.n respect tojoanna cherry‘s motion g, the ayes were 191, the noes were 292, so the noes habit. let's cross to our political correspondent, jessica parker. it looks like we are no further forward. that was the message from stephen barclay, who said that they had failed to reach a consensus. but now, ian blackford, on the motion the snp brought forward, which talked about a number of things, including potentially revoking article 50 in order to avoid an ideal brexit, you fell short by 151 votes, so you did worse than all. yes, but 121 labour mps abstained. if they had voted with us tonight we would have one, because we need to recognise that next week there is a real danger that the uk falls out of the eu with no deal. that would be catastrophic for everyone, so i really do question what on earth where the labour party doing? we could have stopped no deal as a serious prospect, and the labour party didn't step up to the plate. some recriminations are beginning, of course this whole proce

in respect of mr peter kyle's motion e, confirmatory public vote, the ayes were 280, the noes were 292noes have it. in respect ofjoanna cherry‘s motion g, parliamentary supremacy, the ayes were 191, the noes were 292, so the noes have it. the results is read out by the speaker. i'm just reading it with you from conservative mp nick boles, who says, i'm resigning the conservative whip with immediate effect this evening. —— a tweet here. the conservative party has shown itself to be incapable of compromise so i will sit as an independent, progressive conservative. so he's notjoining the independent group, may not be surprising because they did not vote for his common market 2.0 option this evening. here he was speaking earlier. i've given everything to an attempt to find a compromise that can take this country out of the eu while maintaining our economic strength and our political cohesion. i accept i have failed. i have failed chiefly because my party refuses to compromise. i regret therefore to announce that i can no longer sit for this party. 0h, nick! nick, don't go! come on. 0ne one

in respect to mr peter kyle's motion e, confirmatory public vote, the ayes were 280, the noes were 292y‘s motion g, parliamentary supremacy, the ayes were 191, the noes were 292, so the noes habit. —— in respect of mr clark's motion c, customs union, the ayes were 273, the noes were 276, so the noes have it. earlier i spoke to sebastian payne, the whitehall correspondent for the financial times. he's been following the events at westminster very closely. we have had the second series of the so—called indicative votes and mps we re so—called indicative votes and mps were meant to say here is an alternative to the plan i like. maybe we might like a customs union 01’ maybe we might like a customs union or staying in a single market or another referendum or forgetting the whole thing. mps have said no to all of those so we are exactly back to square of those so we are exactly back to square one. of those so we are exactly back to square one. it is now a week and a half until we are set to leave the eu and unless something changes between now and a week friday, we are about to crush out of

and the second is this pressure for a vote which was developed by peter kyle and phil wilson, two labourch mps, they then did quite a lot of work across the two parties to get support from both labour and tory mps, they have people like hugh merryman, villa hammond's pbs, they have got their amendments whipped by labour, which after being developed with input from keir starmer, sans iver high level, the labour party has been involved in this. —— philip hammond. the big question what this is, will actually a, be considered by theresa may, who, she has been a truly strong on throughout this process is to say there is no way i would never consider a second referendum. it is something that and debates, she has been strongest unusually. and this is one of the things they discussed today, hot a source say that said it came out multiple times in this meeting. —— a source told me that. no suggestion yet the government will move to that. i think crucially with this, there is a school of thought this is a separate issue in a sense. one thing is, what type i brexit that would go for. a separate thi

peter castro al-jazeera. for more on this let's speak to kyle bailey who is an aviation analyst a former f.a.a. safety team representative and a pilot he joins us now on skype from buffalo new jersey called the new york times investigation into boeing's manufacturing describes a culture that often valued production speed over quality how worried should we all be. you know we should first of all good morning and we should not be worried about this keep in mind boeing has about one hundred fifty three thousand employees and we're talking about a dozen employees actually that were making claims about this production facility so you know there really isn't much to worry about and voting has a stellar track record as in their production line and there really have been no no accidents or incidents as a result of such things as metal shavings and manufacturing anomalies that have happened have this is a factory that specific a manufacturer that dreamliner tests a little more about that plane and doesn't have any known issue. you know that the biggest no one issue that several years back the batteries

kyle mcadams, mary kennedy and ted mooney. ♪ for auburn we have -- [ audience aws ] donna braylon, peter winston, kevin parker and lisa armstrong jackson, bobby garcia and roger blaine. ♪ and for michigan state we -- [ cheers ] have dick cooper, victor de la rosa, kelly griffin and gary frick, jr. now -- ♪ [ cheers and applause ] guys, before i release you. before i release you, listen to me, okay? it's going to be really fun. now look -- [ laughter ] before i release you, it's going to be fun. not yet, not yet, not yet. i want no funny business. no -- hey, hey, hey, watch it buddy. [ laughter ] i want no funny -- hey, stop it, please. no butt sniffing, no peeing, all right? let's make it a fair game. whoever gets to the bowl of kibble first will win the final four. okay? [ laughter ] i think i'm going to go with virginia, right? we'll see. here we go. release the puppies! ♪ [ audience aws ] [ cheers and applause ] [ bell rings ] >> jimmy: it's a photo finish! it's a photo -- guys, hold on. it's a photo finish. can we show it in slo-mo? the winner is -- [ audience yelling ] virginia! ♪ [ cheers and applause ] [ bell rings ] the

kyle, are you here, or sheela, or allen? please come on down. if not, i'm going to keep going. i'll get back to you. peter, tia, and curtis. peter, tia, and curtis. >> good evening, commissioners. my name is curtis bradford, and i'm district six resident. been here over 20 years. as a resident of this district, i believe i have just as much say how we used resources of this community as any other resident. i am fully in support of the navigation center for lot 330. you know, it strikes me -- i've heard the conversation about wanting to protect our children and our seniors. i'm willing to go with that argument. you might be surprised to find out i support that statement. but using that logic, this is exactly the right place to build it because it is a fairly low density neighborhood when it comes to children and seniored compared to other neighborhoods in the city. >> excuse me. let him talk. >> the tenderloin, which is the highest density children in the city, highest density of seniors in the city is also the highest density of homeless in the city. so if we're really concerned with what's best for children, seniors, and

you are pushing for. audience in the uk and around the world what you are pushing fonm is me and peter kyleon saying that whatever agreement it agreed to between the british government and the eu should go out to the british people for final ratification. that means that when the limitation bill goes through parliament and becomes an act of parliament and it is all put to the british people for them to say, we want to go ahead with this or not. we believe the british people have the right to compare what brexit is now with what the brexit facts are compared to what the promise we were made to and half years ago and if it compares favourably or not. so what would happen if this got the right numbers, you would then be willing to back the prime minister's deal but then there would be a referendum at which point you would want to vote remain? we would facilitate the passage of the day through parliament. then it would go to the british people. if the british people agreed with it, we would implement it, just like the good friday agreement or the av referendum from 2011whether legislation was i

the outcome of the referendum would be but i do know, particularly the proposal put forward by peter kyleck in parliament but also come to a conclusion that is decided by millions of people, notjust mps. therefore restoring democratic legitimacy to the process. people are saying any mps who are seeing they are in favour of brexit, but voting against the withdrawal agreement are trying to sabotage brexit. what we are seeing effectively is an argument against mac between those who are into different camps and there isn't a real coming together, there isn't a real coming together, there isn't a real mood for compromised and the camps remain as they always were, no deal versus remain. overturn article 50. very peculiarly, the thing that is pointed at mps that is pointed at remain mps, the leave mps who meet all of those promises that have been broken have been the most intransigent in this process and keep on defeating the prime minister. i think what we have seen on friday and yesterday in the house of commons, is a shift towards consensus. sure, nothing has emerged with a majority yet. we h

well, one of those options comes from labour mps phil wilson and peter kyle.ething very similar and you did not get a majority. that is right. we put exactly the same motion down this week. we got the most votes of any of the propositions. we just fell short by 27. we need another 15 mps to come on board. what we are basically looking for is consensus in all of this and then putting it out of the people. it seems to us that the prime minister of vsd let the moment defines brexit, there is a logjam in parliament. the best way to move forward is by putting the proposition or any proposition so that they can look at what brexit has become and compare that with the promises that were made to and a half years ago, see if they agree with it and if they do, fine, there will be no need for any further referendums, the legislation will be in place. it is a way of bringing consensus, bringing this to an end and then moving on and trying to heal the country. just to understand the process by which that would happen in your view, if that was agreed, you would then vote fo