peter labelle, fuel politicians communicate like donald trump. his words can be easily interpreted in a number of different ways. for example, take ukraine, does the president have a real piece plan? well, he defy washington's traditional conventional wisdom. also, how terrified your a? b of trump discuss these issues and more, i'm joined by my guess towards samuel in budapest. he's a broadcast or the goggle, which can be found on youtube and locals and assemble. we have 3, several non. he is a story and, and political commentator. alright gentlemen cross that goals and effect and use.

the cross block were all things are considered on peter labelle to mind. you were discussing nato n ukraine. the . well, let's go back to scott in washington. you know, for all the talk of, of negotiations. i'm getting a team together and the point person on all that, scott, at the end of the day this is going to be dealt with on the battlefield is that's the only because of the, the type of people that are being um, involved in this here. i mean, what that mean, kelly's what to mean. he and he's been doing this for like 70 years or something. i mean people don't change. okay. and that's why it's good to be settled on the battlefield. scott, you know, i, i believe that again, i don't pretend to have any insight into russian government thinking i don't speak on behalf of the russian government. that's the little aside for the f b i who's watching this that's just my assessment. after years of studying the russian government, this russian government, they haven't done what they've done here. they didn't initiate what they called military technical means back

over in time peter labelle, fuels politicians communicate like donald trump. these words can be easily interpreted in a number of different ways. for example, take ukraine, does the president have a real piece plan? will he defy washington's traditional conventional wisdom? also, how terrified should your be of trump discuss these issues and more, i'm joined by my guess towards samuel in budapest. he's a broadcast where the guy go, which can be found on youtube and locals and assemble. we have the leaks that will not. he is a story and, and political commentator, right? gentlemen, across that goals and the fact that news can jump anytime you want. and i always appreciate it. all right, let's start out with george in budapest, again, ukraine is forcibly meetings, but on the agenda, no surprised them. trump said he was going to end and end of day. well, they didn't happen and it's not happening. i have to wait in mid to both of you. um, initially i was not the latest, but i was, you know, it gave me some kind of confidence that, you know, tom says this war has t

all things are considered non peter labelle. to remind you we're discussing maga, the, okay, let's go back to n g and in miami, over the last few hours we had a earth shaking news. oh, good news. um a cease fire coming into effect uh, surrounding and conflict between these railways and hum us. and i don't want to go into the origin story here because a lot has been talked about that i have very strong views on it. but we are talking about maga and it is really quite remarkable that donald trump, before the interest office, had to stump his foot once and hard. and he got his way and something that we were told for what 1618 months was impossible to solve. and that was an issue that, that is divided. the american people divided the democratic party divided the republican party and even divisions in within the mag, a movement here. but they are on the, on the hours before the analogy ration, donald trump, can claim at least temporarily a federally the, as a foreign policy. one of the stuff, even president of the united states. angi

a former british ambassador to washington, peter jay, labeled the speech as extremely hard line and said he seemed to be declaring nonmilitary on the same on the soviet union. he said if he if he does mean it, it's very frightening. one of the most brutal reaction lines came from nancy banks in the guardian newspaper, who labeled the speech as unmoored and then set about it that it was like lincoln at gettysburg. in only one way, it propelled lincoln's calm at the world. well, little note nor long remember what we here. a prediction that turned out to be quite wrong. she even criticized reagan's, calling him an average of performer and. editorial in the guardian hit. listen to the incredibly negative language and the the the arrogance of the language. they talked about reagan's homespun. amy ability and said the president, a senior citizen who when crisis breaks, is left to slip up. the editorial concluded that very little can be built on the president world words which reflects his benign blank helplessness. it is revealing that some of the most positive comment in the british press abo

the first book was the year i was peter the great is a title and that was because khrushchev labeled me peter the great at that help me a great deal as a journalist in getting closer to him. the second book was assignment russia, and that was when edward r. murrow hired cbs and a couple of years later as he sort of moved to the system i've never been a journalist before, and he wanted somebody representing cbs in moscow who spoke the language and knew about the history, the literature of the country and i had written something for the times that he liked and on that basis had a conversation which lasted for three hours in which he asked me any number of questions, really untested journalist. he stood up, , put his arm aroud me and said how would you like to join cbs? i said yes. that was sort of the end of my career as a scholar and the beginning of it as a journalist to may of 1960. and this book begins with kennedy's inauguration, and a very revealing speech that khrushchev made giving it a sense the world, his judgment, of of what the world should be like an kennedy of course indep

memoir about your time as a journalist in russia but -- guest: the first was because khrushchev labeled me peterat and that helped me a great deal as a journalist getting closer to him. the second book was assignment russia and that was when edward r. murrow hired me at cbs and a couple years later as he sort of moved me through the system, i had never been a journalist before and they wanted somebody representing cbs in moscow who spoke the language and knew about the history and the literature of the country and i had written something for the times he had liked and on that basis and the conversation we had which lasted for three hours which he asked me any number of questions, a really fantastic journalist. he stood up and put his arm around me and said how would you like to join cbs. i said yes. that was sort of the end of my career as a scholar and the beginning of it as a journalist in that second book carries me to may of 1960 and this book begins with kennedy's inauguration and a very revealing speech that khrushchev made giving it a sense of the world, his judgment of what the world sho

memoir about your time as a journalist in russia but -- guest: the first was because khrushchev labeled me peterat and that helped me a great deal as a journalist getting closer to him. the second book was assignment russia and that was when edward r. murrow hired me at cbs and a couple years later as he sort of moved me through the system, i had never been a journalist before and they wanted somebody representing cbs in moscow who spoke the language and knew about the history and the literature of the country and i had written something for the times he had liked and on that basis and the conversation we had which lasted for three hours which he asked me any number of questions, a really fantastic journalist. he stood up and put his arm around me and said how would you like to join cbs. i said yes. that was sort of the end of my career as a scholar and the beginning of it as a journalist in that second book carries me to may of 1960 and this book begins with kennedy's inauguration and a very revealing speech that khrushchev made giving it a sense of the world, his judgment of what the world sho

in 13 years, important strategically, one of first goals, caucus that gary peters and i created to repeal jackson vanish label on the region. -- i realize you have a lot of priorities on your plate. when you are confirmed, i would say rescinding it would be a good faith indoing that central asia needs to grow, would you work with me and senator peters to have your team work with to us remove this. >> i believe, the permanent removal requires legislative act, i don't think that senator murphy has a bill on that as well, there is a relic of an era passed, some argue we should use it at leverage for human rights concessions or go stronger in our way. i think in some cases, it is absurd relic of the past, kazakhstan department of commerce said is market economy. they hoisted the -- hosted the wto minister a couple years ago, they have met conditions, wete will work wow this. >> i think it is a neglected part of world. maybein hosting's summit there. we need more friends in central asia and look forward to working wow that. when i hope my comments, i have conflicts in world, we forget most important relations in o

the caucus senator peters and i created was to repeal the jackson-vanik label on the region and extend normal trade relations with cause asked on and was pakistan -- with kazakhstan and uzbekistan. -- that central asia needs right now to grow. my question is would you work with me and senator peters to have your team work with us to remove this designation? sen. rubio: i believe the permanent removal will require legislative action. i think senator murphy has a bill on that as well. this is a relic of an era that has passed. some argue we should use it as leverage for human rights concessions or leverage to get them go stronger our way as opposed to russia but i think it is an absurd relic of the past. i think kazakhstan, the department of commerce has said they are a market economy. they hosted the wto minister just a couple years ago. we will work with you on this because i think that is important. >> it is a neglected part of the world and working on senator murphy with this, i want to work with president trump to think about maybe hosting some kind of a summit there. after withdraw

the caucus senator peters and i created was to repeal the jackson-vanik label on the region and extend normal trade relations with cause asked on and was pakistan -- with kazakhstan and uzbekistan. -- that central asia needs right now to grow. my question is would you work with me and senator peters to have your team work with us to remove this designation? sen. rubio: i believe the permanent removal will require legislative action. i think senator murphy has a bill on that as well. this is a relic of an era that has passed. some argue we should use it as leverage for human rights concessions or leverage to get them go stronger our way as opposed to russia but i think it is an absurd relic of the past. i think kazakhstan, the department of commerce has said they are a market economy. they hosted the wto minister just a couple years ago. we will work with you on this because i think that is important. >> it is a neglected part of the world and working on senator murphy with this, i want to work with president trump to think about maybe hosting some kind of a summit there. after withdraw