peter mandelson said keir starmer has _ ways. peter mandelson said keir starmer has made _ ways.labour safe to ways. peter mandelson said keir - starmer has made labour safe to vote for again, the question now is what for. you say you are confident of your programme, i put it to you that if you went out in your constituency in stockport when you grow up, if you ask what they thought labour stands for, they will know much of a clue,. l stands for, they will know much of a clue,. , , stands for, they will know much of a clue,. , ., clue,. i suppose the general election. — clue,. i suppose the general election. you _ clue,. i suppose the general election, you know, - clue,. i suppose the general. election, you know, keywords clue,. i suppose the general - election, you know, keywords and clue,. i suppose the general _ election, you know, keywords and how we fight that is something that will be put together when we do it but i suppose it comes from the bottom up and the work we do in between, so for example, my green paper, that is ready to speech as soon as we get into government an

are you agreeing with that famous quote from peter mandelson, are you saying you are intensely relaxedg filthy rich? as long as they pay their taxes. which peter of course said. yes, we do want people to be able to get on in life. to be filthy rich? yes, if they're going to be filthy, i wouldn't use that term, but people who are going to have great wealth, it is about showing that wealth and understanding when that wealth comes from. so you won't attack rishi sunakfor being rich? i won't attack and for being rich but i will attack him if he doesn't use the wealth in a way that is responsible, we talk about rich people paying a bit more and try to push the burden of what was a couple of weeks ago and a budget that absolutely decimated our economy and now there is a black hole, do not make working people who are already paying more through their mortgages and through the cost of living, pay for that mistake. it is about what he prioritises as a prime minister and shows that he understands what it is like for other people. i don't expect him not to be rich. so, it's clear, he's rich, but

be clear, i think you're saying this, but are you are you agreeing with that famous quote from peter mandelsonng you're intensely relaxed about people getting filthy rich? as long as they pay their taxes, which peter, of course, said, yes, we do want people to be able to get on in life and to be filthy rich. and yet, to use this phrase, they're going to be, you know, filthy rich, as he says. i wouldn't use that term, but people are going to have great wealth. it's about sharing that wealth and understanding where that wealth comes from. so you won't attack rishi sunak for being rich then? i won't attack him for being rich. what i will attack him for is if he doesn't use that wealth in a way that is responsible. and we talk about people with the broadest shoulders paying a little bit more. and he tries to push the burden of what was a couple of weeks ago a mini budget that absolutely decimated our economy and now there's a black hole. do not make working people who are already paying more through their mortgages and through the cost of living pay for that mistake. it's about what he prioritises

there was a peter mandelson _ this is it? there was a peter mandelson resignation - this is it?lson resignation and| this is it? there was a peter- mandelson resignation and then when _ mandelson resignation and then when gordon brown was about to calla _ when gordon brown was about to call a general election and frankly— call a general election and frankly had he called the general election at that point new labour might have survived another — new labour might have survived another five years, but he delayed, _ another five years, but he delayed, and i got the call to id delayed, and i got the call to go into— delayed, and i got the call to go into downing street and interview him in downing street and i_ interview him in downing street and i didn't know which way he was going _ and i didn't know which way he was going to go and when he said. — was going to go and when he said, andrew, i have decided not to— said, andrew, i have decided not to go— said, andrew, i have decided not to go into an election... that— not to go into an election... that was— not to go into an election

. - peter mandelson, 2001. i am a fighter and not a quitter!d absolutely no spending reductions. they all cheered. this week, the chancellor announced a new wave of cuts. she has learnt you can't short cut and go ahead of the experts, maybe going back to a bit of the brexit debate when the conservative party used to be the party conserving institutions, but they seem to reinvent themselves since brexit as one which doesn't trust experts. can the prime minister turn| to her chancellor right now, get permission to make another u—turn and commit to raising i the state pension ati the rate of inflation? i honestly don't know what the honourable gentleman is talking about. i would argue that is not a u—turn, that's clarifying an uncertain position. we have been clear in our manifesto that we will maintain the triple lock and i am committed to it, so is the chancellor. this comes across as a government which can't decide what it is doing. the express said on wednesday morning, don't do it, prime minister — which seemed like a red line, if they are sa

there was the peter mandelson resignation, the one that sticks in my head was gordon brown was abouteral election and, frankly, had he done so at that point, new labour might have survived another five years but he delayed. and i got the call to go into downing street and interview him in downing street and i didn't know which way he would go. an when he said, andrew, i've decided there's not going to be a general election, i thought, well... a very good impression! i have disliked the dissipate my jaw to get it right! the right thing for the country is not have a general election and i thought, well, and i remember doing the interview and go to the window and looking down and there pacing furiously around was adam boulton of the sky news team and i thought, yeah! it's funny because when i got the call to do the interview with the former prime minister, part of the dawning process, it was obvious she was in a lot of trouble, but the very taking of the call showed how much trouble she was in because the only reason i was being invited was because of the amount of trouble she was in. y

quit the government and came back later, david blunkett resigned after a scandal, he was back, peter mandelsonthere have been allegations... do you think she should stand aside? resigned? let me finish the point first. where there is also a report of the cabinet secretary and cabinet office having advised against disappointment. keir starmer has made clear rishi sunak should be replacing her. it was an error of judgment to appoint her this immensely seriousjob judgment to appoint her this immensely serious job and to do so for the sake of the political deal, just in order to get his way into number 10, just in order to get his way into numberio, it just in order to get his way into number 10, it shows a callousness towards national security issues. he would i am sure deny that is what it is about. i am sure we will hear more about this moving story. i want to ask you about what is happening at the immigration processing centre in kent. 2600 people are being held there, the maximum capacity is about 1000 less than that. clearly unsatisfactory situation. we can see pictures of the centre now. wi

say because the alternative would be to leave and it's a simple as that and she was channelling peter mandelson the support of their party but right now, she can't.- rely on the support of their party but right now, she can't. before we let ou but right now, she can't. before we let you go. — but right now, she can't. before we let you go. some — but right now, she can't. before we let you go. some up _ but right now, she can't. before we let you go, some up for— but right now, she can't. before we let you go, some up for us - but right now, she can't. before we let you go, some up for us what i but right now, she can't. before we let you go, some up for us what we know about suella braverman leaving the government, the very important post of home secretary? this afternoon _ post of home secretary? this afternoon the _ post of home secretary? this afternoon the home - post of home secretary? “i“i : afternoon the home secretary has resigned and her resignation has been accepted by the prime minister and they met this afternoon in parliament for a face—to—face meeting and i understand the reason

. - peter mandelson, 2001.nstitutions, but they seem to reinvent themselves since brexit as one which doesn't trust experts. can the prime minister turn| to her chancellor right now, get permission to make another u—turn and commit to raising i the state pension ati the rate of inflation? i honestly don't know what the honourable gentleman is talking about. i would argue that is not a u—turn, that's clarifying an uncertain position. we have been clear in our manifesto that we will maintain the triple lock and i am committed to it, so is the chancellor. this comes across as a government which can't decide what it is doing. the express said on wednesday morning, don't do it, prime minister — which seemed like a red line, if they are saying that it is serious and that triggered the response. do you think she minds what the express says? i think so. the telegraph? yes, this is the base. before you go, you have your phone, how many messages have you got from tory mps? how busy do you get on a day like this? it is go